Lags Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Tribunal date set for this coming Monday http://www.oldhamathletic.premiumtv.co.uk/...1401001,00.html So what should we be payin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostofcecere Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 If I was being cynical, I would say the reason we haven't played him much is that if he was a 1st team regular in a team at the top of League 1, then Bury would have a case for more money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markoasis Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 If I was being cynical, I would say the reason we haven't played him much is that if he was a 1st team regular in a team at the top of League 1, then Bury would have a case for more money I expect him to play some part agianst Stockport Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyres_28 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 If I was being cynical, I would say the reason we haven't played him much is that if he was a 1st team regular in a team at the top of League 1, then Bury would have a case for more money Disagree ... Although he shows huge potential 'n' is technically as good as anyone in club barring Lewi from wot I've seen ... albeit looks a little slow off the mark at times and has struggled to maintain first half sharpness in every match I've seen him - won't make first team consistently till next year at earliest IMHO -- But an awesome spot from the club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simpo Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 A guess: £30K up front, another £10K after 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 appearances, 20% sell-on clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ste1987 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I think it will be something along the lines of £70k plus £10k after appearances, 20% sell on. At the time we got Porter, he was also considered 'one for the future', as is dale stephens, so i'm expecting a largish amount regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I think it will be something along the lines of £70k plus £10k after appearances, 20% sell on. At the time we got Porter, he was also considered 'one for the future', as is dale stephens, so i'm expecting a largish amount regardless. Porter had scored quite a few League goals by the time he joined us, so much less of the unproven about him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Well they got 100k from Leicester up front for their other young lad, with extra 50Ks I think at three regular appearance thresholds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 If I was being cynical, I would say the reason we haven't played him much is that if he was a 1st team regular in a team at the top of League 1, then Bury would have a case for more money Nah, he's not playing because those players in the team, by performing well (and not getting injured), haven't presented the opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wardlelatic Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 We will get stuffed again by the Tribunal..... 80K down and another 50k after 30 games plus add ons or give Bury 100k final payment ! Bury have done very very well at Tribunals in the past 3 years... Wonder Why ? Step up Mr Neville Neville ... you Male chicken !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.