mattyg101 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 A 'league two player' said that Alan Sheehan was originally put forward by Leeds as a part payment for Taylor but it was regected and hence he moved on to Swindon. Id have taken that, Sheehan + a fee would have been an excellent deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Sinnott Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 This story appears too often for there to be no truth in it. I would take £300,000 for him. Massively over rated and always "ill". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edhunteruk Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 This story appears too often for there to be no truth in it. I would take £300,000 for him. Massively over rated and always "ill". doesnt really matter how over rated or how ill he gets,if they are willing to pay stupid money for him its our gain i think on his day and when he is fully fit he is a decent prospect and can rip a defence apart and put in a decent cross...and thats why there looking for a deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Dowds Green Shirt Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 doesnt really matter how over rated or how ill he gets,if they are willing to pay stupid money for him its our gain i think on his day and when he is fully fit he is a decent prospect and can rip a defence apart and put in a decent cross...and thats why there looking for a deal "Taylor's not playing because he's been sold to Leeds already" "If the club aren't playing taylor because they have sold him why aren't they telling us." "Taylor will sign for Leeds on the 1st January and Latics have agreed not to play him again" Where are all these posters now. It's the 6th January, Taylor has re-appeared in the team, but all these "my reliable/inside who is never/rarely wrong" are nowhere to be seen. CT may well be sold during this window. There again he might not be. Conspiracy theories!!!!! phaw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny punkster Posted January 6, 2010 Author Share Posted January 6, 2010 "Taylor's not playing because he's been sold to Leeds already" "If the club aren't playing taylor because they have sold him why aren't they telling us." "Taylor will sign for Leeds on the 1st January and Latics have agreed not to play him again" Where are all these posters now. It's the 6th January, Taylor has re-appeared in the team, but all these "my reliable/inside who is never/rarely wrong" are nowhere to be seen. CT may well be sold during this window. There again he might not be. Conspiracy theories!!!!! phaw i think you are reading too much into these anglers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Dowds Green Shirt Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 i think you are reading too much into these anglers! Sounds fishy to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny punkster Posted January 6, 2010 Author Share Posted January 6, 2010 (cue lots of fish references) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 (cue lots of fish references) The club get slagged off however they manage these situations. They are really between a rock and a hard plaice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottantuno Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 The club get slagged off however they manage these situations. They are really between a rock and a hard plaice. He should have been sold in the summer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 "Taylor's not playing because he's been sold to Leeds already" "If the club aren't playing taylor because they have sold him why aren't they telling us." "Taylor will sign for Leeds on the 1st January and Latics have agreed not to play him again" Where are all these posters now. It's the 6th January, Taylor has re-appeared in the team, but all these "my reliable/inside who is never/rarely wrong" are nowhere to be seen. CT may well be sold during this window. There again he might not be. Conspiracy theories!!!!! phaw I cod not believe how people could be so certainn he had signed for Leeds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 "Taylor's not playing because he's been sold to Leeds already" "If the club aren't playing taylor because they have sold him why aren't they telling us." "Taylor will sign for Leeds on the 1st January and Latics have agreed not to play him again" Where are all these posters now. It's the 6th January, Taylor has re-appeared in the team, but all these "my reliable/inside who is never/rarely wrong" are nowhere to be seen. CT may well be sold during this window. There again he might not be. Conspiracy theories!!!!! phaw Similar ones this time last year about Hughes..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpTheLatics Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 J-Beck hands in transfer request... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bensonio Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 These taylor rumours are kinda like the hoki-koki...its like Benitez saying barbel is worth 12 million...I'll only believe it when I see it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.