I'm guessing, obviously, but given the article is a pre-cursor to ManUre's excellent defeat in the CL final, the journo is trying to paint a picture of nailed-on loyalty to the scum from one of their longest-serving players. Reading the article again, the mention of Latics is really oddly placed and it kinda looks like it's been shoe-horned in. My guess is that the journo wrote it without that reference and the editor made him put something in about Latics, presumably because he'd read the 442 article/internet, etc. and knew about his Latics-supporting past. People make up quotes all the time - it's pretty much standard practice in journalism as people rarely say anything quite as coherent in real life as they do in interviews. Sometimes, these quotes are cleared with the source, but not always. I can't see Scholes being too upset either way at the comemnt attributed to him, tbh. Let's face it - it's way more interesting to us than it is to him.