Alec1954 Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 (edited) Charity Commision cannot make their minds up! Evidence both for and against is inconclusive... so OMBC to review the position and a report from their officers has been requested by 3/3/. Corney not surpised! Back to square 1???? Edited February 12, 2010 by Alec1954 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfOAFC Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 here we go again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 FAILsworth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveoafc Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Anyone got a copy of war and peace? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor_Coconut Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Or on a positive side the opponents have failed to prove that the land can't be used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ste1987 Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Or on a positive side the opponents have failed to prove that the land can't be used. Yeah thats how I viewed it more than anything. This was their final card to try and scupper the move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Or on a positive side the opponents have failed to prove that the land can't be used. You are getting regular and inexpensive sex, aren't you Coco? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 FAILsworth. I certainly hope so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longtimeblue Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 March in protest, This time in two years we can see the new plans for our 6000 all seater stadium in Longsight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcprozac Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 (edited) Or on a positive side the opponents have failed to prove that the land can't be used. Isn't this similar to what happened with Clayton playing fields, then the Action Group campaigned long enough, achieved Town Green Status and we were down the :censored:ter! Could this happen again? Edited February 12, 2010 by oafcprozac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Might this be one that goes to te Office of The Deputy Prime Miniister or Communiies and Local Goverment or whatver guise it takes these days? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboafc Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 back to square one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor_Coconut Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Isn't this similar to what happened with Clayton playing fields, then the Action Group campaigned long enough, achieved Town Green Status and we were down the :censored:ter! Could this happen again? I think it's different because it the Charity Commission can't find any evidence one way or another while it was always known that the Clayton family had given the land to the people of Oldham. If it drags on any longer than March it will become an election issue which will see us shafted imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lookers_Carl Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Would be very interesting to see what the next move of TTA would be should the charity commission rule against us. Although they have bought the land formerly owned by BA they bought that land at a knockdown price and are still free to develop that how they wish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUNGFOO Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Backwards people in charge what does anyone expect im 100% sure if a certain building was wanting planing it would have been built yesterday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 (edited) Shortly after Pine Villa became Oldham Athletic, the rarely wrong Chron commented: "It is really surprising that a first-rate Association Football Club cannot be run in Oldham for there is plenty of room for one without crippling the leading rugby club and, in addition, there is a demand for good soccer." Halfway through Latics first season there was a problem with the ground landlords (J.W. Lees) over rent and terms of the lease. No compromise could be reached and the only answer was for Latics to find another ground (back to Hudson Fold) to play on. I keep getting that feeling of déjà vu. http://www.oldhamathletic.co.uk/page/NewsU...1956319,00.html Is history about to repeat itself? Edited February 12, 2010 by Diego_Sideburns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Backwards people in charge what does anyone expect im 100% sure if a certain building was wanting planing it would have been built yesterday What's McDonalds got to do with anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Or on a positive side the opponents have failed to prove that the land can't be used. Quite. Opponents have to demonstrate that there is a restraint on the land being used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Spotland anybody? said it before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lookers_Carl Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Spotland anybody? said it before. Or even worse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Or even worse That's too big for our needs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lookers_Carl Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 That's too big for our needs. Yup, true, why the hell do we need a 6100 capacity when we only get 3500 a game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUNGFOO Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 What's McDonalds got to do with anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchie82 Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 I certainly hope so Are people so thick that they can't see if this doesn't happen we will be f**ked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garcon Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Anyone who sees the Charity Commission's inability to reach a definitive view on the status of the land as a good thing is, bluntly, wrong. Yes, the campaigners have failed in their initial bid to obtain a ruling 'against', but the failure of the Commission to reach a ruling 'for' simply leads us down the path of protracted legal proceedings that could delay any development for years. You only need to read between the lines of Cllr Uddin and Simon Corney's statements to realise a very large quantity of effluent has just collided with a hopelessly inadequate whirry object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.