jburbri Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Apparently Stephens has joined Brighton. I just wonder if that 10 percent clause is likely to be triggered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhiggins10 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Hope so, as the fee is reported to be 4 million Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c.hill12 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 No way will it be 4 million. He's out of contract in the summer. £400k more like it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 400k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburbri Posted January 30, 2014 Author Share Posted January 30, 2014 If its 400 k we get 40 k of it not bad that. Also if tarky goes maybe use some of that cash for a striker we need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 If its 400 k we get 40 k of it not bad that. Also if tarky goes maybe use some of that cash for a striker we need. No we won't we get £10k, it's 10% of the profit after they paid £300k for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pukka Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 £10k we didn't have yesterday. Better than nothing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavageTheBeast Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 No we won't we get £10k, it's 10% of the profit after they paid £300k for him. Isn't it off any fee like most sell on clauses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c.hill12 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 No, it was a % of any profit made Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross2509 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Money is money, little bit of good news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Undisclosed according to Sky Sports Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Would tie in with the 10k upfront we offered for Jamie MacDonald Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Undisclosed according to Sky Sports Funny how its undisclosed when a sell on clause is involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Funny how its undisclosed when a sell on clause is involved. It still comes out of the buying club's accounts, who will declare it there, and therefore can be checked. The taxman is our friend in this situation as he'd be all over any dodgy amounts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsleftfoot Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Funny how its undisclosed when a sell on clause is involved. Undisclosed means to general public not OAFC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Undisclosed means to general public not OAFC. Why are some transfer fees undisclosed Jim, and others aren't - any particular reason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I can't see it mattering. He wasn't and hasn't been convicted of anything, West Ham could have been in more trouble for telling us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super_blue Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Why are some transfer fees undisclosed Jim, and others aren't - any particular reason? Clubs decision attached to sales and purchase! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveoafc Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I can't see it mattering. He wasn't and hasn't been convicted of anything, West Ham could have been in more trouble for telling us. Wrong thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midsblue Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Apparently Charlton traded him for Craig Mackail-Smith so we get to play CMS every 4th Saturday I understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddogs Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Don't bury get a percentage of any Stephens sell on monies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OAFC_Ryan Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Don't bury get a percentage of any Stephens sell on monies? They supposedly got theirs when he went to Charlton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsleftfoot Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Why are some transfer fees undisclosed Jim, and others aren't - any particular reason? I think the main reason is PR e.g. If Charlton have accepted a smaller fee than what Villa offered previously, they could be criticised in the media/by their own fans (and by us). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Wrong thread?Yeah, too tired to care! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Wardle Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 According to a Brighton fan on their message board he's heard a figure of 500k with an extra 200k after apps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.