Scapegoat Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 (edited) Latics get away with £260k Proportionally though, we paid a lot more back than most of the others. Wonder why? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7741859.stm Edited - Link didn't work. Not sure how to do them. Tried again with the straight link Edited November 23, 2008 by Scapegoat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboafc Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 removed, please view the BBC website for a full listing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmr Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 (edited) Its a disgrace the amount Leeds, Leicester and McDons have paid considering the money they throw around. How do McDons get away with paying nothing? Edited November 23, 2008 by cmr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 (edited) At the Creditors' (including season ticket hilders) meeting on 8th January 2004 in the same Council Chamber where we had the Planning Committee meetings last year, Administrators PKF succesfully sought approval for a Creditors' Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). This provided for the Inland Revenue and HM Customs and Excise to receive 32 pence in the pound on their debt. Other creditors (including lots of small businesses and Iain Dowie*) received nothing. The Administrators needed a Creditors' Committee to be formed and, after nobody would volunteer, I along with Mrs. S. and another OWTB member volunteered and had the inaugural meeting straight away in part of the Queen Elizabeth Hall compex. * Lights the blue touchpaper and stands back! Edited November 23, 2008 by Diego_Sideburns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I was listening to five live earlier on today and the report was heavily featured on there. Albeit we owe the tax man £260k, we are still paying 50p in the pound, clubs like Leeds, Leicester and Bradford who although are paying more are only paying 1p in the pound (so 1% of what they owe). I know we are paying more slightly voluntarily and didn't get punished with a points loss unlike some of the others but for us to be paying back 50 times as much relatively compared to others in the same division is a bit wrong. I think something does need to be done about this though and a footballer shouldn't get all his money back just because he is in football, Leeds owe money to some very rich footballers indeed and they will receive all of the money owed to them. But the tax payer/man doesn't get all the money owed to him. I understand why football is a special case as clubs owed money wouldn't then receive the money they are owed by a team in debt otherwise but think that the taxman/ payer should get more back than 1p in the pound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 It's nothing to do with football or which division you are in - it's simple accountancy. You may as well compare all the businesses with an O and an L in the name. The business can't be resurrected as a going concern without settling footballing debts as it wouldn't be allowed back in by the FA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 (edited) The whole concept of clubs deliberately overspending on players and wages, not setting aside money for tax and national insurance on those wages, going in to administration and escaping debt via a CVA and carrying on trading afterwards is wrong. Latics were bloody lucky that the points penalty didn't exist at the time Chris Moore destroyed the business. While the points penalties introduced by the Football League are right, they still don't address the general financial mismanagement of football clubs, driven by excessive player wages at all levels of the game. If stories are to be believed, the likes of Neil Kilkenny earning an average Leeds wage of £10k a week, or Liam Dickinson never playing a first team game for Derby but drawing £6k a week would be good examples of wages outside the premiership. 5,000 attendance, average admission cost £12 = £60k a game x 23 games = £1.38m. So Latics in 2008 cold effectively afford to field a team of 3 - 2 x Kilkenneys and a Dickinson as long as they don't pay any rates, employ any backroom staff (luxuries like a manager and stuff) or pick up any other bills along the way. Edited November 23, 2008 by opinions4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAV Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 (edited) The whole concept of clubs deliberately overspending on players and wages, not setting aside money for tax and national insurance on those wages, going in to administration and escaping debt via a CVA and carrying on trading afterwards is wrong. Latics were bloody lucky that the points penalty didn't exist at the time C***s M***e destroyed the business. While the points penalties introduced by the Football League are right, they still don't address the general financial mismanagement of football clubs, driven by excessive player wages at all levels of the game. Never mention THAT name Edited November 23, 2008 by SAV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 The business can't be resurrected as a going concern without settling footballing debts as it wouldn't be allowed back in by the FA. The CVA had to be approved before the Football League would agree to the transfer of League membership to the new Oldham Athletic company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 The CVA had to be approved before the Football League would agree to the transfer of League membership to the new Oldham Athletic company. It goes beyond that Diego - the FL have no special say in the processing of the liabilities and assets of the failed business, but it is part of their rules that the Phoenix company can't adopt the previous League position unless they pay all the football related liabilities in full. This means that the other creditors, including the taxman, are left with less choice in what they will accept as the whole thing will be wound up if it isn't able to proceed as a football club. In a strange way it might be an argument for keeping the ownership of the ground away from the club, as if they were together it might have made a higher return for the people who were owed to see the club go to the wall and the ground sold. As for Dowie, he can go piss up a rope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 It goes beyond that Diego - the FL have no special say in the processing of the liabilities and assets of the failed business, but it is part of their rules that the Phoenix company can't adopt the previous League position unless they pay all the football related liabilities in full. This means that the other creditors, including the taxman, are left with less choice in what they will accept as the whole thing will be wound up if it isn't able to proceed as a football club. That's what I was saying - the CVA required the football-related liabilities to be paid in full, leaving the 32p in the £ for the Inland Revenue and Customs & Excise. Nobody buys a football club unless they are guaranteed to get the Football League membership transferred to the new company. The only way to do that is pay fully the football liabilities. Not only Dowie, but a lot of small businesses had to "go piss up a rope", but most of them knew they would be able to do business (and recoup some of their losses) with the new company, if the Club survived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 That's what I was saying - the CVA required the football-related liabilities to be paid in full, leaving the 32p in the £ for the Inland Revenue and Customs & Excise. Nobody buys a football club unless they are guaranteed to get the Football League membership transferred to the new company. The only way to do that is pay fully the football liabilities. Not only Dowie, but a lot