Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

442 always talks bollocks. Could understand it if we were talking about the old one. Kilmarnock and Liverpool deserve to be on there. Proper traditional. 

 

Have they made their annual prediction we are going down yet?

Edited by philliggi
Posted
23 minutes ago, philliggi said:

442 always talks bollocks. Could understand it if we were talking about the old one. Kilmarnock and Liverpool deserve to be on there. Proper traditional. 

 

Have they made their annual prediction we are going down yet?

 

Agreed. They've done a worst badge article too and it'd have looked more in place there.

Posted
33 minutes ago, philliggi said:

442 always talks bollocks. Could understand it if we were talking about the old one. Kilmarnock and Liverpool deserve to be on there. Proper traditional. 

 

Have they made their annual prediction we are going down yet?

 

9 minutes ago, longtimeblue said:

 

Agreed. They've done a worst badge article too and it'd have looked more in place there.

Whereas I prefer a more traditional badge, I have no problem with a modern approach to badge design. Fulham, Juventus are two striking examples. Ours ain't too bad.

Posted
15 minutes ago, jimsleftfoot said:

As much I prefer the old badge, the new badge is better than most. Badges tend to be boring and if anything it's quirky.

 

I think it'd have been a great badge if we'd have had an Oldham Ice Hockey team in the 90's.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Magic Mikey said:

I really like our badge

I preferred the old badge..

Posted
4 hours ago, jimsleftfoot said:

As much I prefer the old badge, the new badge is better than most. Badges tend to be boring and if anything it's quirky.

 

Really? I'd say the standard shield template with animal is painfully generic in new designs, or at least that's the impression I get. Everton resisted a similar design to us fairly recently.

 

Our badge is not very objectionable because there's really not much to it.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NewBlue said:

 

Really? I'd say the standard shield template with animal is painfully generic in new designs, or at least that's the impression I get. Everton resisted a similar design to us fairly recently.

 

Our badge is not very objectionable because there's really not much to it.


Can't disagree as per basic template, but the owl on our badge (old and new) has always had personality, rather than say just being an owl symbol.

 

The new badge in particular, whether it is likeable is one thing but it does stand out. As 4-4-2 mentions, its definitely giving evils!!

 

 

 

 

Edited by jimsleftfoot
Posted
11 hours ago, Hometownclub said:

Me too, much preferred it, the owl looks really annoyed on the new one.

Not surprising given our overall form since he appeared on the badge!

Posted

I remember having a metal lapel badge of that in the 70s. It was as big as my head and weighed a ton. Just as well as the lapels on the safari suit that my mum made me took eyes out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...