Jump to content

MotM - Port Vale (a)


Man of the Match  

36 members have voted

  1. 1. Select your choice

    • Oxley
      25
    • Kusunga
      3
    • Mellor
      0
    • Tarkowski
      0
    • Grounds
      0
    • Smith
      0
    • Harkins
      0
    • Wesolowski
      4
    • MacDonald
      0
    • Philliskirk
      0
    • Dayton
      3
    • Clarke-Harris
      0
    • Petrasso
      1
    • Worrall
      0


Recommended Posts

In the first half Dayton looked threatening when running forwards. Despite his wayward crossing this was enough for my vote that half. In the second half no-one got it, though Oxley saved a pen and did nothing wrong he wasn't tested enough to be man of the match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the first half Dayton looked threatening when running forwards. Despite his wayward crossing this was enough for my vote that half. In the second half no-one got it, though Oxley saved a pen and did nothing wrong he wasn't tested enough to be man of the match.

 

Dayton had one of the worst performances Ive ever seen from a Latics player. If he'd had Rooney on his shirt, he'd have been attacked by the away support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Dayton had one of the worst performances Ive ever seen from a Latics player. If he'd had Rooney on his shirt, he'd have been attacked by the away support

 

I disagree. But those that were to agree I would assume would base it on his poor final ball throughout the match. A final ball that was not bettered by anyone else. I wasn't voting for who had played well, just the best of a bad bunch.

 

On a side not, why can nothing ever be just bad or poor? Nothing and no one on Saturday was the worst of anything Latics related. I've only been watching Latics for fifteen years but I've seen much worse individual performances, much worse finishing, much worse passing and much worse lack of invention than on Saturday. It was a bobbins result. But a 0-1 at Vale Park - where we've only won five times in thirty-odd attempts - is nowhere near the worst of anything. There's no hope for reasoned debate with such overreactions.

 

(This isn't aimed at you youngen, it's all over this particular corner of the internet)

Edited by LaticsChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dayton worked his nuts off first half, but his delivery into the box was atrocious. Smith and Wes buzzed around, Petrasso had their full back on toast when he came on (wonder what would have happened if he'd started) but I'll go for Oxley. He looked very confident and assured and the penalty save was breathtaking. He'd actually dived too far and stuck up a big left paw to get it away. Brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We contained Vale and had them frustrated first half. Carved out a couple of decent openings and looked dangerous on the break.

Agreed. First half was very even. If we'd pushed on and won it would have no doubt on here been a great first half performance that gave us the platform to win the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dayton worked his nuts off first half, but his delivery into the box was atrocious. Smith and Wes buzzed around, Petrasso had their full back on toast when he came on (wonder what would have happened if he'd started) but I'll go for Oxley. He looked very confident and assured and the penalty save was breathtaking. He'd actually dived too far and stuck up a big left paw to get it away. Brilliant.

his delivery into the box is 80% of what he,s paid for , to assist and score goals, so he.s only 80% crap,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I disagree. But those that were to agree I would assume would base it on his poor final ball throughout the match. A final ball that was not bettered by anyone else. I wasn't voting for who had played well, just the best of a bad bunch.

 

On a side not, why can nothing ever be just bad or poor? Nothing and no one on Saturday was the worst of anything Latics related. I've only been watching Latics for fifteen years but I've seen much worse individual performances, much worse finishing, much worse passing and much worse lack of invention than on Saturday. It was a bobbins result. But a 0-1 at Vale Park - where we've only won five times in thirty-odd attempts - is nowhere near the worst of anything. There's no hope for reasoned debate with such overreactions.

 

(This isn't aimed at you youngen, it's all over this particular corner of the internet)

 

It wasnt an over reaction, Im basing this on the fact Dayton is actually a quality player and on Saturday was IMO the worst player on the pitch. He wasted so many opportunities, needlessly gave away the penalty and was far too weak up against that Grimmer at RB who was laughably bad. Petrasso made him look a fool a couple of times when brought on.

 

The rest were very poor, posibly Wes was ok, but he gave away too many fouls even for him and was lucky not to receive a card.

 

Smith needs to step up as captain and lead forward, so many times he gets in behind their midfield only to play it wide to a full back, rather than drive forward and having a pop. He needs to becoming more attacking minded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It wasnt an over reaction, Im basing this on the fact Dayton is actually a quality player and on Saturday was IMO the worst player on the pitch. He wasted so many opportunities, needlessly gave away the penalty and was far too weak up against that Grimmer at RB who was laughably bad. Petrasso made him look a fool a couple of times when brought on.

 

The rest were very poor, posibly Wes was ok, but he gave away too many fouls even for him and was lucky not to receive a card.

 

Smith needs to step up as captain and lead forward, so many times he gets in behind their midfield only to play it wide to a full back, rather than drive forward and having a pop. He needs to becoming more attacking minded.

 

I'll agree he was nowhere near his usual standards but he was also nowhere near the worst player on the pitch.

 

Smith's trouble is he's trying to make things happen at the minute in a team that's on a bad run. For players like him - and with the responsibility he no doubt feels as captain - this often results in dropping deeper and deeper for the ball, which no matter how good you are makes it harder to really influence things in the final third. I suppose he needs Johnson to tell him to leave the dropping deep to Wes, who can then get the ball to Smith further up the pitch or play it wide, allowing Smith to break from midfield to get on the end of a good cross. Easier said than done though I guess.

Edited by LaticsChris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...