Jump to content

Media coverage of Sheff Utd game


Recommended Posts

watched the first half hour on a stream - we looked good and were all over them! i went out, came back and saw we were 1-0 down, before turning 5Live on and hearing the goal! Looking forward to the FLS to see what they think, hopefully we've done a good account of ourselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought it was going to be perfect but Clucking Bell!!!! They completely missed out Smith's header and the chance Simpson had. Like has been mentioned they can't possibly show ikkle Owdam play well, I mean they're not a real Football club they only get 3000 at home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the plus side, at least Claridge wasn't on tonight...

I was gutted, I was looking forward to him having a face like a slapped arse like he always does if Paul Dickov's in danger of getting any credit. (did something go on with them two when they were at Leicester? He really seems to hate him.) But if he had been on he probably would have just seized on the Croft incident. Or maybe I'm being harsh on him, maybe he would have defended him like he defended Millwall last week after the Bolton game - "I can tell you, that will only have been one or two people shouting abuse" - really, Steve? Were you there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought it was going to be perfect but Clucking Bell!!!! They completely missed out Smith's header and the chance Simpson had. Like has been mentioned they can't possibly show ikkle Owdam play well, I mean they're not a real Football club they only get 3000 at home

 

Write to the BBC, hopefully they will get the message if enough people complain, here's what I just sent (i'm aware there are probably a load of mistakes but it was already 20 minutes of my life I won't be getting back!)

 

 

I would like to draw your attention to The Football League Show aired 13/10/2013 and specifically the Sheffield United vs Oldham Athletic “featured” game. I have a number of issues with the programme – notably bias and the quality of the programme itself in relation to previous weeks (basically when the championship teams are in action).

 

Firstly looking at the “featured” game itself, footage of the game lasted for just short of 7 minutes, of which nearly an entire minute was spent babbling about a nothing incident between Oldham’s Lee Croft and a ball boy who kicks the ball away. Regarding this I think it’s fairly obvious that Lee Croft said something to the ball boy (although highly unlikely to be racist to anyone other than a complete moron) who was basically doing the complete opposite of the job he is paid to do. So in summary we have around 6 minutes of action for a “featured” game which to me seems hardly substantial. In fact it wouldn’t be a surprise to see 6 minutes of footage in standard online highlights. Moving on to the content there seems a clear imbalance when viewing the 6 minutes of footage in context of the stats (produced by the BBC) for the game. Taken from the BBC’s stats Oldham have 14 shots on target to Sheffield United’s 5 and 19 shots in total to 7. From this you would clearly expect that the majority of chances shown are from Oldham. Unfortunately it appears that this didn’t fit the brief for the game. The chances shown in the order in which they happened are as follows:

First Half

Oldham - Simpson long range drive with Derbyshire follow up

Second Half

Sheffield United – Williams over hit cross

Sheffield United – Doyle long range shot

Sheffield United – Penalty award and goal

Oldham – Derbyshire chance

Sheffield United – Flynn chance

Oldham – Smith goal

Looking first at the opening 45 minutes, the action has been surmised by one chance a disallowed goal for offside (which from the footage you can actually see is onside - a fact that the BBC commentator decides to ignore or just not understand which would be quite worrying). The first half actually had 2 shots on target from Sheffield United to Oldham’s 8(eight). This is clearly not reflected in the footage. It actually makes it look like very little happened in the first half (something reinforced by the BBC commentator in the second half when he exclaims “a much better start to this second half” with no mention of specifically towards Sheffield United after they finally manage a shot on goal) whilst in fact Oldham had a number of chances, notably almost scoring in the opening minute through a Simpson header and having 7 other shots on target. Although already a picture of how the footage has been edited is becoming clear, the second half to me is even more damning. I mean, how can you edit a half of football to make one team appear to be dominating when they’ve barely been able to get out of their own half? In the second half by use of mathematics(!) I have deduced that the shot count on target is Sheffield United 3 to Oldham’s 6, at least some way to being respectable. Somehow out of 3 shots on target however the BBC has managed to get 4 pieces of footage for Sheffield United. By all accounts this is at best absolutely pathetic and clear bias as an over hit cross is somehow regarded as a better chance than real clear cut chances such as a second chance for Derbyshire, a header by Smith that was well saved and earlier in the half a couple of strikes by Montano all of which were far more note-worthy than an over hit cross that you can clearly see from the replay the goalkeeper is comfortable with. From the stats and from actually watching the game you it’s obvious that Oldham dominated the game in both halves, instead we have a poorly edited highlights footage which somehow gives the complete opposite impression. From Oldham’s 14 shots on target to Sheffield United’s 5 we somehow end up with highlights that show 3 Oldham Chances to Sheffield United’s 4, please explain how this could possibly happen? It seems that because Sheffield United is a big club the BBC has gone all out to appease their fans and to pander to and reinforce the uninformed perceptions of the average armchair fan. A truly poor effort.

Moving on to my second point, the coverage was much less comprehensive than it normally would be for a featured game. I understand there is less interest in League One than the Championship, but this week there are no Championship games and so League One and League Two take centre stage and it is a chance for clubs who wouldn’t normally be in the limelight to get some decent media coverage. Instead it was almost like the BBC had been begrudgingly forced to cover Leagues One and Two, a token gesture of support to the lower leagues. In normal circumstances, featured games get much longer highlights and then some analysis from Leroy Rosenoir or Steve Claridge or both. On this occasion, you couldn’t even be bothered having the programme in the studio, a pathetic attempt at a subtle disguise for the fact you didn’t want to pay Steve to waffle on about big clubs being massive. Instead we had Manish wandering around Prenton Park an hour before kick off. So purely because the Championship weren’t playing the BBC put out an appalling excuse for the football league show. Whilst we’re talking about the shows general poor quality I would also like to point out that the guy you interviewed after the Tranmere v Yeovil game was not Gary Johnson as stated, it was Tony Skiverton. I’m not a Yeovil fan, I don’t follow Yeovil with any great enthusiasm but even I as a casual onlooker of the football league knew that wasn’t Gary Johnson. That is just plain lazy.

 

Here you had a chance to give League One and League Two some proper coverage with the Championship not playing. Instead it seems to have been seen as a chance to save some money. One featured game in which the whole focus appears to have been on making the ‘big team’ look big… and no attempt at any analysis of either division or game other than the bias comments of the commentator. I expect this from Sky where they have an ulterior motive to do this but the BBC has shown itself here; that was atrocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give us the email to send it to and I'll send it.

 

Unfortunately the BBC are even more useless than i first thought and can't deal with a complaint that's more than 1500 characters long, so i had to split it up into 4 separate complaints each time quoting my previous complaints reference number, in all it took 10 mins to send it all and get each ref (which the email you). They will receive it all but they don;t make things easy. You're best condensing it down to save yourself the hassle, here's where you complain http://www.bbc.co.uk...omplain-online/

 

Or you can mail to

 

BBC Complaints,

PO Box 1922,

Darlington DL3 0UR

Edited by LeylandLatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...