Jump to content

Robinson on Radio Manchester Tonight


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am running at 100% then.

 

The other points that you made were speculating that income might start to cover the running costs at some time in the future.

 

When (or if) that happens I will cease *whiteelephant

So the OEC is losing money as a business currently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ah so we're back to the notion that the vast majority of the revenue from the OEC is neither going to the football club, nor the repayment of debt incurred in building it but being stripped out to line the pockets of TTA?

 

Did the protest group accountants get to the bottom of this allegation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly are the running costs?

So far as I can see, Fitting out costs, Repairs, Staffing costs (All) on Matchdays, Rates and most probably loan repayments including the Scousers.

Once the scousers are repaid I will be a lot happier that the other costs are being met. Third party debt is not unimportant.

I would ask you to assume that a lot of fans in the North Stand are not paying anything (or very little) towards the current running costs as ST holders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah so we're back to the notion that the vast majority of the revenue from the OEC is neither going to the football club, nor the repayment of debt incurred in building it but being stripped out to line the pockets of TTA?

 

Did the protest group accountants get to the bottom of this allegation?

OEC Ltd can in truth do as they want to do.

I make no accusations about any surplus going anywhere but await signs that it is going into OAFC Ltd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OEC Ltd can in truth do as they want to do.

I make no accusations about any surplus going anywhere but await signs that it is going into OAFC Ltd

That accusation was definitely made by someone else. As long as it's going into OAFC and/or reducing the debt incurred for building the stand (however that may be split) then can't see the problem. Obviously I'd prefer to see the playing budget increase but having the stand is better than not having it, or than having the old Lookers if we're going to appeal to any sort of new owner.

 

But by calling it a white elephant, aren't you saying that the debt is actually going up if it can't cover running costs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But by calling it a white elephant, aren't you saying that the debt is actually going up if it can't cover running costs?

Yes I am. We can only see financial info as outsiders as most is not released openly or only when the OAFC 2004 Ltd Accounts are published.

That is usually 9 months late or in the case of this year 12 months late. Should we have all that info quickly and in detail-perhaps not!

So we have to go off what else we find out usually through the back door or what is so apparent that it cannot be denied.

It was I who discovered the Scouse loan and third part borrowing is a worrying sign. It is still outstanding.

We found out last season that wages were being paid late-again an obvious sign of cashflow problems. Might it happen again-I dont know.

Labourers on the stand were paid late, new contractors were being found and the Company building it went into Liquidation.

The main case behind the North Stand being constructed as a 24/7 income generator was quite obviously the larger function room suitable for larger gatherings/ decently sized seminars and weddings etc. If there was any income of any substance being generated it would (I imagine) go to completing the fitting out.

There are all these signs that things have not been going well. Now list me the signs of the opposite!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I am. We can only see financial info as outsiders as most is not released openly or only when the OAFC 2004 Ltd Accounts are published.

That is usually 9 months late or in the case of this year 12 months late. Should we have all that info quickly and in detail-perhaps not!

So we have to go off what else we find out usually through the back door or what is so apparent that it cannot be denied.

It was I who discovered the Scouse loan and third part borrowing is a worrying sign. It is still outstanding.

We found out last season that wages were being paid late-again an obvious sign of cashflow problems. Might it happen again-I dont know.

Labourers on the stand were paid late, new contractors were being found and the Company building it went into Liquidation.

The main case behind the North Stand being constructed as a 24/7 income generator was quite obviously the larger function room suitable for larger gatherings/ decently sized seminars and weddings etc. If there was any income of any substance being generated it would (I imagine) go to completing the fitting out.

There are all these signs that things have not been going well. Now list me the signs of the opposite!

When did I say things had been going well? All the stuff you listed as reasons why it is losing money happened before it was even open so of course the debt was increasing then.

 

It cost more than originally expected and things got very tight to deliver it in the state it is now. It's now generating revenue, some of which no doubt will go on completing it, and some will go on debt. But for me it still stands as a positive and with it we stand a better chance of attracting outside interest (closing any deal being a different matter).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When did I say things had been going well? All the stuff you listed as reasons why it is losing money happened before it was even open so of course the debt was increasing then.

 

It cost more than originally expected and things got very tight to deliver it in the state it is now. It's now generating revenue, some of which no doubt will go on completing it, and some will go on debt. But for me it still stands as a positive and with it we stand a better chance of attracting outside interest (closing any deal being a different matter).

So you cannot list any positives then? At least you agree that things are not going well.

A lot of the financial problems occured once construction had started but at least you agree income (if being made) is being spent on completing it.

That is not profit though. It will be years and years before any return is seen by OAFC 2004 Ltd, It just looks nice, very nice from the outside

All the while OAFC 2004 Ltd has higher debt and extra running costs whilst the football team attracts fewer and fewer paying customers.

Those (reduced in number year by year) paying customers could all fit in one stand-the RRE. Its a failed business plan that is not even complete.

And all the time the price to buy OAFC 2004 Ltd goes up and up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nonaenever

I do see the new stand as an asset. My daughter booked a few of us in for the Father's Day meal - all in, with the tickets and drinks on the day, we spent about £300. So that's a "season ticket income" in 2 hours! Clearly good business (and I'm talking about cash-flow not profit - anyone in business will know "cash-flow is king").

 

Now I don't pretend to know where the money is going but a brand spanking new stand has to be an asset rather than a much-loved but decrepit facility.

 

The sad thing is to see it so empty. As someone else has said, take away season ticket holders and the actual income on match days is relatively paltry. Even more reason to market events etc.

 

In the final analysis, we needed a good start to the season. Had we won (and played decent) in our last 2 home games, we would be heading for 4,000 home supporters. As it is, we are heading for 3,000. That's the harsh reality - the only real answer is success on the pitch, or at least a modicum of success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you cannot list any positives then? At least you agree that things are not going well.

A lot of the financial problems occured once construction had started but at least you agree income (if being made) is being spent on completing it.

That is not profit though. It will be years and years before any return is seen by OAFC 2004 Ltd, It just looks nice, very nice from the outside

All the while OAFC 2004 Ltd has higher debt and extra running costs whilst the football team attracts fewer and fewer paying customers.

Those (reduced in number year by year) paying customers could all fit in one stand-the RRE. Its a failed business plan that is not even complete.

And all the time the price to buy OAFC 2004 Ltd goes up and up

Thanks for twisting what I said to suit your own argument.

 

And I do agree that the value is going up and up. We were all outraged when it was supposedly £10 million a month ago, now it's gone up to £20 million apparently. That's one expensive elephant to keep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for twisting what I said to suit your own argument.

 

And I do agree that the value is going up and up. We were all outraged when it was supposedly £10 million a month ago, now it's gone up to £20 million apparently. That's one expensive elephant to keep.

Twisting is a very strange term to use. Are we to ignore the construction costs in any discussion? I think that you are getting a bit desperate now

BTW price sought and value are 2 completely different things. The value was never going to be in excess of £10M and still isnt. But SC cannot see that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twisting is a very strange term to use. Are we to ignore the construction costs in any discussion? I think that you are getting a bit desperate now

BTW price sought and value are 2 completely different things. The value was never going to be in excess of £10M and still isnt. But SC cannot see that

What asking price is being sought?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...