chickers

i know what you mean but there was a glaring area which concerned everyone...coupled with the fact this project is the last one up so has to suffer the additional developments traffic management was always going to be a stickler

i think because of the interest this project has they didnt want anything in the report to be deemed to be right or wrong..they wanted facts something we didnt deliver

i dont know if you are letting your hatred of the council cloud your replies mate the club put together a access and scale application which was always going to be rejected, it will go back the is will be dotted and the ts will be crossed and a outline plan covering the whole scheme will be submitted, since the size of the project has been modified to make it more appeasable to the residents in the surrounding area, and the access issues have been cleared up, then there will be no reason to object the outline plan, following on this then a detailed plan will be issued, with colour choices and the like... the council only rejected it because the client hadnt provided sufficient information for it to pass, and the main concern was the volume of traffic which the report the client issued was incorrect if the traffic and the scale of the project had been correct then the outline plan for access and scale would be accepted ready to make a full outline planning permission submission

the application the club was making were for an outline planning permission limited to at this stage access and scale, with a detailed plan to follow the access and scale application the club made was incorrect and rejected...how can that be the councils fault is it your tutors fault if you turn up for a spanish exam and write in french??

the full application was not going to be rejected as it was scale and access only....since we overspecced the scale and the traffic report was wrong..we messed up on both parts of our application..be foolish to grant permission if they are factually incorrect...wouldnt you agree?

they have got the permission to build a new stand to replace the lookers...the new development (Phase two) would only be sourced once phase one is nearing completion, i havent seen the build programme, but i would fathom a guess at 9 months say, which gives them a lot of time to tighten up on the two areas that they had concerns with, and produce the documents in a format which is more understandable to those that are to make the choice!

The council havent let the club down, had the traffic report that the client had paid for been accurate then there would not have been too much cause for concern over the scale of the project, as simon agreed to liaise with the residents as the detailed planning submission was to be submitted

Just got back in now the main stand (ford/lookers stand) has been approved for development in its entirity The outline (scale and access only) planning permission has been rejected, this has happened before, its not the end of the world, i wouldnt if i was in charge of the purse strings be looking at selling up and buying myself a yacht! the reasons they had for objecting the outline scheme were The level of the resaleable / rerentable assets that the development has (some counciller worked out that there are 500 appartments retailing at 200k each generates 100million for someone) and that the independant report from the traffic management specialists contained an error in the numbers. i would fathom a guess that all that is required is a reduction / disproving of the resaleable value of the residential development and a further report in the traffic volumes for the development which shows more clearly the findings and its a winner....however....within the planning panel certain people seem to have a strange idea of what there role within this process is....one compared the development to that of a 1970s russia and one was pulling out figures that a developer akin to bellway or redrow would be very fortunate to make on a prime city centre site for values. One thing that concerns me with this development however is that there is a lot of regeneration / new build already been allocated permission within the area, which would need to be taken account when formulating traffic flows and the like...it seems that the gates have been nearly locked shut for development....just hope its not too late!!

You want to hear the abuse he gives JJ!! :P

Ill be in the pub for this one! Money well spent i think!

Gone for nil points then if we get any points its a bonus and one which can result in getting drunk!

i wont be there

can i bring the jazz flute??

the der der one??? im sure that has been done without the need for a bit of pig skin

i think its harder to get a ghetto blaster in thru the turnstiles mate for the robot dancing!!

few of the people near me recorded it, most of them were out on the pop last nite so i wouldnt expect it to be uploaded until later on today (if at all today the way they were drinking last nite!!)

what about quadraphenia (sp)

yeah im sure the mods (who I love sooooooo much) will formulate my reply though!

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

thats not for discussing on a family board, i dont want to give OWTB another reason to terminate my account!

could have been worse could have gone to tunisia with cha cha slide and people offering you dirty minge and coke!

might be the same guy who was offering lines to us this morning i didnt know he was a scriptwriter as well!

i didnt have a good time, well i did until i the unnamed person was ralfing his guts up in our room!! was a good doo, mike has texted me saying we will have to do it again!! £6 for a pint of stella!?!?!?!?

Cheers for your help!

its how we refer to them at work, problem with a pc we get a gimp in perhaps i should edit the title to geeks