whittles left foot

I am not suggesting anything. YOU put up they were secretive BUT then said they haven't got a plan. But if they are secretive you wouldn't know would you? As usual unable to see the nonsense in your writing Be honest. When did you last have a good word to post on here about anybody recently-nah ever?

If they are secretive as you say then how can you know there is no plan-its a secret!!!! More precious folk on here who think they have a right to know everything and are not prepared to wait and see what is announced before criticising.

You cannot become a director who attended without joining the trust. You have to start somewhere. None of you have managed to explain why you need to know now.

What is all the rush about with you lot? A few days ain't gonna make any difference now and there's nowt you lot all criticising the Trust can do about it anyway. If you really wanted to know immediately then you should have joined the trust and could have attended the meeting.

So Clarke was already here, the keeper and Lang were signed at the beginning of the season. No reason why similar players cannot be signed again under the same owner. Vera signing should be put in some context-we were desperate for a striker and the window was about to shut-he is rubbish though. So you say we pay Maouche above the rate because the agent makes more money-but the agent(or proxy) owns the club so ends up paying out more-do the math it doesn't work how you want it too. So what is he here for? Enlighten us please.

High quality reply-suggest you stick to telling us where Edmundson is going next season. Again.

Please explain where there is any logic in this? How is he any better than what we have now?

So just pandering to the receptive audience on here then.

So do you actually know the fella OR is this just your own opinion?

Well there was a meeting this week of EFL championship clubs were they threw out a resolution that club finances should be independently audited. Gibson, chairman of Middlesborough thinks at least 3 championship clubs are cooking the books over the amount of losses they can incur over 3 years. He refused to attend I believe. It doesn't look good. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48042278

Bury put up for sale by latest owner. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48058322

Another OWTB fact bites the dust? Oh Dear.

The first bit from your own quote is entirely speculation and so is easily used to support your stance, it is just your opinion. Nobody has been able to explain the Carlisle debacle. Can't disagree about the undermined season and I agree that Bunn should have been given more time. Your defence of Scholes frankly ignores the fact he won 1 match and blew most of the other games, in fact it was mentioned on here that the Scholes appointment fitted in well with an easy fixture list Lincoln apart.That run ruined our remaining season, if you cannot see this you are delusional How he can be held responsible for a bloke bailing out when the going got tough escapes me. Presume you or somebody else will cry 'interference' well that's just cobblers, we all do jobs that require compromise and football is no stranger to managers being told who they can play and who they cannot occasionally. But again it suits all those baying for his appointment at the time and of course gives Scholes an easy escape from any loss of face. Don't understand your last sentence but I am sure you do.

Got to agree with the first part of your post, just one big hole in your arguement and it begins and ends in S------s. How convenient to miss this out completely and turn it like sooo many on here into a lets bash the owner.

Did I miss some of todays game? I ask because Nepo was given MOM when you hardly knew he was there and Missilou and Lang ran themselves ragged and had a great game. Got to disagree with this. Would you have changed a team that had just won 3 on the bounce? Admittedly he does seem to want to get to 60 mins before he lets the team open up a bit more but with the players we have he does seem to be able to get a performance from them. After this seasons shenanigans I would like to see him given a chance. He did say on the radio we gave them far too much space first half. Thought the weather played an important part too-Iverson couldn't get past the half way line first half with his kicks. Pitch was fine. Fair play today Kowenicki your lad was terrible and you have called him out for it.

Nothing obvious about it at all-unless it suits your somewhat jaded protection of Mr Scholes.

And all that alleged interfering if it is still supposed to be happening has just produced 3 wins on the bounce under a different manager-I use the term manager loosely in the case of Mr Scholes.

Do you really think he is going to say "yeah I shouldn't have took the job as I had no idea what managing a team in Lge 2 was all about?"

Wow, this is a bit strange cos I played for one of the Hulme teams in 1974 against Bury and QEGS.

Based on your post from 2 hours ago you are about as good as AL at keeping your promises-this above was from 15 hours ago.

Now that is a picture of a proper Latics Manager-have a good look Shucky!!!

'We' haven't missed anything. You however?

If it is not clear to you yet that Scholes was not fit for management then it never will be.

Can't say I regard any of these clubs as giving value-the money invested in them to get them where they are does not represent a good value deal, just a shed load of money thrown at a football club. None of them are producing an income stream-quite the opposite but this is modern day football. Get a sugar daddy to invest or struggle. I thought somebody might give Burnley as an example-still in Premier Lge and announced £36 million profit for last season. Got cash in bank too.

Are you able to give an actual example of this?