Dave_Og Posted January 31, 2023 Share Posted January 31, 2023 31 minutes ago, oafcmetty said: Down here it's probably less off cameras and more using the data from the bloke in the stand tapping on his phone, providing the data feed to bookies etc. But yes, computers. So, subjective then. As @TheBigDog says, depends on quality of input data Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted January 31, 2023 Share Posted January 31, 2023 18 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: So, subjective then. As @TheBigDog says, depends on quality of input data GIGO we called it *Garbage In, Garbage Out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frizzell54 Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 On 1/31/2023 at 12:35 PM, TheBigDog said: I worked for many years on IT software that was built to manipulate and interpret historical information to determine likelihood of things happening in the future. These packages use algorithms and similar to ‘predict’ potential outcomes. The outputs typically determine the propensity for things to happen - the accuracy of results depends on two main things: 1. The quality of the data going in 2. The ability of those reviewing the output to apply the insights gained I suspect that at our level, the data gathering will be minimal and therefore the outputs will not provide great insight. Like climate and COVID models then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.