24hoursfromtulsehill

Almost as good as Tony Gubba's "Mark A-lot" on MotD.

Arsenal. Most money for the club. Home game for OASIS.

He saw a real football team last Tuesday and decided to follow them. Fair play to the paternally challenged yorkshireman!

...is terrible spelling. ...is terrible grammar.

To the tune of Go West... ...Lee Hughes He's only on parole Lee Hughes He's gonna score some goals Lee Hughes Now he's done his time Lee Hughes Is wearing number nine... Or perhaps not. Sorry.

I don't know what "s***t" means, but I think it's better than the Coventry one, so I'm in. Yes. Ja. Oui.

They shouldn't have built the national stadium in London, and they shouldn't build a football centre there either, but London is quite a good place to get around by tube, bus, train, taxi, car and so on. It's got one of - if not the - best transport infrastructures in the world.

Enough. That's it. Me and you, penalty shoot out to settle it. You are absolutely clueless.

When you look at the footage, you will realise that Hughes went for placement and power. Technically, he was in the perfect position to strike the ball straight, high and hard, which he did with minimal, if any, follow through. He did not swing at it in any way shape or form. You'll not see a better or more assured penalty than that.

Southgate. Pearce!! Did you say Pearce?

That's a joke isn't it? You're yanking our chain aren't you? You saw Hughes really lay into that one on Saturday, and you reckon the tacklers are natural penalty takers. Very funny.

Does anyone remember a player from the 1970s called Paul Hughes?

What congratulations?

Here's how I saw the undercard in the Millwall scum Vs Hughes battle. Ref blows for a penalty. Davies runs toward Taylor for the ball, but Taylor throws it to Hughes. They go at it like children for a bit, then someone pulls Taylor away. Hughes bags the penalty. Anyone know what really happened?

All this chatter about his wife and his kids and the hostility and the bottles on the pitch and the dancing around and the bloody hatrick and that finish for the third... ...people seem to have forgotten that he lost his man for their second goal and should be dropped immediately, if not given a free transfer to Accrington Stanley. Sheridan out.

You can't fault his touch though.

I can't wait to see England play now - the man is a football genius. I'm struggling to remember who our last manager was, but I'm sure Capello will do better. Who was our last manager?

The chippy.

Point taken. I yield to no one in my admiration of the magnanimous, but I'm not the club (and neither is the message board), so how much harm can a little light gloating do?

They picked the fight, and they lost. No consultation. High rises filled with the worst people ever and their "families" and a space launcher for "Carlton Way". Where's my placard?

"editor"

Jesus man! If they look like ****holes, I want to see where you live.

I love the Porter but it's always rammed on a Saturday because of the market. I reckon the George.

By "consulting", I hope you mean "telling them what's what". TTA's priorities should be as follows: first, phone the wrecking-ball people when the sun comes up; secondly, go to Millwall (it's not, when all's said and done, all glamour); and, six-hundred-and-forty-fifthly, dry the residents' eyes. They don't deserve to be consulted. I think everyone knows what they would say if consulted but, after last night, no one is compelled to hear or think about it.

The Chron, as everyone knows, is rarely wrong. But I think I spotted what it's "editor" might consider to be a significant error. Last time, the committee voted, as I recall, 7-4, therefore it is not the case that "all but...one" changed their minds. I'm happy at the result, and that Mr. and Mrs. Anchor are front page news (look out Jordan and Peter), but the Chron needs a shake up. I'm sure that the reporters and staff of the paper would join me in asking the question: what does the "editor" do all day?