the_mighty_bosh Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Oxley Brown Wilson Lockwood Grounds Worrall Smith Wes Harkins Philliskirk Stead While it's still early days for the development of that back 5 despite last week's clean sheet, that front 6 looks as good as we've had all season.
youngen Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 I still think Tarkowski will walk straight back in, even though he has been well out of form and the others did well last weekend.
HarryBosch Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Oxley Brown Lockwood Tarkowski Grounds Worrall Smith Wesolowski Harkins Clarke Harris Philliskirk
lookersstandandy Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Oxley Brown Lockwood Tarkowski Grounds Worrall Smith Wesolowski Harkins Clarke Harris Philliskirk Stead is gonna play.... we wouldn't have signed him for a month to sit on the bench.....!
oafc1955 Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Lockwood and Wilson must start in my opinion.....it would be a real kick in the teeth to be dropped for Tarky. Tarky will be excellent cover at CB but he's not our player now and we have to look to the future. It's early days but by all accounts the back 4 were as solid as at any time this season....leave well alone. The only other changes for me would be to play Stead up front from the start alongside Philliskirk.
simplythemostimportantkick Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Same team as Swindon please with stead coming on at some point in second half
slystallone Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 I'd say Tarky should probably come into the side, on ability & on his overall form over the season so far. But - it would be extremely harsh on either Wilson or Lockwood if he did do; given how well they did at Swindon. Hard decision really; who'd be a manager eh? Oh - Stead to start for me, alongside Philly; with JCH to come off the bench to ruffle feathers and use his raw pace & directness (whilst trying to stay on his feet) against tired defenders.
mikejh45 Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 I'd say Tarky should probably come into the side, on ability & on his overall form over the season so far. 1st Quarter of the season...yes. 2nd Quarter....no. But we need stability, confidence and the opportunity to build partnerships for now and the future so on balance...leave well alone and start the same defence.
PlayItLivo Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 (edited) Wilson is on loan from Bristol City isn't he? so won't be eligible to play? Edited February 5, 2014 by PlayItLivo
ceskylatic Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Wilson is our own player.Contract to end of this season with an option to extend.
disjointed Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Surprising thing about this thread is nobody wanting Brown to be dropped. Just saying.
Latics_Fanatic Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 (edited) Oxley Grounds Wilson Lockwood Brown Harkins Wesolowski Smith Worrall Philliskirk Stead ... Just read the OP, same team! Edited February 5, 2014 by Latics_Fanatic
PlayItLivo Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 (edited) Wilson is our own player.Contract to end of this season with an option to extend.Ah, fair enough. In that case I wouldn't mess around with a defence who have just kept a clean sheet. Let them build some confidence. Edited February 5, 2014 by PlayItLivo
stevesmitt Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 Lockwood and Wilson must start in my opinion.....it would be a real kick in the teeth to be dropped for Tarky. Tarky will be excellent cover at CB but he's not our player now and we have to look to the future. It's early days but by all accounts the back 4 were as solid as at any time this season....leave well alone. The only other changes for me would be to play Stead up front from the start alongside Philliskirk. I agree that we need to look to the future but while we have Tarky available we should use him, at least till we are safe. Dont understand how you can say Tarky shouldnt play for that reason but Stead should play instead of Clark Harris.
disjointed Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 I agree that we need to look to the future but while we have Tarky available we should use him, at least till we are safe. Dont understand how you can say Tarky shouldnt play for that reason but Stead should play instead of Clark Harris. You make a totally valid point there, but clean sheets for us recently have been rarer than rocking horse :censored:. Why change the defence, job well done last Saturday.
mikejh45 Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) I agree that we need to look to the future but while we have Tarky available we should use him, at least till we are safe. Dont understand how you can say Tarky shouldnt play for that reason but Stead should play instead of Clark Harris. Who would you drop and why? Also, we needed a clean sheet and got one. We need a bigger, more actively physical presence up front hence Stead to start. There's an opinion to your second question. Edited February 6, 2014 by mikejh45
yarddog73 Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 tarky in for brown at right back stread in for jch upfront.
deyres42 Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 tarky in for brown at right back stread in for jch upfront. Wouldn't be surprised if we did that, some big fellas in the Bristol team.
LaticsChris Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 Tarkowski's loan has yet to be confirmed hasn't it? I've seen nothing on the OS today. Either way I'd stick with Wilson and Lockwood, sounds like they played well last week so no need to change.
smartzatart Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 The window opens tomorrow, I thought players had to be signed by lunchtime on Friday in order to play on a Saturday? How come some feel Tarky's not a viable option because he's no longer our player, we've got loan players coming out of our ears, at least we know his ability and attitude aren't in question!
yarddog73 Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 team in chron is the same one that finished the game last week tarky is named among the subs
Ritchierich Posted February 7, 2014 Posted February 7, 2014 (edited) The window opens tomorrow, I thought players had to be signed by lunchtime on Friday in order to play on a Saturday? How come some feel Tarky's not a viable option because he's no longer our player, we've got loan players coming out of our ears, at least we know his ability and attitude aren't in question! Because he chose to leave us so that's it, gone, forget him, move on Edited February 7, 2014 by Ritchierich
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now