DerekWilson_1968 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I was never really sure why everyone got over excited about our new midfield quartet, and tonight I have seen what I thought I feared. Are they destructive - yes. The problem is that they don't have an ounce of imagination in their game. Despite the fact that PA & KP ran their collective bollocks off, they never once saw a ball of any meaningful purpose. Our midfield is :censored:e - forget all the expectations. Derek. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wozz_oafc Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I was never really sure why everyone got over excited about our new midfield quartet, and tonight I have seen what I thought I feared. Are they destructive - yes. The problem is that they don't have an ounce of imagination in their game. Despite the fact that PA & KP ran their collective bollocks off, they never once saw a ball of any meaningful purpose. Our midfield is :censored:e - forget all the expectations. Derek. I doubt it can be any worse than last year. Might as well give these guys a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shefflatic Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I was never really sure why everyone got over excited about our new midfield quartet, and tonight I have seen what I thought I feared. Are they destructive - yes. The problem is that they don't have an ounce of imagination in their game. Despite the fact that PA & KP ran their collective bollocks off, they never once saw a ball of any meaningful purpose. Our midfield is :censored:e - forget all the expectations. Derek. Yeah and Allott and Maher had purpose and the ability to actually run on grass didnt they.. Sod off moaning Derek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerekWilson_1968 Posted August 18, 2009 Author Share Posted August 18, 2009 Yeah and Allott and Maher had purpose and the ability to actually run on grass didnt they.. Sod off moaning Derek Looks like you ain't been. They were shockingly poor tonight. Derek. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shefflatic Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 Looks like you ain't been. They were shockingly poor tonight. Derek. Heard LP commentary, Furman and Worthington were everywhere and both attacked well, taylor and parker sounded quiet. I think our problem is lack of width - when smalley and purdie return this will allow parker and the midfield more chance to get in the box and get forward, there is only taylor who gives us pace from the wings at the moment. millwall are a decent side and it sounded like we were very unlucky to not get a point at least - PA's pen goes in its a different game, these things happen. i'd be more worried about getting another cb and a striker to replace COG and LA quality wise to go with PA, KP and DB than the midfield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Ronnie Moore Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 We should play Parker on the left or right side of midfield and start with Abbott and Byfield up front next match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie Whitehall Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 Looks like you ain't been. They were shockingly poor tonight. Derek. No they weren't Derek, we played quite well tonight and they knocked it about quite well. Parker and Abbott recieved a lot of the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveoafc77 Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 "Don't argue with an idiot, he'll drag you down to his level and beat you on experience" no comment on this thread then! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 We should play Parker on the left or right side of midfield and start with Abbott and Byfield up front next match. That would be my call, but I've only seen 90 minutes of them so far. Is it a problem of needing to judge solidity v width. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 From what i've heard and seen ... - Furman hasnt stopped runnign for the 4 games he's player - Worthington has been solid, not letting much past him - Taylor been quiet since he picked up his injury but was very damging in pre season - Holdsworth been playing well in midfield, creating lots of chances & earning 2 penalties. Sorry if people disagree but this is what i've heard from various people on the board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 I was never really sure why everyone got over excited about our new midfield quartet, and tonight I have seen what I thought I feared. Are they destructive - yes. The problem is that they don't have an ounce of imagination in their game. Despite the fact that PA & KP ran their collective bollocks off, they never once saw a ball of any meaningful purpose. Our midfield is :censored:e - forget all the expectations. Derek. I'm not sure that many did 'get over excited' - Furman yes - he definitely has something extra. Taylor is still carrying an injury and a shadow of the player he was - the other two are solid midfielders. I think most of us on this board are realistic about our chances this season - mid table beckons. So 'a bag of :censored:e'? Not really - just playing to expectations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quark Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 From what i've heard and seen ... - Furman hasnt stopped runnign for the 4 games he's player - Worthington has been solid, not letting much past him - Taylor been quiet since he picked up his injury but was very damging in pre season - Holdsworth been playing well in midfield, creating lots of chances & earning 2 penalties. Sorry if people disagree but this is what i've heard from various people on the board. In the two matches I have seen, Taylor has been well marked most of the time but I agree he has been a bit under par. Furman not as creative as I had expected but what a worker. Totally agree about Worthington and Holdsworth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dish Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 (edited) why don't you have a moan about your job whilst you're at it Derek? ps. didn't see you at Orient on Saturday, so how can you comment? Edited August 19, 2009 by dish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpTheLatics Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 No they weren't Derek, we played quite well tonight and they knocked it about quite well. Parker and Abbott recieved a lot of the ball. Agreed. We easily had equal, if not more, possession last night, which away from home twice on the bounce isn't that bad. Millwall rushed us, and we rushed ourselves on a few occasions, but with such a congested midfield it's difficult to retain possession when trying to go forward. We took our time instead of constant, blind punts upfield, which I'm happy with whilst they're still getting to know each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksBlue Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 I was never really sure why everyone got over excited about our new midfield quartet, and tonight I have seen what I thought I feared. Are they destructive - yes. The problem is that they don't have an ounce of imagination in their game. Despite the fact that PA & KP ran their collective bollocks off, they never once saw a ball of any meaningful purpose. Our midfield is :censored:e - forget all the expectations. Derek. I've been to each of the first three league games. After Orient I posted .. "We played with "bite" in midfield and we chased and harried for every ball... However, we do seem to lack in imagination and creativity. With a couple of exceptions the midfield dont thread balls through, and in fact the midfield was often by bypassed with the long ball overhead to Pavel. To his credit Pavel held the ball up well waiting for supporting players, or laying the ball off from head and foot. But other teams will soon work this out and, aside from Pavel, we did not have much attacking edge. On other days, like Stockport last week, we will boss the midfield but with no alternative striking options, we end up nil nil at best." At Millwall we had the same shape as we did at Orient, but for some reason we were much tighter through the centre of midfield, and we had no width. Both of their goals came from spreading the ball wide and then getting it into the danger zone, and on both occasions we were stretched. And because we played with more with, the "bite" in our midfield was diminshed .. they simply played the ball around us. As for real creativity, it was still VERY limited. Pavel had a quieter game (but was still decent) but we had few alternatives apart from 2/3 runs through from midfield over 90 minutes. So after 3 games, I think we are about where we deserve to be W1 D1 L1. And I think over the full season that's where we'll end up. But the're will be ups and downs to get excited about .. looking at all results so far, this league seems a lot more even than most people predicted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 Errr, I agree with the moaner. Our midfield was lacking in imagination. What's the problem with that? They worked hard, granted, but they didn't offer anything in the way of attacking threat. The only time we really looked purposeful was when we got the penalty, which was then taken by someone wearing a slipper. As BucksBlue said, creativity = limited. Anyone who thinks otherwise just wasn't there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankly Mr Shankly Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 Errr I don't agree with the moaner. Because it's Derk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytrap Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 As long as we show more commitment and fight than we did last season, when after november most of the players looked like they wanted to be tucked up in bed, I'll be happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.