Jump to content

LaticsChris

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    1,436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LaticsChris

  1. Exactly. I'm a little grumpy about it but that's just because I thought we had a decent manager in Johnson. He's moved to progress his career - he believes at least - in management. He's done nothing wrong. This is football and, indeed, life.
  2. If he takes Winchester with him I'll spend a week in my room weeping and listening to records.
  3. Ironically I had an excellent chicken balti pie at Oakwell.
  4. I'll take one seige mentality please, with a side of fire in belly.
  5. Pointing to the sky is hardly an ostentatious gesture, and at the time it gave us a way back into the match so was worth celebrating. Making a little heart shape with your hands; now there's a bookable offence if I ever saw one.
  6. I'd sprint along the Main Stand touchline twirling my Dukla Prague away shirt over my head, revealing a tee-shirt with "BLOODY HELL EARDLEY" across the front.
  7. You are aware we play towards the Chaddy in the second half 99% of the time aren't you..? It's not a happy coincidence.
  8. Oh, well if we're going to say burgundy isn't red I don't want to be involved any more.
  9. We had a red away kit in 2000-2001 and 2001-2002.
  10. I believe the backpass was outlawed in order to stop boring time-wasting tactics. A team winning 1-0 could just send the ball to the keeper and he could pick it up and wander around bouncing it for a bit. This came after the wonderfully boring 1990 world cup. I'm happy to be corrected by someone who wasn't still in nappies at the time though.
  11. I love the 'Ajax style' blue and white kit and I'd pair it with the, ahem, electric orange change strip. However I am but one man, and it seems there are many that for some reason many don't agree. Now it's not for me to call these people philistines, their opinions count just as much as those that do like these kits. They're wrong though.
  12. You make a good point. There's no reason they couldn't just structure deals to depend on appearances I suppose.
  13. I suppose it's possible. Unlikely enough not to be a problem though.
  14. Why would they not be? Maybe I'm missing some potentially underhand aspects of these deals but they seem fair to me.
  15. I probably should have said decent pundits for us. With Royle on board we'd get a bit more coverage than otherwise.
  16. Nevin, Taylor and Royle would be decent pundits for the show.
×
×
  • Create New...