LeylandLatic Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 If he's not performing in training (which I assume he isn't...) then he doesn't deserve a place on the pitch or bench. That's the crux of it. He has the ability to be a very good player for us, but you see more application in Sunday league than Carl shows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanGrovesFanClub Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Oh dear ! Don't my posts after Northampton and Bury games count then..... Nope, your posts count for nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlue Posted August 24, 2016 Author Share Posted August 24, 2016 I think last night says it all. He's had a lot of chances. Cassidy is in a very difficult situation. Looked good initially at the very start of last season but had a bad injury that effectively torpedoed the whole campaign for him. This time round you would hope he can get himself fit and in contention to play the target man role when required. I thought he looked OK in the first half albeit with very little service or support except for Erwin who was good yet again. Second half looked absolutely shattered after 10 mins and should have come off. I feel it's a bit unfair to judge and condemn him in a match against championship opposition with no real support coming from the midfield until he was already spent. The big problem for me is the fitness and he needs to sort that out. Footballer's are paid a lot of money even at or level for a pretty easy life, being unfit is unforgivable. I'd send him out on loan to league two if possible, get him match fit and have him back in Jan. This is a new manager with an entirely new squad. All of these players are playing from scratch, surely? As for Cassidy, you can see when there's a footballer there or not. There's not a footballer there. Did he do okay first half by his standards or by what we would expect of any professional? I thought he was so poor all game, like he has been every match since his two game hot-streak. This isn't about making him a boo-boy, it's just that he simply isn't good enough. Playing him is a waste of Osei, Glackin and everybody else's time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Nope, your posts count for nothing. Well at least nothing squared = 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Well at least nothing squared = 1Not sure if you're serious there or its a maths based pun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flemboy Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 This is a new manager with an entirely new squad. All of these players are playing from scratch, surely? As for Cassidy, you can see when there's a footballer there or not. There's not a footballer there. Did he do okay first half by his standards or by what we would expect of any professional? I thought he was so poor all game, like he has been every match since his two game hot-streak. This isn't about making him a boo-boy, it's just that he simply isn't good enough. Playing him is a waste of Osei, Glackin and everybody else's time. Exactly.To think he was given a two year contract with an option for a third.Ive forgot which manager signed him.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Kelly/Corney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Wa Exactly.To think he was given a two year contract with an option for a third.Ive forgot which manager signed him.. Wasn't it Kelly?...injured first match and missed most of last season? But I could be wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Played at Wallsall and set up Forte's goal got injured in the 1st home game. Kelly was manager when he was signed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flemboy Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Thanks.....and what a success he was/is at Halifax and Hyde Utd!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Played at Wallsall and set up Forte's goal got injured in the 1st home game. Kelly was manager when he was signed. He was awesome for a game and a half. But didn't score Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanGrovesFanClub Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Well at least nothing squared = 1 and if anyone's square it's certainty you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laticsmarra Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 I don't like calling players individually and have given Cassidy the benefit of the doubt based on his injury last season,but that performance last night was a shocker particularly considering he must have known it was his last chance. It made it worse for him with Erwin buzzing around him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Not sure if you're serious there or its a maths based pun? No made a complete mess of it...was going to make a point out of how any number to the power of 0 ( nothing) always gives the answer 1.... Made a complete horlicks of it though.....I think I got away with I! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanGrovesFanClub Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 (edited) No made a complete mess of it...was going to make a point out of how any number to the power of 0 ( nothing) always gives the answer 1.... Made a complete horlicks of it though.....I think I got away with I!I can't copy the link on my crap HTC phone, but many mathematicians say zero squared = 1. I thought you were correct! Although I couldn't see how it relates to my post :-) Edited August 24, 2016 by AlanGrovesFanClub Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mikey Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 I can't copy the link on my crap HTC phone, but many mathematicians say zero squared = 1. I thought you were correct! Although I couldn't see how it relates to my post :-) Why not just use the calculator on your phone to see 0 x 0 = 0? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanGrovesFanClub Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 Why not just use the calculator on your phone to see 0 x 0 = 0? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 I'll travel to meet anyone interested in swapping £1 in return for me giving them no pounds on no occasions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythemostimportantkick Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 I'll travel to meet anyone interested in swapping £1 in return for me giving them no pounds on no occasionsBut who pays the travelling expenses ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcfluff1985 Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 Surprised when Magister tried working out his maths problem that the number he came up with wasn't a negative one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 But who pays the travelling expenses ?They'll cost half of :censored: all anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mikey Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 I'll travel to meet anyone interested in swapping £1 in return for me giving them no pounds on no occasions If you don't turn up do they owe you £2? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythemostimportantkick Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 They'll cost half of :censored: all anywayHalf of :censored: all squared x 0 = 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 My phones being a funny :censored:er, typed in 0 x 0 pressed equal and the answer was Undisclosed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 Surprised when Magister tried working out his maths problem that the number he came up with wasn't a negative one[/quote But a negative multiplied by a negative always gives a positive McFluff!, whereas a negative multiplied by a positive gives a negative. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.