danoafc

I suspect you'll get issue with a voucher on Sat Dave, once you've finished cashing up etc, so you can go and queue up like a good boy on Sunday morning.

What pissed me off the most about this is reading Corney :censored:ing bleating in the MEN about having to give tickets to Liverpool and sponsors etc!!! Now I wonder why all the staff have been told they have to purchase tickets?!! I should also add that the views I express on this topic are mine and mine alone!

Nobody gets 'free entry'. Volunteer staff gain entry to the ground in return for the work that they do. So it's ok for them to get entry to the ground for the Brentford game on Sat cos it'll be a crap draw that nobody will be interested in, but not gain entry to 'the big games' cos there's money to be made? Fine, charge them for a ticket but at least have the good grace to pay them for the work they do on the day! Or perhaps the club think voluntary staff will do it out if the goodness of their heart?!

In return for volunteering their time?! Including time spent away from the ground on non match days? How is that free admission?

Glad u posted that cos I promised I wouldn't! Think it's well out of order, and I wouldn't blame any of them for refusing to do whatever it is they usually do on match days if they are effectively 'just' paying customers.

This was my reaction at first, but then I remembered that under 16's had paid £10 for the full season, or 45p per game if they go to them all. £30 for 23 games including one against Liverpool? Seems like belting value to me.

I'm fine with the £25 for adults, but £20 is a bit steep for kids when it's normally £3 for U12's. Edit: That said, the kids ST's have been a great deal to be fair!

4 pages?! Jesus!

Spot on.

Appeal then, no? Problem solved.

Hmmmm, I'd be surprised, but it might explain the back room staff being put on gardening leave until further notice.

Totally agree with this. Top man Dux, thanks for everything!

Can't be arsed trawling through 7 pages on this, so apologies if somebody has made this point already, but who says PD wasn't involved in the decision to get rid of the back room team?

What? Again?

Who doesn't belong to us and likely never will….......

But all is well cos no doubt "the boys worked ever so hard". Tedious.

Hahahaha. Jog on, you trolling cock.

He's got to manage, organise and motivate that gutless set of toss pots.

Haha! He even had a spare ticket mate!! ;-)

Having been in commanding positions in 2 of those 4 and chucking them away, you know what I mean!

We NEVER get anything up there! Ah well, onto Saturday!

Totally agree. Cov @ home being a perfect illustration. He should have made the changes at the same point during that game. He didn't, he delayed and delayed and we got badly stung by it. Saturday was panning out in exactly the same manner and I could see us caving in to a scrappy goal in the last couple of minutes until PD made those substitutions. Let's hope this is a sign of hings to come.

You're absolutely right. I remember getting gripped by one of their nasty knuckle dragging fans on the main car park when I was about 16 or 17after a particularly stormy encounter at BP back in the early nineties. It was a night match and we won, that's about as much as I can remeber, but their travelling fans were a nasty horrible malicious set back then. Seems not a lot has changed in the last 20 years.

Agree with this Andy. If he's sworn at the lad then he should know better, regardless of provocation, and should be reprimanded/fined by OAFC and told to make a formally apology to the lad and to SUFC. If it transpires that he has used racially abusive terms then he deserved the book thrown at him. However, if it transpires that the allegations are false and fabricated by a group of SUFC supporters, I'd expect the police to pursue and charge those fans with wasting police time and/or attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Pretty much agree with this. The longer this goes on the worse it reflects in the image of the club who have publicly backed Croft.