Magister Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Put the fat lad in goal....Crofty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Hasn't Paul Robinson retired? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EASTLEY Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Cornell IS the worst keeper I've seen here in almost 40 years. He's still got some way to go to be Jan Budtz, but his confidence looks shot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Hasn't Paul Robinson retired? Even if he has I'd have him in nets over Cornell. I'd even have this one in nets: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Hasn't Paul Robinson retired? Reported training with Nottingham Forest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Can Danny P play in net? Why not, Dean Windass made a decent job of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueatheart Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Why not, Dean Windass made a decent job of it.Is Taylor catching at Blackburn? Still don't know how the ref didn't get sent down for match fixing that red card for Pogs at Vale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 I'd even have Greg Fleming back to replace Cornell. What's Dean Bouzanis up to these days? I wonder if he fancies coming back from Oz. See, we're all clutching at straws to resolve the keeper situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyPimp Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 See, we're all clutching at straws to resolve the keeper situation. Cornell would drop the straws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 I'd even have Greg Fleming back to replace Cornell. What's Dean Bouzanis up to these days? I wonder if he fancies coming back from Oz. See, we're all clutching at straws to resolve the keeper situation. Bouzanis is miles better than Cornell (and Coleman for that matter). But what did Coleman do wrong to be dropped for Cornell? Not a lot, as far as I can see. Given that scouts from bigger clubs were apparently sniffing around (not that I think he's he's ready to make a step up), I'm surprised Corney hasn't insisted he stays in the shop window. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 Bouzanis is miles better than Cornell (and Coleman for that matter). But what did Coleman do wrong to be dropped for Cornell? Not a lot, as far as I can see. Given that scouts from bigger clubs were apparently sniffing around (not that I think he's he's ready to make a step up), I'm surprised Corney hasn't insisted he stays in the shop window. He spilled Barnsleys winner, at the start of the season for the first 5 unbeaten he looked solid, was my mom at Colchester and played well at Walsall and Bury only conceded 3 in 5 but then looked shaky against Bradford and had a bad game at home to Peterborough (as did the other 10) he then came back for the 0-0 at Mansfield, kept goal in our next 2 games (both victories) before a mistake late on handed Barnsley all 3 points, out of all the players Dunn has had it in for his treatment and handling of Joel has been shocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusunga_Is_God Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Bouzanis is miles better than Cornell (and Coleman for that matter). But what did Coleman do wrong to be dropped for Cornell? Not a lot, as far as I can see. Given that scouts from bigger clubs were apparently sniffing around (not that I think he's he's ready to make a step up), I'm surprised Corney hasn't insisted he stays in the shop window. Because it's fairly obvious Dunn has something against playing certain players I wonder if he just falls out with them. Croft Hasn't played in a month drove Green to rip up his contract yeates named player of the month but then excluded and Poleon who had a couple of great games dropped completely and Coleman aswell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Cornell would drop the straws. Rumour has it that, after the game in the dressing room on Saturday, Cornell was upset over his mistake, put his head in his hands .... ... and promptly dropped it Bouzanis is miles better than Cornell (and Coleman for that matter). But what did Coleman do wrong to be dropped for Cornell? Not a lot, as far as I can see. Given that scouts from bigger clubs were apparently sniffing around (not that I think he's he's ready to make a step up), I'm surprised Corney hasn't insisted he stays in the shop window. Spot on. I'd have Bouzanis back just to see his 100yd sprints to celebrate a goal with his team mates. As for Coleman, unless he's chucking them in on a regular basis in training, he must be wondering what he has to do to get in the starting XI He spilled Barnsleys winner, at the start of the season for the first 5 unbeaten he looked solid, was my mom at Colchester and played well at Walsall and Bury only conceded 3 in 5 but then looked shaky against Bradford and had a bad game at home to Peterborough (as did the other 10) he then came back for the 0-0 at Mansfield, kept goal in our next 2 games (both victories) before a mistake late on handed Barnsley all 3 points, out of all the players Dunn has had it in for his treatment and handling of Joel has been shocking. Sums it up well. We know Coleman isn't the finished article, but he's only just old enough to start shaving (OK, poetic licence) and he will take time to develop. He'll make mistakes, but I can't believe he'll make the same howlers week in, week out that Cornell does. Because it's fairly obvious Dunn has something against playing certain players I wonder if he just falls out with them. Croft Hasn't played in a month drove Green to rip up his contract yeates named player of the month but then excluded and Poleon who had a couple of great games dropped completely and Coleman aswell. Baffling selections indeed. How can he leave Yeates on the bench when he's made such an impact when he has come on. Players are regressing instead of progressing. Is it all Dunn's fault? He's got his sidekicks as well who should be making some input. