daznathe

what happens if they swap him? or say spurs buy him and bellamy for £20m and value micah at 50p??

how good would a bidding war be for him. we dont want him moving in a multi player deal tho or we will get raped

quality

yeah that was my view. i read it in the chron tho, so prob not true

the net?

if this is the case then it also slipped my attention..

must admit i was sulkin a bit about my season ticket after the owners quit the board, but if we keep taylor and abbott, added to feeney, jones, lee we could do alrite. dickovs attitude cud also be perfect for underachievers such as furman, smalley, alice etcetera. goddam season hurry up..

yeah but i dont think i can make any of them! dickov out. who does this club think they are? they should just all quit and fold and bloody jews and blah blah blah..

yeah he had a slightly grander scheme up his sleeve. doubt he will be interested now, due to the backwards council and nimbyism.

+1 so open he alludes to contingencies??? yeah thanks im well relieved now.

its almost sold out. whats the capacity? theyve still got the temp stands up from eng v aus..

depends on the postcode

even if you had been living in hartlepool? and barnsley?

well im pretty sure they will. time will tell, at least ill be happy if im wrong, pal. for the record, even if they do leave here richer id say well done. if anybody is stupid enough to think they would have saved us, without the land and the potential profits, then theyre very silly indeed.

ill be there

i think you need to go back through all of what tta have said, mate. you need to take a look at what they originally said the bp site was worth, and the cost of the failsworth ground. failing that you can have a look at the amount of land they have aquired, mate. they havent given us anything, mate.

his wallet wont be lighter in the long run, he hasnt given us anything, hes lent it to us.

no we wouldnt because tta would have sold the land before they allowed building, the losers would have been the builders. the council turfs people out of their homes and allows private companies to build 'better' ones for different people. so they could quite easily have told the coffin dodgers that the football ground was there when they bought their houses, and the owners of the land are building some new houses aswell. when they messed that up and they decided to help by proposing the failsworth ground, they met new resistance. the key point being the land is not theirs to give, the land has been protected since the 1940's. so what do the council do? they check the records back to the 1970's then smuggly announce they can give the land away. this annoys the resistance even more, so much more that they bother to check the real records and hey presto the council cant do this. so we get more wasted months of yes we can no you cant yes we can no you cant meanwhile two amigos think 'sod this crappy backwards town and its retaded council, were going home' in light of this, though, i do think i charged headlong onto my percentages. and whilst not a million miles away, they are right now 5% tta 45% oldham full stop. the fans, the none fans, the dodgers, the weather, the resistance 54% the council 1% the council logo

an inifnate amount of miles wide, as ever insignificant? the crash that has scared off tta came in the delay.

yes i can blame them. id say around 20%, with 20% going on the fans, 10% the oldham public and the rest can be lumped on the council.

whoever wants to buy it will have to at least repay the 'loans' to tta. rough guess £7m

Transfers (Gameweek / Overall): 0 / 0 and i still finished 15th. good that methinks.

maybe hes had a heads up on the prospects, and thats why hes done one. maybe.

No.

unless there was an injunction on the story?