ah_oafc Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 http://www.oldhamathletic.co.uk/page/NewsU...2049498,00.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddog Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 http://www.oldhamathletic.co.uk/page/NewsU...2049498,00.html Jeez, that double negative in your title had me a little worried! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ah_oafc Posted May 12, 2010 Author Share Posted May 12, 2010 How do i change it? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Does the 'question mark' at the end negate the negation and turn it into a positive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ah_oafc Posted May 12, 2010 Author Share Posted May 12, 2010 2 Negatives make a positive ;D erm... how do i edit the title? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsLee Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 already got a thread for this havent we ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jac Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 So why weren't the players paid anything over their basic wages? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 So why weren't the players paid anything over their basic wages? They did not deserve it? Are you 100% sure about that? All the players? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsLee Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 So why weren't the players paid anything over their basic wages? because they dont deserve it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jac Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 because they dont deserve it ? Ok, the majority don't but the club can't just not pay them for that reason. I know of one player particularly. Not sure about the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsLee Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 maybe something in contract that if they havnt played x amount of games or something then they dont get it ? could be a number of things. people well latics fans especially jump to conclusion far to fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Ok, the majority don't but the club can't just not pay them for that reason. Depends. The bonuses could be non-contractual. (I suspect they aren't.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 (edited) Ok, the majority don't but the club can't just not pay them for that reason. I know of one player particularly. Not sure about the others. That was becasue that player did not supply AH with the contractually agreed first born for his cellar. EDit actually it might have been becasue he did not take his turn goig to Tesco's. ARe you sure they did not jsut make a mistake and sort it? Edited May 12, 2010 by singe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jac Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 That was becasue that player did not supply AH with the contractually agreed first born for his cellar. EDit actually it might have been becasue he did not take his turn goig to Tesco's. ARe you sure they did not jsut make a mistake and sort it? All I know is that the player collected wage slip on Fri before Yeovil to find that only basic pay was there. They were due additional payments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsLee Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 argh well, they dont deserve any little extra pay packages after the dismal season they had !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tangerinedreams Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 All I know is that the player collected wage slip on Fri before Yeovil to find that only basic pay was there. They were due additional payments. And boy o boy do I know how that feels, still nowww I can see why the performance was shoddy......Wheres Mark Crossley's wet glove? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 (edited) All I know is that the player collected wage slip on Fri before Yeovil to find that only basic pay was there. They were due additional payments. Not being funny with you Jac, well a bit as you insuinuated it, but it is a huge jump (maybe I have caught the cynical bug today) to find this rumour starts at a player only being paid his basic wage one Friday to we are going into admin. I did not get paid my salary increase in Jan last year. Nor in Feb. Finally got sorted properly in April. Adn then they only sodding well buggered it up in Jan this year again, and sorted it in March. It was HR pure and simple. I did not assume our company was going under. Our site alone take in £100m a year, and the company as a whole $26 billion . I was a bit annoyed, but it was hardly signalling the end of the company Edited May 12, 2010 by singe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tangerinedreams Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Not being funny with you Jac, well a bit as you insuinuated it, but it is a huge jump (maybe I have caught the cynical bug today) to find this rumour starts at a player only being paid his basic wage one Friday to we are going into admin. I did not get paid my salary increase in Jan last year. Nor in Feb. Finally got sorted properly in April. Adn then they only sodding well buggered it up in Jan this year again, and sorted it in March. It was HR pure and simple. I did not assume our company was going under. Our site alone take in £100m a year, and the company as a whole $26 billion . I was a bit annoyed, but it was hardly signalling the end of the company Nor the excuse for you to put poor performances at work I would hasten to add? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluehobbit Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 The players havent been paid appearance or bonus money thats definatly true. Admin has been rumored for the last few weeks around BP by a few people but could that just be nerves? DId this happpen to players lat time we went into admin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 It was HR pure and simple. *sees red rag* You take that back! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Nor the excuse for you to put poor performances at work I would hasten to add? Nope siree, that's becasue I spend too much time on here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 *sees red rag* You take that back! It was though.! But it is a good point, they are good guys, I like them. They made a mistake. I did not go moaning to everyone else at wrok adn who I know that they cocked it up, I just gave them chance (well more than one!) to sort it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 It was though.! But it is a good point, they are good guys, I like them. They made a mistake. I did not go moaning to everyone else at wrok adn who I know that they cocked it up, I just gave them chance (well more than one!) to sort it. I gathered that they often struggle to meet payroll, it is a cse of whether some money they are due gets there in time or Mr Blitz or Mr Gazal need to get their hands on enough ready cash to cover it. When L & E and I were in there the were sorting it out and Corney suggested to Joy that they hold fire on a couple of salaries (at a guess Joy and Hardy's) for a day or two until the got funds in, it could just be something like that. Bear in mind that in a typical month we donlt have enough to pay the bills, that's why we make a loss. Anyway, HR are a set of bellends, all companies, all over the world, without a single exception. Most of them are queer too. I didn't get paid last month until the expiry of two days of people in London being too busy to sign a piece of paper, and then had to get through the combined Western and Islamic weeks and the UK Bank Holiday. And then wait another, "cockhead," day while they sorted it. Obviously my bank had also blocked my account as the thought it a bit odd that my card hadn't been used in England for ten days but someone was trying to draw cash in a foreign land every ten minutes, but then Natwest are tossbags as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 already got a thread for this havent we ? For the old or the new thread title? Me head is capsizing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.