Firmly in the Johnson IN camp at the moment, I thought I'd take a look at a comparison between the initial seasons of Paul Dickov and Lee Johnson...
In Paul Dickov's first season in charge, after 35 games we had won 11, drawn 13 and lost 11. This saw us sitting on 43 points after picking up 17 points in 18 games between New Year and Mid-March. Under Dickov, we had scored 46 goals (including a period of over 9 goal-less hours) and conceded 52 (including 11 in 2 games).
We were knocked out in the first round of the FA Cup, League Cup and Football League Trophy under Dickov to Accrington Stanley, Scunthorpe and Shrewsbury respectively.
We gained 11 points from losing positions as well as dropping 30 points after taking the lead. We scored 9 goals in the last 10 minutes of games (gaining 6 points from the goals) and conceded 14 (7 of which cost us points).
In Lee Johnson's first season, after 35 games we have won 10, drawn 8 and lost 17. This saw us sitting on 38 points after picking up 14 points in 13 games between New Year and Mid-March. Under Johnson, we've scored 40 goals and conceded 51.
We were knocked out of the FA Cup in the 3rd round, the League Cup in the 1st round and Football League Trophy in the Area Semi-Final to Liverpool, Derby County an Chesterfield respectively.
We've gained 12 points from losing positions as well as dropping 16 points after taking the lead. We've scored 5 goals in the last 10 minutes of games (gaining 6 points from the goals) and conceded 9 goals (4 of which have lost us games).
Below is a comparison of when, in games, goals were scored and conceded between the two seasons.
This shows that we seemed to begin and finish games equally well in terms of scoring, but switched off in the second half.
This shows that in terms of scoring, we end both halves well. But we tend to concede towards the end of games again.
What do you make of this? Do you think it means anything and has the data been useful?