Jump to content

Wozzer

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    1,119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wozzer

  1. There's a 27 page thread for that at the top of the board ;)
  2. Whilst I completely agree we do seem to be missing the fact that Evans © is currently guilty of nothing and Evans (S) is a convicted criminal. Still, as a bleeding heart liberal who hopes that rehabilitation of offenders exists, I would employ both.
  3. He's retweeting Britain First stuff now too. He might have issues.
  4. Particularly on Walker who I think has been outstanding. Mind you I have watched a lot of Connor Brown the past few years.
  5. More tweets from the man supposedly itk suggest Evans was introduced to staff as new gaffer at 4pm yesterday.
  6. McCall is 1/5 for Bradford. Mind you Bunn was 1/10 for us last week, 9/4 now. Bradford are clearly a better option than us at the moment so hopefully they make a decision soon to clear the way for us a bit.
  7. Perhaps they sweetened a deal for Evans by giving him half his salary up front to bung on himself when he was 11/1. I'm not being entirely serious there by the way.
  8. Redfearn under consideration twice. He's done well there.
  9. Oh, I agree. I should perhaps have been more expansive. We may be justifiably favourites at the moment, we have hardly any players after all, but I wouldn't back us at the moment. Let's see what type of squad and manager we have at the beginning of August before lumping the money on.
  10. Eat - wild boar Wrestle - zebra Pet - octopus Have I got it?
  11. Presumably greedy shareholders are interested in making money. Decisions on approval of executive pay would therefore be based on the success of the executives in question. If the greedy shareholders are happy, then the executives deserve larger rewards. Otherwise they are disincentivised to make their shareholders happy. *stares at Labour Party membership card and thinks "did I really just type that"*
  12. Maybe it'll allow you to understand my response to the post in question too. Other people seem to have managed it.
  13. Spot on. I'm amazed transfer fees aren't kept more secretive than they have been. It gives competitors significant financial information about each other and any future transactions that they may wish to undertake with that club. Simon Brooke may well have access to all the information he needs to carry out his duty, putting that information into the public domain so that other League one clubs can have a good nosy really isn't part of that duty.
  14. You're labouring this every penny point too much BP. By definition that would mean looking into the salary details of every employee. It's simply not happening, nor should it. I'm no expert on data protection but it would probably be illegal too.
×
×
  • Create New...