of small businesses had to "go piss up a rope", but most of them knew they would be able to do business (and recoup some of their losses) with the new company, if the Club survived. I realise now that all that I said was actually contained within your earlier post. I do feel a lot for the local businesses - some will have had cover against such an event, some will not. I can't recall reading about any of them stealing company cars from the club parking lot though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I realise now that all that I said was actually contained within your earlier post. I do feel a lot for the local businesses - some will have had cover against such an event, some will not. I can't recall reading about any of them stealing company cars from the club parking lot though. I can't recall reading about any of them financing the pre-season flights to N. Ireland either. Eventually an anonymous donor, believed to be red-headed, paid the other tour costs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I can't recall reading about any of them financing the pre-season flights to N. Ireland either. Eventually an anonymous donor, believed to be red-headed, paid the other tour costs. Well, Mr Tulsehill personally saw the then club captain buying butties in the shop on Rochdale Road. Maybe he added the cost to the club debts too. Dowie was trying to get money that he wasn't owed, having been on massive wages himself and demanding that we spend yet more money on top of an already vastly expensive squad. If he wants credit for putting his hand in his deep pocket at a time when so many people were doing what they could without reward, then it shows all the more about the measure of the man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 ... If he wants credit for putting his hand in his deep pocket at a time when so many people were doing what they could without reward, then it shows all the more about the measure of the man. The way I see it is that he motivated everyone at the Club to carry on, even when not being paid, until three wise men road into town with twenty four hours to go before liquidation. Without that motivation, I believe there would have been no Club for those wise men to buy. I know that a lot of money owed to Dowie (and others) was written off by that CVA. How he tried to remedy the situation is what he will always be remembered for, which is a pity in the great scheme of things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stitch_KTF Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 The way I see it is that he motivated everyone at the Club to carry on, even when not being paid, until three wise men road into town with twenty four hours to go before liquidation. Without that motivation, I believe there would have been no Club for those wise men to buy. I know that a lot of money owed to Dowie (and others) was written off by that CVA. How he tried to remedy the situation is what he will always be remembered for, which is a pity in the great scheme of things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 The way I see it is that he motivated everyone at the Club to carry on, even when not being paid, until three wise men road into town with twenty four hours to go before liquidation. Without that motivation, I believe there would have been no Club for those wise men to buy. I know that a lot of money owed to Dowie (and others) was written off by that CVA. How he tried to remedy the situation is what he will always be remembered for, which is a pity in the great scheme of things. Genuine question, how long, if ever, were the wage bills unpaid for? Including people who were on the payroll without having signed a very highly paid contract that was put in front of them but happily continuing to accept more money landing in their pay packets than people who achieved more on less resources? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc0000 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 To be quite frank, everyone of those clubs including us, should be held accountable for that money.... And if you cant pay you shouldn't trade.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I saw this yesterday and don't like the way the table is set out. I know it's petty, but if it was set out in deficit order, we would be third from bottom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsleftfoot Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Latics get away with £260k Proportionally though, we paid a lot more back than most of the others. Wonder why? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7741859.stm Edited - Link didn't work. Not sure how to do them. Tried again with the straight link Technically it was Brown When we went into administration, HMRC was still a preferential creditor therefore we had to pay back money to them first over other creditors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Genuine question, how long, if ever, were the wage bills unpaid for? Including people who were on the payroll without having signed a very highly paid contract that was put in front of them but happily continuing to accept more money landing in their pay packets than people who achieved more on less resources? I have no details about the length of time wages were unpaid. All I know is what was in the rarely wrong Chron. Wayne Andrews left because he had a family to support. Tony Carss went to Huddersfield where they were also struggling to pay wages. Alan Hardy was suspended and the Club's employees went by coach to the Torex building off the M40 in an attempt to beg you-know-who to pay their wages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 (edited) Genuine question, how long, if ever, were the wage bills unpaid for? Including people who were on the payroll without having signed a very highly paid contract that was put in front of them but happily continuing to accept more money landing in their pay packets than people who achieved more on less resources? Thanks to the excellent Oldham Advertiser archives, I've come up with these memory-jerkers. The struggles during Administration: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/s/...ublished_29_may Note: the ‘Norwegian Consortium’ proved to be a hoax. http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/s/...o_stay__for_now http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/s/465254_long_haul http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/465267_not_safe_yet The car: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/5...nder_the_hammer Still waiting to see if C**** M**** gets what his come-uppance: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/1...y_killed_latics Edited November 24, 2008 by Diego_Sideburns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Those archives are good! I don't even remember giving this interview: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/4...blished_18_june Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Thanks to the excellent Oldham Advertiser archives, I've come up with these memory-jerkers. The struggles during Administration: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/s/...ublished_29_may Note: the ‘Norwegian Consortium’ proved to be a hoax. http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/s/...o_stay__for_now http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/s/465254_long_haul http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/465267_not_safe_yet The car: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/5...nder_the_hammer Still waiting to see if C**** M**** gets what his come-uppance: http://www.oldhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/1...y_killed_latics Reading that last artical do we know what has or is likely to happen to the unmentionable one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.