Jump to content

Matt Smith


Recommended Posts

Matt Smith - recently he has played a bit part role coming on from the bench with very little time to get into the flow of the game or make a real difference. Even in the short time he is on the field of play he seems to get a clear chance but invariably he fails to take the chance when it arrives.

 

So I hear you ask 'bigdog are you mad in wanting him to start on Tuesday'? maybe( :blink:) I reply, but I would love to see him get a full game or two when I believe he would be taking the chances that come his way.

 

Yesterday the change with Morais and Smith was designed to get crosses into the box and work the Wednesday centre backs - it almost paid off late on.

 

Let's go for it on Tuesday and get at Southend (who lost three nil yesterday):

 

4-4-1-1 with Smith as the furthest forward I say... :getmecoat:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see him get a good run of games as he's looked good when we play to his strengths and he definitely has a talent that we should be looking to develop.

 

But I'd rather put him in against Charlton or in other league games this month than on Tuesday. The style that we play at the moment relies mainly on mobility and players who can do things with the ball at their feet. The times I've seen Smith play we've slipped into the habit of launching the ball long to him and doing that on Tuesday would have too much of a radical effect on the rest of the team in a game of such importance.

 

If Taylor is fit then I'd bring Scapuzzi inside to play Simpson's role, if not I'd keep Scapuzzi left and play Morais through the middle even though Smith's done better the Filipe so far this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love Taylor to be fit as although he has been way below his best we have missed his outlet. Like Luca a lot but he is extremely lightweight in challenges (more so than Tayls!) and would love to see him in the hole, as we have seen he loves to drift. Doubt Tayls is gona be fit so expect Adeyemi advanced in front of Furman and Wes and Scap & Parker a little more advanced supporting Shefki from the flanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love Taylor to be fit as although he has been way below his best we have missed his outlet. Like Luca a lot but he is extremely lightweight in challenges (more so than Tayls!) and would love to see him in the hole, as we have seen he loves to drift. Doubt Tayls is gona be fit so expect Adeyemi advanced in front of Furman and Wes and Scap & Parker a little more advanced supporting Shefki from the flanks.

 

That could work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-4-1-1 as Smith furtherest forward? That could work, but that means dropping Kuqi. Don't think Kuqi can play in the hole, ball-retention etc is poor with him. If we carry on 4-4-1-1 then Scapuzzi or Morais in the hole. If we play Scapuzzi there, please can no one hit it in the air to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was unlucky with his header as 2-0, if that had gone in they may have wobbled. He should have got it on target but with his lack of opportunities recently it is understandable how he missed.

 

Tuesday is probably too big a game to start with him but he should be given more "pitch time" even if I do hate that phrase over christmas, too many games for Kuqi to clock up 90 in all of them.

Edited by beag_teeets
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Tuesday I think we'll go 4-4-1-1 again and I don't think it will be Smith.

 

Cisak

 

Lee, Black, Clarke, Diamond

 

Morais, Wesolowski, Furman, Scappuzzi

 

Kuqi, Parker

 

 

 

(Personally I'd go with Scappuzzi in the hole, but I'm stating what I think Dickov will do).

 

As for Smith, I'd still have him on the bench, but think he needs more than the 10 or 15 minutes Dickov has been giving him from there. I think others are ahead of him in the pecking order and rightly so, but he is certainly a completely different tpye of threat, whereas Taylor, Scappuzzi, Parker, Morais et al.

 

Kuqi and Smith together? I suspect Kuqi would have more about him than the others for latching on to the flick ons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Smith - recently he has played a bit part role coming on from the bench with very little time to get into the flow of the game or make a real difference. Even in the short time he is on the field of play he seems to get a clear chance but invariably he fails to take the chance when it arrives.

 

So I hear you ask 'bigdog are you mad in wanting him to start on Tuesday'? maybe( :blink:) I reply, but I would love to see him get a full game or two when I believe he would be taking the chances that come his way.

 

Yesterday the change with Morais and Smith was designed to get crosses into the box and work the Wednesday centre backs - it almost paid off late on.

 

Let's go for it on Tuesday and get at Southend (who lost three nil yesterday):

 

4-4-1-1 with Smith as the furthest forward I say... :getmecoat:

Not for me. The replay on Tuesday is far too big a game to throw Smith back in. I imagine Morais will partner Kuqi or Scapuzzi will move up top with Fil out wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Tuesday I think we'll go 4-4-1-1 again and I don't think it will be Smith.

 

Cisak

 

Lee, Black, Clarke, Diamond

 

Morais, Wesolowski, Furman, Scappuzzi

 

Kuqi, Parker

 

 

 

(Personally I'd go with Scappuzzi in the hole, but I'm stating what I think Dickov will do).

 

As for Smith, I'd still have him on the bench, but think he needs more than the 10 or 15 minutes Dickov has been giving him from there. I think others are ahead of him in the pecking order and rightly so, but he is certainly a completely different tpye of threat, whereas Taylor, Scappuzzi, Parker, Morais et al.

 

Kuqi and Smith together? I suspect Kuqi would have more about him than the others for latching on to the flick ons.

I'm more concerned by your plan to play Black as centre half and Diamond left back!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cisak

 

 

Lee Diamond Clarke Black

 

 

Parker Furman Wes Scapuzzi

 

 

Morais

 

 

Kuqi

 

if Fil plays anywhere for us he is always best behind the striker, where he can run at dfenders and get a shot off which he is good at doing.

 

Wasted on the right wing as he does not track back/doesn't seem fit enough to defend and attack at high energy.

Edited by shefflatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cisak

 

 

Lee Diamond Clarke Black

 

 

Parker Furman Wes Scapuzzi

 

 

Morais

 

 

Kuqi

 

if Fil plays anywhere for us he is always best behind the striker, where he can run at dfenders and get a shot off which he is good at doing.

 

Wasted on the right wing as he does not track back/doesn't seem fit enough to defend and attack at high energy.

If taylor isn't fit enough this is what i'd start with, we need to come out of the traps for this one and get in the ascendency as quickly as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cisak

 

 

Lee Diamond Clarke Black

 

 

Parker Furman Wes Scapuzzi

 

 

Morais

 

 

Kuqi

 

if Fil plays anywhere for us he is always best behind the striker, where he can run at dfenders and get a shot off which he is good at doing.

 

Wasted on the right wing as he does not track back/doesn't seem fit enough to defend and attack at high energy.

 

I'd play this team but it's definitely a gamble playing Morais on current form. Still if there's a position to take a gamble it's in that attacking midfield position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...