Jump to content

Benteke Signs


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, HarryBosch said:

Strangest career profile we've possibly ever seen in a signing.

 

2 goals in 20 at his first club in the Belgian 2nd division - probably a worse standard than ours (I'm guessing)

2 in 25 in the Belgian top flight - possibly Chapionship standard, sometimes.

Then he signed for a Premier League side who saw enough to give him a run out but then he got injured. 

 

He could be really good, he could be shite. 

 

In future the club website people would do well to refer to players with such poor scoring records as "forwards" rather than "strikers" :grin:

 

 

Is it an idea to have a special song for someone on the bench who has not played yet? 

Jonathan Benteke we don't know what you're like

You could be really good and you could be really shite

Jonathan, rat ta tat ta tat ta tat, Benteke, rat ta tat ta tat ta tat tat tat.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, AlanGrovesFanClub said:

Is it an idea to have a special song for someone on the bench who has not played yet? 

Jonathan Benteke we don't know what you're like

You could be really good and you could be really shite

Jonathan, rat ta tat ta tat ta tat, Benteke, rat ta tat ta tat ta tat tat tat.......

 

I like it but it's probably a bit upbeat for the Athletico's.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, HarryBosch said:

I hope Benteke's better than these attempts at humour... 

I thought mine was decent, nobody agreed :unsure:

5 hours ago, cmr said:

What are we doing signing a striker with no record? doesn't even have any misdemeanors for drugs or owt

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bristolatic said:

What about Nazon?

 

46 minutes ago, stevesidg said:

And Duckens 

Christ I’d alreasy forgotten about him. Makes it even more of an odd signing unless he’s got the ability to play wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not knocking the signing, but surely another player at the back was more important than a 6th striker. I can’t understand how they can even work out the better combinations of forwards during training sessions - any 2 from 6 gives 30 combinations if my maths serves me well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, steveecky said:

Not knocking the signing, but surely another player at the back was more important than a 6th striker. I can’t understand how they can even work out the better combinations of forwards during training sessions - any 2 from 6 gives 30 combinations if my maths serves me well.

15 I think. Still a few

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, steveecky said:

Not knocking the signing, but surely another player at the back was more important than a 6th striker. I can’t understand how they can even work out the better combinations of forwards during training sessions - any 2 from 6 gives 30 combinations if my maths serves me well.

Maybe there are no defenders available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, steveecky said:

Not knocking the signing, but surely another player at the back was more important than a 6th striker. I can’t understand how they can even work out the better combinations of forwards during training sessions - any 2 from 6 gives 30 combinations if my maths serves me well.

It's 25 combinations, being 6 * 5 = 30 - 5 duplicates = 25. However, this seems sensible to me. One striker is out ill until mid March, so it's really 5. Another (CD) has been very ill and seems to have not yet got back to full strength. So that leaves 4, being 2 to play and 2 to come on if needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, AlanGrovesFanClub said:

It's 25 combinations, being 6 * 5 = 30 - 5 duplicates = 25. However, this seems sensible to me. One striker is out ill until mid March, so it's really 5. Another (CD) has been very ill and seems to have not yet got back to full strength. So that leaves 4, being 2 to play and 2 to come on if needed. 

You'd be counting Doyle with Davies and Davis with Doyle, No?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...