Tommy_Fent Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetramfixer Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Didn't most teams used to paint people on the hoardings when they had to build all seaters after the Hillsborough inquest and it's implications? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Has anyone suggested building a stand there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Did think about a piece if art via the college...but of people on the terraces with spot a famous latics face/ from the town but hey ho did not work out Agree with jss new stand please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Has anyone suggested building a stand there? Bit radical that init? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyGortonsMatches Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Something like the Arsenal mural from 92/93? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 (edited) Something like the Arsenal mural from 92/93? The mural depicted thousands of supporters, but it was criticised for not including enough black people (Arsenal had more black fans than any other English club). The painting was duly amended to reflect this. It was then pointed out that some children were depicted next to adults who did not appear to be their parents. This prompted criticism from children’s charities (who thought it irresponsible to put children next to strangers) and adoption organisations (who objected that these children would not have been placed with foster parents of different races). All children were consequently painted the same colour as the nearest adult. It was then pointed out that none of the children were sitting next to women, and that women were under-represented overall. One thousand women were added, included several hundred in saris, burkas, and traditional African headgear. Four nuns were placed in the top left-hand corner, one of whom was struck in the face by a clearance from Lee Dixon in the first match. Fifty male Sikhs were also added, some with ceremonial swords, which were then removed on police advice. It was subsequently rumoured that the picture was altered again, after gay rights groups claimed that not enough homosexuals were included. Although no such thing had happened, there were nevertheless complaints that homosexuals had been put next to women and children. The club, in conjunction with gay organisations, released a statement saying that no such alterations had occurred, that gays look no different to anyone else, don’t need to be depicted in any special way, and are no threat to women or children at football matches or anywhere else. The mural was demolished the following year. Edited March 28, 2013 by opinions4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mikey Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Could we not just rebuild Adrian Chiles' box on stilts until the stand is built, it's worked miracles before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scapegoat Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 The mural depicted thousands of supporters, but it was criticised for not including enough black people (Arsenal had more black fans than any other English club). The painting was duly amended to reflect this. It was then pointed out that some children were depicted next to adults who did not appear to be their parents. This prompted criticism from children's charities (who thought it irresponsible to put children next to strangers) and adoption organisations (who objected that these children would not have been placed with foster parents of different races). All children were consequently painted the same colour as the nearest adult. It was then pointed out that none of the children were sitting next to women, and that women were under-represented overall. One thousand women were added, included several hundred in saris, burkas, and traditional African headgear. Four nuns were placed in the top left-hand corner, one of whom was struck in the face by a clearance from Lee Dixon in the first match. Fifty male Sikhs were also added, some with ceremonial swords, which were then removed on police advice. It was subsequently rumoured that the picture was altered again, after gay rights groups claimed that not enough homosexuals were included. Although no such thing had happened, there were nevertheless complaints that homosexuals had been put next to women and children. The club, in conjunction with gay organisations, released a statement saying that no such alterations had occurred, that gays look no different to anyone else, don't need to be depicted in any special way, and are no threat to women or children at football matches or anywhere else. The mural was demolished the following year. Is that all true? I remember the story about there being no black people (as I recall it) when it was first painted and therefore subsequently changed - but not the other stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueJazzer Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 3 sided shed with a roof and 2 big lazy boy type chairs. Competition on the official site to win the chance to sit there. Comes with free food and drink and waitress service. Oh and a free programme. Could even throw in a half time wank from Jenny or a finger blasting off Billy Q if your female. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Villains Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 NSFW, seriously. Pine Villains are fully behind the half time refreshment or the Jenny's Jizzers campaign as we like have called it. As long as no bottled-tan residue, hate to have any supporters to 'come 'away with a nob like a carrot. It might incur some sort of compensation, like a trip up the wrong 'un. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Could we not just rebuild Adrian Chiles' box on stilts until the stand is built, it's worked miracles before. And then put Adrian Chiles back in, then brick it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mikey Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 And then put Adrian Chiles back in, then brick it. I like him, he's a genuine passionate fan. Missed an interview for the Watchdog presenter to go and watch the Baggies play at Tranmere. His book following a season watching West Brom, accompanying different fans at each game, is a great read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 3 sided shed with a roof and 2 big lazy boy type chairs. Competition on the official site to win the chance to sit there. Comes with free food and drink and waitress service. Oh and a free programme. Could even throw in a half time wank from Jenny or a finger blasting off Billy Q if your female. Homophobe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.