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzlatic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Because it's fairly obvious Dunn has something against playing certain players I wonder if he just falls out with them. Croft Hasn't played in a month drove Green to rip up his contract yeates named player of the month but then excluded and Poleon who had a couple of great games dropped completely and Coleman aswell. Myth busting... This list of players that Dunn treats badly, deliberately doesn't play etc. I just don't buy it. Yeates - Although I'd have him in the team, I think Dunn wants Philliskirk in to add defensive stability. When Jones was injured, Yeates played. Now Jones is back he might not feel he can play both him and Yeates and leave Philliskirk out. So whether you agree with this tactic or not, you can see why he's doing it. Poleon - had his best games alongside a big striker (Higdon). It was Higdon not being eligible that broke that partnership up. Since then he hasn't played as well. Now Murphy is in the side so who should Poleon come in instead of? Croft - hasn't played in a month? He's been injured!! Green - don't think this one is a Dunn thing, there are seemingly other factors involved. Winchester, Mills, Dieng, Murphy have all been on this list at other times too, but have since come back into the side. Coleman - I'll give you this one, he should be playing now. Or at the very least, Cornell should be dropped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boundaryblue80 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 (edited) The :censored: Coleman got for that Barnsley goal gets right on my tits. His defence dreadfully let him down...ok, he grabbed at the ball like a wet bar of soap and we were punished but :censored: me...Cornell cannot catch a ball full stop! Coleman was good at the end of last season, average at the start of this but his crucifixion all surrounds that one error when his defence left him in point-blank range of goal to be :censored: on. Saturdays summing up of Cornells 2nd half...spilled one ball he went to catch about 10 mins into the half. Failed to move off his line from an inswinging free-kick that I think it was Mills had to head away (not the incident that led to Dummigan heading out for a corner) and then he throws the ball into his own net. Someone above has said he's not yet as bad as Jan Budtz who I held as the worst keeper we've had but he does now. Even Budtz didn't throw them into his own goal. I'd be tempted to contact the suspicious betting folk after that on Saturday! Edited January 4, 2016 by boundaryblue80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 What have rabchuka, kenny, kean, etheridge and Cornell all got in common? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 He spilled Barnsleys winner, at the start of the season for the first 5 unbeaten he looked solid, was my mom at Colchester and played well at Walsall and Bury only conceded 3 in 5 but then looked shaky against Bradford and had a bad game at home to Peterborough (as did the other 10) he then came back for the 0-0 at Mansfield, kept goal in our next 2 games (both victories) before a mistake late on handed Barnsley all 3 points, out of all the players Dunn has had it in for his treatment and handling of Joel has been shocking. In one way, after Barnsley then handling the mantle back to Cornell at that point, Dunn hoped Cornell should have seized the chance. When Cornell then ballsed it up, he had to try and play Cornell back into to sort of form. That did not happened, obviosuly, but he did not drop him soon enough. These two keepers should be keeping each other on their toes, their mis-managment has led to this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Yeates - Although I'd have him in the team, I think Dunn wants Philliskirk in to add defensive stability. When Jones was injured, Yeates played. Now Jones is back he might not feel he can play both him and Yeates and leave Philliskirk out. So whether you agree with this tactic or not, you can see why he's doing it. The non selection of Yeates is disgraceful and simply cannot be justified. He's our best attacking outlet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlue Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 The non selection of Yeates is disgraceful and simply cannot be justified. He's our best attacking outlet. Absolutely. Unthinkable that he can achieve Player of the Month then not start the next 3. Unbelievable. Has to be Cassidy out, Yeates in, and Philliskirk, Winchester or Rasulo behind the striker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzlatic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Absolutely. Unthinkable that he can achieve Player of the Month then not start the next 3. Unbelievable. Has to be Cassidy out, Yeates in, and Philliskirk, Winchester or Rasulo behind the striker. But that would mean Murphy up front by himself then wouldn't it?I agree, Yeates should be in. My point was that I can see why he's doing it rather than there being some sinister reason. Dropping Cassidy leaves Murphy isolated. Dropping Philliskirk potentially leaves us with less defensive cover. A proper keeper and defence is probably the answer, then you wouldn't need to worry so much about shielding them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlue Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 (edited) But that would mean Murphy up front by himself then wouldn't it? I agree, Yeates should be in. My point was that I can see why he's doing it rather than there being some sinister reason. Dropping Cassidy leaves Murphy isolated. Dropping Philliskirk potentially leaves us with less defensive cover. A proper keeper and defence is probably the answer, then you wouldn't need to worry so much about shielding them. Yes. He's probably score if it was him on his own. His movement is good enough to not need a partner. Lafferty is set to return. Kelly and Wellens would be adequate cover for the centre backs. Philliskirk, Winchester or Rasulo could play an advanced role, threading balls to Murphy, while we have two quality wingers. Cassidy is not the answer and having two up front does not necessarily make you more attacking... Forte will be a bigger goal threat than Cassidy, when he returns Edited January 4, 2016 by NewBlue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzlatic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Yes. He's probably score if it was him on his own. His movement is good enough to not need a partner. Lafferty is set to return. Kelly and Wellens would be adequate cover for the centre backs. Philliskirk, Winchester or Rasulo could play an advanced role, threading balls to Murphy, while we have two quality wingers. Cassidy is not the answer and having two up front does not necessarily make you more attacking... Forte will be a bigger goal threat than Cassidy, when he returns Pretty much agree with all of that as long as the style of play reflects the type of striker Murphy is, which we haven't done before. No 442 though? Risking the wrath of the masses! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Yes. He's probably score if it was him on his own. His movement is good enough to not need a partner. Lafferty is set to return. Kelly and Wellens would be adequate cover for the centre backs. Philliskirk, Winchester or Rasulo could play an advanced role, threading balls to Murphy, while we have two quality wingers. Cassidy is not the answer and having two up front does not necessarily make you more attacking... Forte will be a bigger goal threat than Cassidy, when he returns Rasulo went back today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddot_m Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 How about we play people in their so called positions? Revolutionary I know... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0ndl1ne Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Get out jumped by David Worrall and you don't deserve to be a professional goalkeeper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.