Jump to content

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day


Recommended Posts

We are now at the point where a religious person has faith in something that they cannot prove exists.

 

I wager we're both very similar - maybe even both Skeptics (with a K) and Atheists , however I just believe in one less deity than you.

 

Oh I believe in god... A few things in my life have strengthened that view point... Religion I am a little more relaxed over... I wouldn't be surprised at all to find we are all trying to please the same entity...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 393
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You havent attempted to answer the key question once. Obviously because you are afraid of what the answer might be. I have restated it several times now. There's no way you havent understood it.

 

I did answer it... You just don't like the answers... I showed how science does that very thing... In some instances I believe things that can not yet be proven... Believing in god tells you that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I believe in god... A few things in my life have strengthened that view point... Religion I am a little more relaxed over... I wouldn't be surprised at all to find we are all trying to please the same entity...

 

:)

 

It's been a good debate, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you wasn't talking about the foundations or do you have little understanding of history ?

 

You might want to look at the history of Christianity... For arguments sake lets take the start of Christianity at 0 AD... When was the crusades ?

 

EDIT: had to look it up to double check... 1095 to 1291...

 

Foundations ?

Indeed. A weak example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also no proof that there isn't one either.

 

 

There doesn't have to be. Very few people run around claiming there isn't one. And the ones that are, are being very silly.

 

All any atheist has to do to win an argument is show that there is no good reason to believe in a god. Because that is all the atheist position is.

 

There isn't any proof either that fairies don't exist, nor leprecauns, nor UFOs, nor the loch ness monster. Doesn't mean we are justified in believing in them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did answer it... You just don't like the answers... I showed how science does that very thing... In some instances I believe things that can not yet be proven... Believing in god tells you that...

 

Well you didn't show science doing that at all.

 

But regardless

 

How do you decide what you believe exists before the evidence arrives, and what you don't believe exists?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There doesn't have to be. Very few people run around claiming there isn't one. And the ones that are, are being very silly.

 

All any atheist has to do to win an argument is show that there is no good reason to believe in a god. Because that is all the atheist position is.

 

There isn't any proof either that fairies don't exist, nor leprecauns, nor UFOs, nor the loch ness monster. Doesn't mean we are justified in believing in them.

Look, we've managed to get him to say that he can't prove the existence of God - there isn't one, and anybody with anything about them would agree. He still has the belief and I respect that. So for me the debate has come to a close.

 

You cannot drag someone away from belief. You have to respect their position, call a close to the proceedings, shake hands and go about your day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There doesn't have to be. Very few people run around claiming there isn't one. And the ones that are, are being very silly.

 

All any atheist has to do to win an argument is show that there is no good reason to believe in a god. Because that is all the atheist position is.

 

There isn't any proof either that fairies don't exist, nor leprecauns, nor UFOs, nor the loch ness monster. Doesn't mean we are justified in believing in them.

 

What justification is needed to believe in something? If someone wants to believe in something then thats their decision, they do not need anyone elses approval to do so.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, we've managed to get him to say that he can't prove the existence of God - there isn't one, and anybody with anything about them would agree. He still has the belief and I respect that. So for me the debate has come to a close.

 

You cannot drag someone away from belief. You have to respect their position, call a close to the proceedings, shake hands and go about your day.

...and can I add it has been very interesting. Thanks to all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, we've managed to get him to say that he can't prove the existence of God - there isn't one, and anybody with anything about them would agree. He still has the belief and I respect that. So for me the debate has come to a close.

 

You cannot drag someone away from belief. You have to respect their position, call a close to the proceedings, shake hands and go about your day.

 

I'm not trying to drag him away from his belief, nor do I expect to. These things take time anyway (even if that was my goal)

 

I'm merely fascinated by the thought processes that go on in the mind of the believer. With that I will always be driven to ask questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to drag him away from his belief, nor do I expect to. These things take time anyway (even if that was my goal)

 

I'm merely fascinated by the thought processes that go on in the mind of the believer. With that I will always be driven to ask questions.

Okay, however don't be too upset when the results don't match expectations! :grin:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I have a belief in a creator. If someone wishes to call this entity 'God' then so be it. But at some point there had to be a creation, as opposed to nothing. Science says the big bang theory. But what created the universe in its original condition?People can debate what caused this and I hesitate to call it a God due to the religious connotations that go with it, but removing religion, and thinking in the finest condition of the word, then maybe that is the case.

 

As for religion, it is just the implications of power hungry men to try and gain at the expense of the weak. If it has moved on from that to a moral compass or social scene, then fair enough - each to their own. But I have little doubt over its beginnings in my mind.

 

No idea whatthehellist this makes me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I have a belief in a creator. If someone wishes to call this entity 'God' then so be it. But at some point there had to be a creation, as opposed to nothing. Science says the big bang theory. But what created the universe in its original condition?People can debate what caused this and I hesitate to call it a God due to the religious connotations that go with it, but removing religion, and thinking in the finest condition of the word, then maybe that is the case.

 

As for religion, it is just the implications of power hungry men to try and gain at the expense of the weak. If it has moved on from that to a moral compass or social scene, then fair enough - each to their own. But I have little doubt over its beginnings in my mind.

 

No idea whatthehellist this makes me.

You pose the easiest to debunk theory there is.

 

You say you can't accept the big bang as something had to be there before?

 

Your solution is a sentient being - a creator.

 

What created the creator?

 

My work here is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...