davebuckley06

gets better everytime you watch it doesnt it. what a move that was. arsenal would have been proud of that

it also says further down the article that it is a prediction from corney. hes not said dfinate. and it also says he is looking at all other available options. think its made pretty clear myself. probably emotions talking over his head but basically saying he is looking for a ground share with someone. if it costs so much to run BP nad for the upkeep of BP how long do you think they can keep funding it without any concrete plans for a move or renovation or anything positive

anywhere that safe gaurds the future of our club be that tameside oldham or anywhere else within reason. i think were now past the stage of it has to be oldham postcode or has to be in the borough it just has to be our football club surviving

that may be true but if someone saw it who doesnt no what it is aimed at they wont understand they would think we ment just the town most people ould take offence should love the club hate the council in my opinion

at least we wont have to worry about them making a push

y dont we av someone with forward thinking like that. stick that or sumat similar after the local news on granada get a few more people interested

pretty much my thoughts exactly

wasnt that going to cost 80 million? nice to be able to spend other peoples money int it? an that money is no longer there anyway

i like that idea. i would be more likely to put a bit of change in a box

neville southall, 'fat frank' lampard,

latics 3 daggers 0 taylor 4256

well ye i thought hudds was a better performance, first half against exeter. plymouth at home we were exelant all round. and the notts county game was a good performance. it was entertaining last night but again i think we have played better and i think we will play better acroos the remainder of the season. as for link ups flicks and tricks huddersfiled game wins by a country mile

last night was good but some people are going way over board. it was far from our finest performance under dickov we just had the end product. finest performance in front of goal under dickov maybe but not finest performance. the big thing that i took from last night was that even when we werent playing at our best we managed a 4-0 victory over a decent mid table team who battered us away

or accept that no one wants to watch dagenham? especially when huddersfield is the week after?

i was going to say the same thing. this signing in itself not a problem but we have signed two young players today and payed a fee for one yet we can only offer them contracts until the end of the season? we have morais who wants to stay and has had a contract offer on the table for weeks but wont sign (speculation its short term and he wants long term) it all seems to add up to if we dont go up we wont be going anywere apart from out of business. surely its in the clubs best interest to get young exciting players tied down to a longer term deal. i am far from a doom an gloomer but the whole thing worries me

really? i think he has looked ok but rather shacky. probably because he not played for so long but i wouldnt get close to sayin hes been quality. an not t the standard he was playin when he left. there is time tho

latics 2 0 brentford taylor 4002

+1

i would go as far as to say feeney was our man of the match yesterday

think the chaplow effort came from behind two players so he dint see it till late and it wasnt half moving. agree with you about the chamberlain effort he should have done better ref might have already blown but he still went for it. the only poor distribution i saw was when ruben wellied it at him or when he was dropped in it with hospital balls by black and trotters. for barnards goal it was one on one so u expect the striker to score he stayed on his feet till last minute and didnt bring him down dont think he made it easy for him. that goal was down to black satnding there like a melon with his hand in the air whilst barnard ran past him on his own. how he thought he was offside when it was clearly him playing him on i will never no. personally i think black gave up and long before the 6th goal

yep i agree, an jus seen the highlights and definatly only the 2nd his fault. the rest was poor defending infact woeful defending. poor doesnt quite cover it

think he would be first choice at chelsea bosingwa an ferara arnt gunna keep him out are they

latics 1 2 swindon furman 4367

have to agree with that especially the 6 second bit and ur quite right he could have easily thrown it but seriously he dint jus run to the edge of the box did he. once he got there he had to keep moving from side to side to get away from trotman who seemed to be chasing him. think it would have been a brave ref to book the keeper an tell him he should have thrown it instead

well if were being realistic and not jus p*ssed off at him for having an otherwise sh*t game the simple answer would be yes he was. he was chasing him around the area doing whatever he could to get in the way of him. brooke did it later on and stood at the side of him hurling abuse that is aloud and the way it should be done. in trotmans defence he dint have a clue what he was doing after being moved up top