Laticsbiffo Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Just had a mail from an Accy fan at work who says: "Apparently Cisak wasn't at the 1st day of pre-season training today, a lot of people think he's finalising a deal with your lot." I think the fact that Stephens has gone may allow compensation to be made avaialble to Stanley... Could be a good addition in my humble opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lookers_Carl Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 He sounds promising. Given the tight finances, if he is better than what we had then good piece of business. Am guessing that we will be going with him and Gerrard as backup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beardy Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Cisak? Werent they the aliens on land of the lost? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 He sounds promising. Given the tight finances, if he is better than what we had then good piece of business. Am guessing that we will be going with him and Gerrard as backup? Possibly Amos on loan according to rumours.. Now De Gea has signed for Utd they have 4 keepeprs.. De Gea, Lindegaard, Kuszczak and Amos.. So there is a good chance of it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 from the accy forum Nipped down to watch a hour or so of training this morning 18 were training A couple of burnley lads Couple of youth team lads Danny Coid was there No Ray putterill No Ciask....think his move to oldham is a more or less done deal thats not good, Cisak will be a bigga loss as jimmy imho, Looks like they will struggle this season, seems like they have lost half of their 1st team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakerT Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 I just can't see Amos signing on loan, we played some awful stuff when he was with us, you would think to develop his career he would want to go to a bigger club, dont get me wrong I would love him to sign. Gerrard as back up fills me with no confidence! I remember other managers relying on the kids as back up and we were forever in the loan market when we had injuries rather than blooding the kids and giving them a go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laticdickovarmy Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/accringtonstanley/news/9093782.Accrington_Stanley_keeper_faces_global_trek_for_Australia_squad/ This doesnt fill me with confidence either tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 looks our kind of player this lad - despite his name having only 5 letters there is loads of scope for mispelling & mispronouncing it as demonstrated already Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pukka Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 My mate does the sky blog for Accrington stanley - he does a lot of work with the board and is pretty well in at the club. He's just sent me a message saying we have signed him. £20k and it'll be announced officially on friday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edhunteruk Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 My mate does the sky blog for Accrington stanley - he does a lot of work with the board and is pretty well in at the club. He's just sent me a message saying we have signed him. £20k and it'll be announced officially on friday. i think in that case then he is gonna be used as a number 2 keeper...there is no way we would sign a young keeper then allow him to sod off playing 7 or 8 games for australia under 23's in what is gonna be a hard enough season already..i just cant see it i see dirty leeds have got rachukba from the lashers,id of had him back ina shot.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaskedOwl Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 20k sounds ok. Thought Leeds were after dudek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsChris Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 i think in that case then he is gonna be used as a number 2 keeper...there is no way we would sign a young keeper then allow him to sod off playing 7 or 8 games for australia under 23's in what is gonna be a hard enough season already..i just cant see it i see dirty leeds have got rachukba from the lashers,id of had him back ina shot.. I'd be amazed if we've spent £20K on a keeper to keep the bench warm. He's got to be a starter if we pay a fee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 I'd be amazed if we've spent £20K on a keeper to keep the bench warm. He's got to be a starter if we pay a fee. We paid more for Joe Colbeck.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusoe Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 £20k would not be at all bad for a promising young player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pukka Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 (edited) I'd be amazed if we've spent £20K on a keeper to keep the bench warm. He's got to be a starter if we pay a fee. My mate tells me he's a class act and didn't think they'd keep hold of him. I cant see him being anything other than a starter. Edited June 29, 2011 by pukka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnno1 Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 I njust dont buy into this Amos stuff either. Its pretty obvious that his days at Man U are limited and they will be looking to move him on pretty soon and getting back the development money they have invested in him plus profit. If he did come in on loan we would simply be adding to his experience and value for the benefit of Man U. Better for us surely to get in a good promising number one like Cisak and back him up with a development keeper of a good standard. There will be plenty of those coming out of Premier league Academies where they dont get an earthly chance of playing at the moment. Young English keepers will be at a premium as the home grown rules and financial integrity rules tighten up. Top clubs will want to use their options to comply on outfield positions if they can. We should go get ourselves a good English kid and develop him as back up initially. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcprozac Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 In the Advertiser, Taggart claims our interest in Cisak us "news to him." Could be a ruse and I expect him to now definitely sign... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 If he's an under 23 he will have a good shout at playing in the Olympics, if he does well he'll be worth more than £20k. We've paid a fee a few times for signings in the past few seasons- Furman being the prime example, he's worth more than the £50k we paid for him, for a club at our level its a decent way to make some money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losesome Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 We paid more for Joe Colbeck.... Yeh but you can't argue that class does cost !!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.