razza699 Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 (edited) Huddersfield haven't given us permission to use Clarke in the FA Cup , but have let us use Simpson Unless they have a buyer lined up for Clarke who dont want him cup tied ? Also City have let us use Scapuzzi , which has surprised me with them using him in the League Cup. They obviously dont have plans to use him in the FA Cup Edited November 9, 2011 by razza699 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Huddersfield haven't given us permission to use Clarke in the FA Cup , but have let us use Simpson Unless they have a buyer lined up for Clarke who dont want him cup tied ? Also City have let us use Scapuzzi , which has surprised me with them using him in the League Cup. They obviously dont have plans to use him in the FA Cup I'd have thought city would have wanted scapuzzi for the early rounds of the f.a cup! Does this hint at the possibility of the loan bein extended in jan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slystallone Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Huddersfield haven't given us permission to use Clarke in the FA Cup , but have let us use Simpson Unless they have a buyer lined up for Clarke who dont want him cup tied ? Also City have let us use Scapuzzi , which has surprised me with them using him in the League Cup. They obviously dont have plans to use him in the FA Cup I pressumed that was the reason why Clarke wasn't playing last night - to give Diamond & M'Voto a game together before the Burton on Sat. Strange if they're letting Simpson, as I assumed it would be him who they wouldn't want cup tied - as I guess they'll be looking for a fee if they can get it for him as they paid one out to buy him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Break The Silence Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Huddersfield haven't given us permission to use Clarke in the FA Cup , but have let us use Simpson Unless they have a buyer lined up for Clarke who dont want him cup tied ? Also City have let us use Scapuzzi , which has surprised me with them using him in the League Cup. They obviously dont have plans to use him in the FA Cup Just hope 'Udders don't want a fee for Simpson come January 'cos I for one would love to see him stay. Excellent yet again last night and could easily have had a hatrick with a bit of luck... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Blue Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Just hope 'Udders don't want a fee for Simpson come January 'cos I for one would love to see him stay. Excellent yet again last night and could easily have had a hatrick with a bit of luck... I'll be surprised if they let him go for free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 When does Simpson's contract run out at Hudds as they may not have a choice about letting him go on a free Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 When does Simpson's contract run out at Hudds as they may not have a choice about letting him go on a free On 18 June 2009, after intensive speculation, Simpson joined Football League One side Huddersfield Town for a fee believed to be around £300,000 on a three-year deal According to that its up in June , so that's why I imagine they want to sell him in January Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 On 18 June 2009, after intensive speculation, Simpson joined Football League One side Huddersfield Town for a fee believed to be around £300,000 on a three-year deal According to that its up in June , so that's why I imagine they want to sell him in January June 2009 + 3 years = 2012. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 June 2009 + 3 years = 2012. Yes ? So January is the last chance they get to sell him ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshOWTB Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 June 2009 + 3 years = 2012. Next year! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 Next year! I get the feeling Diegos losing track of time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 I get the feeling Diegos losing track of time I remember when it was all fields around here and you could leave your door open.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 January will be too late won't it? As January is 6 months from the time his contract runs out, so he will be free to speak to other teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 January will be too late won't it? As January is 6 months from the time his contract runs out, so he will be free to speak to other teams. Very true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 Diegos gone quiet, sometimes you can overcorrect someone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Diegos gone quiet, sometimes you can overcorrect someone He's taking time out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Yes ? So January is the last chance they get to sell him ? Blimey, is it nearly 2012 already? You lose all sense of time when retired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 January will be too late won't it? As January is 6 months from the time his contract runs out, so he will be free to speak to other teams. Nope, i think that its to late if the player is to cross a country border, but within the country, clubs have to wait until summer.. May be wrong however though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Nope, i think that its to late if the player is to cross a country border, but within the country, clubs have to wait until summer.. May be wrong however though. Nope. Can sign a pre-contract at any time in the last six months of contract. Borders have no bearing on that, unless it's a youngster; in which case, they still have the same right but compensation may be due. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Nope. Can sign a pre-contract at any time in the last six months of contract. Borders have no bearing on that, unless it's a youngster; in which case, they still have the same right but compensation may be due. Just like Dean Furman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaskedOwl Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 sign them all! simpson, clarke, scapuzzi! Razza, you seem to have changed your tune on Simpson ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted November 10, 2011 Author Share Posted November 10, 2011 sign them all! simpson, clarke, scapuzzi! Razza, you seem to have changed your tune on Simpson ;) Simpsons top , always has been Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.