Jump to content

dish

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    519
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dish

  1. TTA are getting increasingly frustrated about the lack of Council support to develop the stadium. With results not seeing us into the Championship, and the relatively decent years of investment, and the downturn in general TTA business, it's fair to say that TTA want out. What would be gutting to see would be (and I hope I'm wrong here), would be that, to cover the previous losses incurred by TTA in funding financial shortfalls at the club, the key worker home land is sold, the money is pocketed (along with any profits or share of the profits from the scheme) and TTA clear out. That would leave the club in a hole as, even when the club had an option to buy back the land (from the Council) at a relative pitance, even old heads like Peter Risdale said that they couldn't see the 'investment' stacking up. The land is the only attraction to new owners, and if TTA milk that and leave, that'd leave a relatively unattractive proposition for any future investor.
  2. dont think theres any truth in this....well, except that TTA are looking to sell (citing 'problems with the stadium' as the factor).
  3. look, I've told you what I know to be true and you're doing your best to try and either shoot me down or discredit what I'm saying. I'm not on here every day saying blah, blah, blah, fact. I happen to know what i've posted is true, you either believe it or you don't...I guess only time will prove me right.
  4. Right, cos you know who I am. I'm telling you, I know for a FACT that BP would never be redeveloped. Reading the latest comments only supports my view...carefully planned words by Corney.
  5. I agree, never got a proper crack in the team, but at that time, we had a midfield bang in form....Killer, Hughes (and was Rob Lee here??) He's 20, now and hopefully would have improved his game. Possible loan deal.....(oh no, not another loan signing!)
  6. Boundary Park won't ever be redeveloped for a stadium. Fact.
  7. take a picture on your mobile let everyone decide... we could have a poll!!!
  8. BORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG! 9 pages of utter tripe
  9. typical....posters on here all too quick to say, 'the incident didn't happen' and call the victim for alledgely being arrested. how about 'support your fellow football fan' which is being bleated on the "incident in the main stand lower" thread....if people can't even sympathise with an Oldhamer who unfortunately got attacked by knife wielding leeds fans (who themselves are all too quick to call the Turks for the Leeds' fans stabbings a few years back), then what hope have we got? Good to see the community spirit amongst Oldham fans on this board is alive and well. Maybe the posters discrediting Tindall might want to take a look at themselves and hope that they too never get caught in the wrong place at the wrong time. Well done all.
  10. yes it does, it's a subject of a heated arguement at work.
  11. Is it true the floodlights at Boundary Park use to belong to Man City? I've been told that when City redeveloped Main Road they sold Latics the floodlights because their new floodlights were built in the stands.
  12. I am all in favour about raising money for a good cause, but does anybody think the money should be going to the scoreboard appeal instead?
  13. Didn't Latics offer that for this season.
  14. Here's two excuses- Leicester a week on Saturday The recession
  15. think we tried to sign Marques on loan a couple of years back, after Shez rated him for his display against us in the Coca Cola cup....
  16. u do know that it was stockport in the large bit of the RRE don't u?
  17. did well today...kept the game flowing and allowed all the hard but fair challenges that u'd expect from a derby. better than most of the officials we've had to endure this season (and the season before, and the season before....)
  18. i'd definately try and accomodate Davies in the starting 11. Will be well up for it.
  19. i know, just the type of player we needed - speed on both flanks would have set us up nicely. reck ainsworth's gone for £100k - probably the same amount he cost watford when he left hereford initially. missed out on a good 'un there i reck.
  20. which considering Kalala was on £100k, the Hughes deal was good business.
  21. didnt he do an interview with the telegraph or guardian just after his release. it stated in there that he was on £80k, which is presumably right considering they actually interviewed him.
  22. speaking of banning orders etc., I actually know someone who got exactly that for "being drunk entering a sport stadium". didnt a similar incident happen to a Boro fan or summat? He fell asleep at the game, and stewards / police ejected him believing him to be drunk, gave him a banning order etc., only to be proven that he'd finished work about an hour before the game after working a twelve hour night shift. time to give up leeslover. no standing, no drinking, no atmosphere.
×
×
  • Create New...