LaticsSideOfLife Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 (edited) http://www.oldhamathletic.co.uk/news/article/20121122-cisaksigns-500730.aspx Good luck to the lad. Glad it's only a month and we have a recall clause in the deal. Edited November 22, 2012 by LaticsSideOfLife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c.hill12 Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Good move IF it allows us to bring somebody in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 I said it on the other thread (you know, the one where someone likened Cisak to Dean Brill) but it's very sensible to loan him out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Good move for the lad. It will give him game time and he'll see plenty of the ball. It will also give Liam Jacob a taste of the first team squad, I imagine, so that should help his development too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slystallone Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Good move for the lad. It will give him game time and he'll see plenty of the ball. It will also give Liam Jacob a taste of the first team squad, I imagine, so that should help his development too. Indeed. This just makes sense all round. Cisak gets game time in the same League as us, we get a bit of income coming in (surely they'll be paying for him?) and - as we have cover in Jacob for the bench; it doesn't leave us too light - especially with the 24hr recall clause too. Aye - decent move for all parties this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiefan Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Great move, hopefully Portsmouth can come out of admin and make it permanent! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Great move, hopefully Portsmouth can come out of admin and make it permanent! If they are they'll need a spare six figure fee lying around somewhere & hope they don't get relegated, especially when they are deducted 10 points on exiting administration.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longtimeblue Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Great move, hopefully Portsmouth can come out of admin and make it permanent! Least then you'll have no reason to come on here. I think Cisak's the better keeper, you're just boring though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Great move, hopefully Portsmouth can come out of admin and make it permanent! Do shut up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c.hill12 Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 If they are they'll need a spare six figure fee lying around somewhere & hope they don't get relegated, especially when they are deducted 10 points on exiting administration.. No deduction if supporters trust buy them apparently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiefan Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Least then you'll have no reason to come on here. I think Cisak's the better keeper, you're just boring though. Think about it. Why would aussie fans be happy to have one of their best young keepers (yes, better than bouzanis) on the bench at a League one club (no disrespect) - and moreover why would you be happy to have the best keeper in League 1 on the bench!!! Clearly your gaffer has no intention of playing Cisak despite Bouzanis being haphazard (there are plenty of your fans that say that too). This is a significant move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Think about it. Why would aussie fans be happy to have one of their best young keepers (yes, better than bouzanis) on the bench at a League one club (no disrespect) - and moreover why would you be happy to have the best keeper in League 1 on the bench!!! Clearly your gaffer has no intention of playing Cisak despite Bouzanis being haphazard (there are plenty of your fans that say that too). This is a significant move. You seriously aren't for real. You are a Tranmere fan on a long term mission, or a gay stalker of Dean Brill aiming to rehabilitate his reputation, or else just a total weirdo. Or else our previous long term fake person with his own motivations. Have you met any of our fans over there yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 why would you be happy to have the best keeper in League 1 on the bench!!! Simple, because playing him would mean dropping a 'keeper than hasn't done nearly enough wrong to be dropped. Best 'keeper in League One you say? I'm more positive than most about our players abilities but even I'd say that's rubbish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLatics Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 You seriously aren't for real. You are a Tranmere fan on a long term mission, or a gay stalker of Dean Brill aiming to rehabilitate his reputation, or else just a total weirdo. Or else our previous long term fake person with his own motivations. Have you met any of our fans over there yet? :laught30: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 No deduction if supporters trust buy them apparently How? Why? Are the Football League making up rules on the hoof to suit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schlieb Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) Think about it. Why would aussie fans be happy to have one of their best young keeper (yes, better than bouzanis) on the bench at a League one club (no disrespect) - and moreover why would you be happy to have the best keeper in League 1 on the bench!!! Clearly your gaffer has no intention of playing Cisak despite bouzanis being haphazard (there are plenty of your fans that say that too). This is a significant move. I think you really need to watch some games? There's so little between Cisak and Bouzanis. Cisak rightfully lost his place and can't dislodge an in form bouzanis. Plus bouzanis' distribution is much better than cisaks, great kick on him (as in he actually aims rather than just hoofs) and when needed he'll release to the winger extremely quick. Edited November 23, 2012 by Schlieb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiefan Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I think you really need to watch some games? There's so little between Cisak and Bouzanis. Cisak rightfully lost his place and can't dislodge an in form bouzanis. Plus bouzanis' distribution is much better than cisaks, great kick on him (as in he actually aims rather than just hoofs) and when needed he'll release to the winger extremely quick. have seen the goals bouzanis concedes. He's either rooted to his line or punching thin air. His kicking is debatable. Have had a look at your team when cisak went out in came wabara, derbyshire and baxter. There are your positive results right there. Anyway. Think Oldham suits Bouzanis, Cisak best to move on to bigger club anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 have seen the goals bouzanis concedes. He's either rooted to his line or punching thin air. His kicking is debatable. Have had a look at your team when cisak went out in came wabara, derbyshire and baxter. There are your positive results right there. Anyway. Think Oldham suits Bouzanis, Cisak best to move on to bigger club anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAV Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 No deduction if supporters trust buy them apparently bull:censored: -10 as soon as they come out of admin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emfy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Aussiefan do us a favour. Keep your bias comments to yourself. Boozy has obviously got under your skin. He is Oldham's No 1 and rightly deserves to be so. Live with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Aussiefan do us a favour. Keep your bias comments to yourself. Boozy has obviously got under your skin. He is Oldham's No 1 and rightly deserves to be so. Live with it. If you hit <quote> you can reply before you hit <post> ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emfy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 If you hit <quote> you can reply before you hit <post> ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emfy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Point taken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danoafc Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 have seen the goals bouzanis concedes. He's either rooted to his line or punching thin air. His kicking is debatable. Have had a look at your team when cisak went out in came wabara, derbyshire and baxter. There are your positive results right there. Anyway. Think Oldham suits Bouzanis, Cisak best to move on to bigger club anyways. Hahahaha. Jog on, you trolling cock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.