HarryBosch Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 Watching the highlights of yesterday back it looks grim with the front of the Chaddy End being empty, i.e no Coventry fans there as they were all at the back. Considering we're on TV (albeit briefly) every game would it not be better advertising aimed at the fairweather fan if the camera's actually captured the same paltry number of fans celebrating and making the ground look a bit fuller/livelier? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 I wondered whether the decision to put the away fans in the upper section has come from the management. Keep their fans further back, theory of marginal gains and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueatheart Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 Probably easier to steward... not along the front only at the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 I wondered whether the decision to put the away fans in the upper section has come from the management.if that is the reason and we keep on winning at home, :censored: the TV viewer. Keep their fans further back, theory of marginal gains and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_latics Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 Haven't Cov fans been invading the pitch in recent weeks against their owners? Think we may have stuck them up there to avoid any "unsavoury scenes." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 I wondered whether the decision to put the away fans in the upper section has come from the management. Keep their fans further back, theory of marginal gains and all that. A good theory if we confiscated their acoustics but they took them to the back anyway.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 Haven't Cov fans been invading the pitch in recent weeks against their owners? Think we may have stuck them up there to avoid any "unsavoury scenes." Aah, a better theory. Makes sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 We have a handy opportunity to ask this question tomorrow, will feed back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosa Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 I assumed they were being soft arses and were trying to get out of the rain/sleet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stagger Lee Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 (edited) I assumed they were being soft arses and were trying to get out of the rain/sleet. They came to Ice station Zebra unprepared for rain / sleet ? Maybe there is money to be made by the trust selling ponchos, Kendall mint cake and a Bear Grylls survival DVD for those visiting boundary park from south of the Runcorn - Grimsby axis Edited February 13, 2017 by Stagger Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scapegoat Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 There are a number of times this season that away fans have been consigned to the back of the chaddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlue Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 I wondered whether the decision to put the away fans in the upper section has come from the management. Keep their fans further back, theory of marginal gains and all that. Got Corney written all over that theory, must say... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Haven't Cov fans been invading the pitch in recent weeks against their owners? Think we may have stuck them up there to avoid any "unsavoury scenes."That's about the size of it. They've taken to throwing lots of different types of balls onto pitches recently. As it turns out they were well behaved, perhaps in awe of the acoustics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddySmoker Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) Do the Trust know if we have borrowed off Necarcu Ltd......................................again? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04989487/charges Edited March 2, 2017 by ChaddySmoker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) Do the Trust know if we have borrowed off Necarcu Ltd......................................again? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04989487/charges If it worked last year to keep the club going I suppose it might work again. Which players can we sell though this time, or are investors a reality? Edited March 3, 2017 by BP1960 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Do the Trust know if we have borrowed off Necarcu Ltd......................................again? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04989487/charges Question noted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Do the Trust know if we have borrowed off Necarcu Ltd......................................again? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04989487/charges I have notice LL has picked this up. In my opinion, I will presume it was discussed at board level and your trust represented was advised of the meeting for it to be discussed that this was in the pipeline. I did however miss our Feb trust meeting so we could well have been briefed that this was happening Tba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Maybe it was covered in the financials section where the meeting time didn't quite reach every board member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Maybe it was covered in the financials section where the meeting time didn't quite reach every board member. But it would be covered in the minutes - wouldn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 But it would be covered in the minutes - wouldn't it? Maybe somebody coughed at the crucial moment meaning the minute taker didn't hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted March 3, 2017 Author Share Posted March 3, 2017 Necarcu is Romanian for "Brassbank". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddySmoker Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Question noted Thank you Sir. I have notice LL has picked this up. In my opinion, I will presume it was discussed at board level and your trust represented was advised of the meeting for it to be discussed that this was in the pipeline. I did however miss our Feb trust meeting so we could well have been briefed that this was happening Tba I wouldnt presume anything with the board at OAFC. It may have simply been presented as a fait accompli by our wonderful leader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Thank you Sir. I wouldnt presume anything with the board at OAFC. It may have simply been presented as a fait accompli by our wonderful leader. I suppose it's what I think should happen especially when the fans have 3% representation, but what I know of how a business/boardroom should run. Haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 Necarcu is Romanian for "Brassbank". I thought it was Latin for 'undisclosed' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 http://www.sailingforhome.com/blog/nec-gladio-nec-arcu So, no bow then. My Latin O Level form 1978 didn't provide me with the ability to translate "not a pot to piss in" into Latin but that's what Google translate is for: non ut vas in mingentem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.