sjk2008 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Does Micky stick with 352 or is this now the time to change it up? With Hogan suspended again, McGahey being shite, and with the players we’ve brought in, I feel now is the perfect time to switch to a back 4. Id go… Hudson Sachdev - Hobson - Raglan - Kitching Lundstram - Conlon - Sheron Walker - Norwood - Dallas Subs Norman Sutton Hammond Fondop Garner If we can bring in someone like Cian Hayes or a ball playing, tough tackling midfielder to replace Sheron, I think it would transform us. None the less, I fancy the good away form to continue here. 1-3 (Norwood, Dallas, Sheron) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyyou Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Suspect it's 3-5-2 again but, at some stage, wouldn't mind a 4-2-3-1 Hudson Sachdev Hobson Raglan Kitching Sheron Conlon Walker Norwood Dallas Garner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, Boyyou said: Suspect it's 3-5-2 again but, at some stage, wouldn't mind a 4-2-3-1 Hudson Sachdev Hobson Raglan Kitching Sheron Conlon Walker Norwood Dallas Garner Would MM risk Hammond for Sheron I wonder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 When we see the team sheet and its an unchanged team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 (edited) It’s a gamble to play all the new lads tbh as it equates to half a team. It’s a bit like preseason when players are getting to know each other. 2 or 3 haven’t played too much of late either so we’re probably going to have to show a little patience while they get up to speed. Edited February 1 by oafc1955 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukers1 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 I’d possible I’d give Josh a break, his form so far is pretty poor. Keep him on the bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsEddie Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 I dont think Dallas is fit enough to start just yet so I reckon a 352, unchanged from Saturday or Garner for Fondop. I think we might switch to 433 at some point too with Walker and Dallas coming on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 49 minutes ago, LaticsEddie said: I dont think Dallas is fit enough to start just yet so I reckon a 352, unchanged from Saturday or Garner for Fondop. I think we might switch to 433 at some point too with Walker and Dallas coming on. Who on earth would go unchanged from Saturday?, McGahey shouldn't be anywhere near our starting eleven, add to that he was piss poor in the reverse fixture when we were battered 4-1 at BP as Ebbsfleet ran rings round him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Is Hogan still suspended? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcfluff1985 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Just now, Dave_Og said: Is Hogan still suspended? Think so, yeah. 2 games suspension Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 15 minutes ago, yarddog73 said: Who on earth would go unchanged from Saturday?, McGahey shouldn't be anywhere near our starting eleven, add to that he was piss poor in the reverse fixture when we were battered 4-1 at BP as Ebbsfleet ran rings round him. As it's worked for recent away games I'd keep with the 3-5-2 to start with, but I agree that I wouldn't start McGahey. Sutton as a like-for-like change would be it for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 2 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: Is Hogan still suspended? Just for this game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsEddie Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 hour ago, yarddog73 said: Who on earth would go unchanged from Saturday?, McGahey shouldn't be anywhere near our starting eleven, add to that he was piss poor in the reverse fixture when we were battered 4-1 at BP as Ebbsfleet ran rings round him. Who else are you putting there? Who else are you going to put in the midfield? But for suspension, thats the strongest side we have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 (edited) 1 hour ago, LaticsEddie said: Who else are you putting there? Who else are you going to put in the midfield? But for suspension, thats the strongest side we have So who does Garner and Dallas come in for then? McGahey isn't in our strongest eleven, he doesn't even make my 16. I'd rather play Sheron on the left of a back three if that's the way we are going to set up. Sooner we can go with a 4-3-3 the better for me. Personally I'd go; Hudson Sutton Hobson Raglan Kitching Gardner Conlon Lundstrum Garner Norwood Dallas Norman Sheron Green Walker Fondop As a front 6 that gives us half a chance of imposing ourselves on teams. Edited February 1 by yarddog73 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Aren't Dallas and Garner strikers rather than wide forwards? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 4 minutes ago, deyres42 said: Aren't Dallas and Garner strikers rather than wide forwards? Yes probably although although all three could probably play in behind a two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsEddie Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 2 hours ago, yarddog73 said: So who does Garner and Dallas come in for then? McGahey isn't in our strongest eleven, he doesn't even make my 16. I'd rather play Sheron on the left of a back three if that's the way we are going to set up. Sooner we can go with a 4-3-3 the better for me. Personally I'd go; Hudson Sutton Hobson Raglan Kitching Gardner Conlon Lundstrum Garner Norwood Dallas Norman Sheron Green Walker Fondop As a front 6 that gives us half a chance of imposing ourselves on teams. I think 4-3-3 will come but Dallas isnt match fit yet, and integral to it. Barely played for Killie and only a 30 min run out on Saturday. I dont know where Garner fits in tbh, I think he's a replacement for Fondop in that he is someone you can lump it up to but with a lot more footy smarts. Out of the CB options we have, McGahey is unfortunately the best option for LCB. Id like Sutton to have a run out but I dont think id trust him on the left side. That must be one of the targets for summer, a left footed CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyyou Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 33 minutes ago, LaticsEddie said: I think 4-3-3 will come but Dallas isnt match fit yet, and integral to it. Barely played for Killie and only a 30 min run out on Saturday. I dont know where Garner fits in tbh, I think he's a replacement for Fondop in that he is someone you can lump it up to but with a lot more footy smarts. Out of the CB options we have, McGahey is unfortunately the best option for LCB. Id like Sutton to have a run out but I dont think id trust him on the left side. That must be one of the targets for summer, a left footed CB. Been banging on about a left-footed CB all season. It does offer better balance and it's a bonus squad wise if said CB can fill in at LB if required. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsEddie Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 12 minutes ago, Boyyou said: Been banging on about a left-footed CB all season. It does offer better balance and it's a bonus squad wise if said CB can fill in at LB if required. Luckily there's some decent ones for this level and league 2 who will be available on a free come June. Turnbull at Tranmere, Frazer Blake-Tracy at Swindon, James Husband at Blackpool to name a few Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightDN123 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 I just don’t see this shift to a 433 and confused how Dallas and Walker fit in to be honest. The team seems even more like a scatter gun approach to me at this point. How do we fit in, Norwood, Garner, Dallas, Fondop, Walker, Green, Reid. Then we have Kurt, Tollitt, Nuttall, Shelton, Ward, Dickinson. All surplus to requirements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 3 minutes ago, LightDN123 said: I just don’t see this shift to a 433 and confused how Dallas and Walker fit in to be honest. The team seems even more like a scatter gun approach to me at this point. How do we fit in, Norwood, Garner, Dallas, Fondop, Walker, Green, Reid. Then we have Kurt, Tollitt, Nuttall, Shelton, Ward, Dickinson. All surplus to requirements. We don’t need to fit in Reid or Green but I get your points otherwise. I’d be surprised if both featured much at all for the rest of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightDN123 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 29 minutes ago, daniel said: We don’t need to fit in Reid or Green but I get your points otherwise. I’d be surprised if both featured much at all for the rest of the season. We need Reid to keep Kitch happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 14 minutes ago, LightDN123 said: We need Reid to keep Kitch happy. Are they a couple or co-habiting, if not I don't see the connection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Just now, disjointed said: Are they a couple or co-habiting, if not I don't see the connection. Co-habiting, I'm not sure if one is the other's landlord or what but they live in the same flat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 19 minutes ago, rudemedic said: Co-habiting, I'm not sure if one is the other's landlord or what but they live in the same flat. Cheers doc, if Kitch just needs someone to do his cooking, I will drive Reid to whichever team wants him and batch cook some meals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.