Jump to content

mikejh45

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    2,651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mikejh45

  1. Sorry FB, you tried and have been found wanting. Walk away.
  2. Bluddy hell.....what a contract that lad is on.
  3. I've nowhere to go with this discussion so we'll just have to disagree, old boy. ?
  4. As has been said before, Nixon throws out enough crap on all clubs that a very tiny percentage turns out to be true. So he's hardly credible. How many stories has Nixon put out in the last couple of years about Latics that have turned out to be bollox?
  5. Should the club put out a statement every time a negative story is printed? Or should it quietly go about it's business? I'll go for the latter As for sensationalism......I find it funny that so many people virulently complain/condemn on here about the quality of the Mail's journalism but accept Keegan's stories because they go unchallenged.
  6. I didn't specifically mention Keegan but now you've brought his name up, I will say he is prone to sensationalism hence we are still waiting for this big (his words) close season story. We heard stories from a number of posters with varying sources and Keegan himself posted twice that the players hadn't been paid and someone else in between had stated the players had been paid with the Trust also saying that, according to their information wages had been paid. Based on that.....I don't have a source and am still no wiser but I'm leaning towards the players being paid as it's all gone quiet
  7. Won't really make any difference...the same news-b*stards will still be hovering next month to see if the players have been paid and they will only stop if it's not an issue for several months.
  8. I'm guessing we would have heard, very loudly and very clearly, if the players hadn't been paid. Plenty of people on here claim to have an unimpeachable source.
  9. You need to let this go, it's not healthy. it's eating away at your soul…..it's nearly 30 (THIRTY.....jeez, I feel old) years ago. As much as I feel angry with Sharp for that miss, he held up the ball and wasted time when we were frustrating Utd by putting the ball out for a throw in by United corner flag. I felt at the time, IRC, Big Joe should have brought Ritchie on to replace Beckford because he was incapable of holding the ball up. Bugger...….I'm falling into grumpy old fan mode!!!
  10. Are you sure you are a Latics Fan? Keegan says the players haven't been paid according to his source and you are quiet. The Trust says "The information we're getting back at the moment is quite the opposite" and you question the Trust's source. I can't understand why you didn't question Keegan instead of blindly accepting his version?
  11. That's not strictly true...….every time Gardner went for a through ball, Mansfield's players ran on to them perfectly.
  12. As long as he doesn't kick a ball or an infant tackles him.....that could set him back months!!!
  13. Have to agree with previous comments about how poor we were. Having said that, Mansfield's midfield were very good as a unit. I'm looking back at our team last night and sympathised with our defence.....our midfield offered nothing and were left to lump the ball up to our 2 lumps. Missile did what we all expected of him which was to tackle, Dummigan is not a right sided midfielder and is clearly not match fit. Why does Bunn keep playing Lang on the left.....he is so right footed, his left leg is there only to stop him falling sideways off the toilet. As for Gardner, that was his worst performance I have witnessed this season. I am struggling to believe that Maouche u could make that midfield worse. We should gloss over last night's forwards......no, change that....they were crap.....having said that, they had no quality ball to deal with but I need to add that anything of any substance would have been a waste. Our defence as a unit was ok, all things considered. For the Carlisle match, I would move Lang to the right and bring Nepo back to the left. If fit, put Surridge up front with Baxter. Sadlly, I'm expecting more of the same.
  14. Oh, that was you!!! She wasn't the slightest problem......I think she had more fun lifting up the seats and letting them fall down. Like I said to you.....been through it with my girls.
  15. Bluddy hell......you don't know...your comment is an opinion NOT fact. "Managed properly"...bollox. How many managers have, and are still prepared to, let him go due to his sh*t attitude. A team consists of 11 players not Byrne and 10 other blokes. I put it back to you...….Deluded if you disagree,
  16. But...but...but....we would walk this division if we still had that player from last season, doncha know!!! AND it's all the fault of that dastardly chairperson.
  17. No idea but he probably deserved it just for being an embarrassment.
  18. Our nr 1 knob head fan has just been ejected.
  19. You responded with a suggestion which is your right. However, you could have left it as per your suggestion And not responded.. I suspect you feel the need to have the feel the need to have the last word if it is a pint you disagree with!
  20. Agreed…… I remember Paul Reid giving him a proper kicking and he just got up and carried on...….proper footballer not like Desailly.
  21. I could be wrong on this bit, I think Whitehall turned Desailly in the penalty box and could have had a clear shot if Desailly hadn't embarrassingly fallen over and the ref, Paul "Pickled" Durkin, hadn't blown for a very dodgy foul. I thought at the time..."Soft French Tart"......not like our present Frenchies. Anybody else remember the ketchup soaked, half eaten sausage roll lobbed (very accurately I might add) at Durkin.....he felt his head and saw what he thought was blood and almost fainted?
×
×
  • Create New...