Clifford Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Here are some dictionary definitions for you to swot-up on. Paedophilia is used for individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children aged 13 or younger. Hebephilia is the strong and persistent adult sexual interest in pubescent (early adolescent) individuals, typically ages 1114 Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19. Once again, media-fuelled misconceptions make people spout verbal diarrhoea. I do not condone the stupid misuse of his position of power and influence over the girl but he should not be tarred as a "Paedophile" by people like you who probably put more faith in what the 'Sun' and the' Daily Mail' tell you, rather than the facts. He hasn't been charged with anything, yet. Can I ask why you've needed an in depth knowledge of these categories? If you're going to try and sound clever make sure your correct on all aspects of your post, Jimmy. Any adult having sex or sexual contact with a child is a paedophile is most peoples eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Any adult having sex or sexual contact with a child is a paedophile is most peoples eyes. Just to be pedantic, you should have said 'most British peoples eyes' as Johnson wouldnt actually have committed a crime almost anywhere else in Europe. The :censored:in paedo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Can I ask why you've needed an in depth knowledge of these categories? If you're going to try and sound clever make sure your correct on all aspects of your post, Jimmy. Any adult having sex or sexual contact with a child is a paedophile is most peoples eyes. Are you actually making insinuations against someone because of them posting their under of the relevant legal facts? Remarkable behaviour coming from a rape apologist. In this instance I have problem with stating that have sex with a 7 year old is a much graver offence than doing it with a 15 year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Well what I am really trying to understand is the definition of "disgusting". By the definition of the law that was posted earlier it seems that there is a distinction between 13, where girls are presumably considered to be physically immature, and 14-15 where I would guess the distinction is that they are emotionally too immature. Given that in the past girls were routinely married off as soon as they reached sexual maturity, and there is evidence that men are wired to chase younger women as being capable of carrying their children and hence perpetuating the man's genetic legacy... does that mean that Adam Johnson is a reprehensible little :censored:, or is he a "disgusting" sexual deviant? Can I choose both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 P.s. I am officially against slavery and child-labour, just to confirm. But not shagging child slaves if I'm reading you right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor_Coconut Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 So, Oldham Athletic..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De_La_Vega Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 But not shagging child slaves if I'm reading you right? You've got to leave yourself a little leeway right? (p.s. I am not actually condoning sexual abuse of child slaves, this is not a serious comment). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De_La_Vega Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Can I choose both? You can, but I'd be interested to know why you think he's a deviant sexual beast, when an awful lot of the world would see his choice as being acceptable. In Japan, for instance, the age of consent is well south of 16. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) You can, but I'd be interested to know why you think he's a deviant sexual beast, when an awful lot of the world would see his choice as being acceptable. In Japan, for instance, the age of consent is well south of 16.It's not here though. In the glorious Islamic State you can lob gays off cliffs, that ok here now? It's illegal to be gay in many countries. Oldham has a massive issue with the grooming of 13,14,15 year old kids by adults. It's f*cking appalling as is any justification of it. Edited February 14, 2016 by Clifford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De_La_Vega Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 It's not here though. In the glorious Islamic State you can lob gays off cliffs, that ok here now? It's illegal to be gay in many countries. Oldham has a massive issue with the grooming of 13,14,15 year old kids by adults. It's f*cking appalling as is any justification of it. What a debating tactic! Accuse anyone you suspect of having a different opinion of being an apologist for sexual abuse! For the record, I am not attempting to justify anything done by Adam Johnson, I am just trying to sift through your opinions to see whether you think that he's a disgusting sexual predator or just a douche bag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pie-eater Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 In 1976 Alan Groves, the Oldham winger, married a 16 year old girl who hadn't left school. Her father was fined £5 for not sending her to school !!! Johnson's behaviour needs to be kept in perspective. He isn't right whatsoever with his behaviour but to be labelling him a peadophile is not quite right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horlicks Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Leon Knight on Twitter showing himself to be one of the great legal minds of a generation with his views on the subject Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boundaryblue80 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 (edited) Also lets have it right, if found guilty Johnson meant his crimes. Hughes, Evans etc seem to have made mistakes or so they say and in some ways I would agree. The court has heard today that Johnson knew this girl was in year 10 (4th year in old money) and continued on anyway. If you are on twitter look at @joshhalliday for reports from court. Sickening stuff. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/12/adam-johnsons-arrogance-led-to-child-sexual-assault-court-told Yeah, coz Hughes didn't mean to hide away for 48 hrs afterwards due to being full of drink and drugs at the time. Some "mistake" that! Edited February 16, 2016 by boundaryblue80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Yeah, coz Hughes didn't mean to hide away for 48 hrs afterwards due to being full of drink and drugs at the time. Some "mistake" that! That being the main part of his crime, not the getting off his face (allegedly), driving and killing people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hank Kingsley Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 It's not here though. In the glorious Islamic State you can lob gays off cliffs, that ok here now? It's illegal to be gay in many countries. Oldham has a massive issue with the grooming of 13,14,15 year old kids by adults. It's f*cking appalling as is any justification of it. I find your comments a tad ironic considering what the guy in your avi is alleged to have done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc0000 Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 I find your comments a tad ironic considering what the guy in your avi is alleged to have done. Seems to escape him that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Seems to escape him that one The man who wrote Wired For Sound can do no wrong in my eyes, or the eyes of the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L1onheartNew Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Only 734 more pages to go before Johnson signs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hometownclub Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Nah, i think we can do it in under 16. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hank Kingsley Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Found not guilty on one count, jury still deciding on the other. He won't be doing time methinks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueatheart Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Found not guilty on one count, jury still deciding on the other. He won't be doing time methinks. A club will take the plunge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Found not guilty on one count, jury still deciding on the other. He won't be doing time methinks. There's a guilty plea for being naughty. High profile individual. I think he has to serve some time inside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_latics Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Guilty on other count. Judge: "custody almost inevitable" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAV Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 (edited) BREAKING NEWS. .... Bloke in red fleece just arrived in wetherspoons centenary square Bradford Bloke in red fleece has left been heard to say allegedly. ."don't worry I have a monthly train pass.See you in Sheffield on the 22nd" Edited March 2, 2016 by SAV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 "...facing up to 10 year in prison - with a starting point of five years - judge says." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.