Jump to content

Notes from Fans' Meeting with Chairman et al 24/1/2017

Guest nonaenever

By Guest nonaenever
in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Scapegoat Rick Holden

Scapegoat

Posted
Posted

Wrongly, the 3 Companies do not even have common owners.

Whilst I don't disagree that there are different owners - for me our "club" is the combination of the three entities. And given the interaction between the three organisations, they for me are intrinsically linked to each other for their survival.

 

Also, aren't the owners of the three predominantly TTA in various combinations?

 

I sit on a board of a company with 10 subsidiary companies, and the make up of the individual subsidiary boards are a mixture of different members of the main board - plus a few extras from other organisations that are appropriate to that specific company.

 

I may be wrong, but I didn't see anything suspicious about the ownership of the different companies.

 

In fact, where there is a contractual relationship between 2 companies that have an extremely close connection, it's good practice to have different people on the boards to ensure people can carry out director duties without conflict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChaddySmoker Rick Holden

ChaddySmoker

Posted
Posted

Whilst I don't disagree that there are different owners

Also, aren't the owners of the three predominantly TTA in various combinations?

No not anymore.

 

I sit on a board of a company with 10 subsidiary companies, and the make up of the individual subsidiary boards are a mixture of different members of the main board - plus a few extras from other organisations that are appropriate to that specific company.

There is obviously nothing wrong with different board members for different Companies.

We have 3 different Companies, 1 with totally different board members AND different owner(s.)

 

I may be wrong, but I didn't see anything suspicious about the ownership of the different companies.

A month ago, I would have agreed but not after recent changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
whittles left foot Earl Barrett

whittles left foot

Posted
Posted

Are you Simon? ....they all emanate from the same source.What a smoke screen you are

creating.We need Mr Keegan on your case lol.

 

Oh dear. You have dipped your toe into waters that only certain posters are allowed to discuss with any certain knowledge-any other perspective is dismissed.

 

What they have achieved with this knowledge only they seem to know how useful it is but they like to preen themselves with the latest update from Companies House.

 

So far it has not made any difference to either the ownership or the sale of the club.

 

Funny, it is the second time in 2 days that one of the posters has been compared to Simon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChaddySmoker Rick Holden

ChaddySmoker

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Oh dear. You have dipped your toe into waters that only certain posters are allowed to discuss with any certain knowledge-any other perspective is dismissed.

 

What they have achieved with this knowledge only they seem to know how useful it is but they like to preen themselves with the latest update from Companies House.

 

So far it has not made any difference to either the ownership or the sale of the club.

 

Funny, it is the second time in 2 days that one of the posters has been compared to Simon.

I think that the lol gave a rather large clue! You OK sight screen?

Edited by ChaddySmoker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scapegoat Rick Holden

Scapegoat

Posted
Posted

No not anymore.

 

There is obviously nothing wrong with different board members for different Companies.

We have 3 different Companies, 1 with totally different board members AND different owner(s.)

 

A month ago, I would have agreed but not after recent changes

Missed the subtleties of this.

 

What has happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChaddySmoker Rick Holden

ChaddySmoker

Posted
Posted

Missed the subtleties of this.

 

What has happened?

Whilst it has been common knowledge that Brassbank is owned by 2 Amigos from the US and that OAFC 2004 Ltd is 100% owned and run by Corney,

Oldham Event Centre seemed to be a link between the 2 in respect of ownership and directorships.

OEC Ltd seems now to be exactly as Brassbank since 30th March 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stevie_J John Sheridan

Stevie_J

Posted
Posted

Whilst it has been common knowledge that Brassbank is owned by 2 Amigos from the US and that OAFC 2004 Ltd is 100% owned and run by Corney,

Oldham Event Centre seemed to be a link between the 2 in respect of ownership and directorships.

OEC Ltd seems now to be exactly as Brassbank since 30th March 2016.

You've omitted to mention the Trust's 3%, which allows the fans the opportunity to have a representative at the club's board meetings. That is, when the representative is invited to be there at the time such meetings get underway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChaddySmoker Rick Holden

ChaddySmoker

Posted
Posted (edited)

You've omitted to mention the Trust's 3%, which allows the fans the opportunity to have a representative at the club's board meetings. That is, WHEN the representative is invited to be there at the time such meetings get underway.

I did realise that whilst typing but was trying to be concise and the 3% are non voting shares so I treated them as others do-somewhat irrelevant!

Whilst on the subject I have been quite surprised that the Trust have been silent whilst others are talking about forming a new supporters group

Edited by ChaddySmoker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
deyres42 John Sheridan

deyres42

Posted
Posted

Whilst it has been common knowledge that Brassbank is owned by 2 Amigos from the US and that OAFC 2004 Ltd is 100% owned and run by Corney,

Oldham Event Centre seemed to be a link between the 2 in respect of ownership and directorships.

OEC Ltd seems now to be exactly as Brassbank since 30th March 2016.

In your humble opinion, on a scale of 1-10, how highly should we be alarmed by this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jorvik_latic Rick Holden

jorvik_latic

Posted
Posted

I have been quite surprised that the Trust have been silent whilst others are talking about forming a new supporters group

Nope. NNN has met with 2 representatives of the Trust and reported back that that they are fine and supportive of what he is doing. Didn't think it needed any more than that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
underdog David Eyres

underdog

Posted
Posted (edited)

Wasnt aware of that. Thank you.

Think you may have been..."incommunicado for a few days..cough, cough". Think it was about the time volunteers were asked to met corney in the original thread. Welli think it was you...hmmm

Edited by underdog
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Scapegoat Rick Holden

Scapegoat

Posted
Posted

 

No point, didn't the instigator or leader of the group clearly state they wouldn't report back on here? Due to some adverse comments.

I hope that isn't the case.

 

Cannot please all the the people, but I'd hope that there was enough positive comments to show it was worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...