Jump to content

kowenicki'smoustache

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kowenicki'smoustache

  1. 1 hour ago, Bristolatic said:

    Yep, I saw him in pre-season at Salisbury. He had very little to do and looked about 13 years old. Certainly couldn't judge him off that game.

    Yes, they brought Casillas [sic] in (no, not Iker) although Peacock-Farrell looked a solid keeper when I watched Quest highlights.

    I was at that Salisbury friendly. I thought Gerard had eaten Croft and they'd put a ball boy in goal... but you're right, couldn't judge the keeper on that game.

  2. On 7/17/2019 at 12:01 PM, lookersstandandy said:

    There are some OWTB personalities missing from the Prediction League participants list from over the years, it would enhance the competition & be great to have some of the following involved;

     

    @alwaysblue, @archiecat, @boundaryblue80, @ChaddySmoker, @Clifford, @Crusoe, @deyres42, @Gaz_Oafc@Hands on@kowenicki, @kowenicki'smoustache, @Lags, @latics22, @League one forever, @Londonboy, @mikejh45, @OAFCMIKE@oafcshuck, @OLDHAMADE, @PlayItLivo@Ritchierich, @sjk2008, @the_mighty_bosh@unsworth blue, @unsworthlatic, @UsedtobeWozzer, @wiseowl, @Worcester Owl

     

    Please take a read of this thread / Keep popping back in as I explain more about how it works and what's new.

    In... although expecting to be sacked before Christmas!

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, Londonboy said:

     

    Carlo had his limitations but should be nowhere near our worst striker nominations. Its all relative I guess, depending on the level we were playing at the time.

     

    I can remember back in the late 70's, big Jim Steel seeming a bit shit to me as a 10/11 year old fan....he used to get loads of stick from the old Ford Stand paddock in his early days with us.

     

    However he'd walk into our current side and probably score a shitload!

    In the days of Wylde and Stainrod, Steel seemed a bit of a downgrade. Different type of plyer. Wasn't terrible though, and put a shift in...

  4. 1 hour ago, Lags said:

     

    That statement is also true. There is where the lines blur for me. I will repeat what I said back then, it's very unusual for a prisoner to be released pending an appeal. That for me signalled all involved knew the appeal outcome. 

    IIRC, I don't think he was released pending appeal. He served two and a half years before being released on licence. This is standard for most prisoners. The appeal came much later. There is lots of room for discussion about second chances etc of course...

  5. Torquay because the Mrs supports them... Promoted to Conference this year (under Gary Johnson) - Torquay, not the Mrs... I've seen them play twice at Wembley too😳. Greenock Morton because I have a very close friend who comes from there. We alternate trips to see Latics and the Ton. As a consequence we are both perpetually miserable.

  6. 9 minutes ago, underdog said:

    thanks. 

     

    It has made me doubt myself a little. 

     

    I will be okay tomorrow

     

    At least we got some points today and a clean sheet..whoop

    Don't doubt yourself. People like him are not worth wasting time on. You do a great job of keeping us informed. It's interesting that he has chosen you to have a go at. Easier than someone 'his own size'. Sad man. Keep up the good work in the knowledge that genuine Latics fans support you (or at least your right to do what you do without feeling threatened). 

    • Like 1
  7. I'd like to say well done to the trust for organising yesterday's meeting. AL must surely take note of 150 fans (and more unable to attend) meeting on his doorstep. Of course, he may not care.

    I think the tone was just about right and a sensible initial course of action is in place. A timescale was agreed for a response from AL and the ball is very much in his court. 

    Should he not respond in an acceptable way within this timescale, then I think we must accept that he will never engage and we should move forwards accordingly. Acceptable includes answering the questions that are put to him satisfactorily.

    I know that many people want some action now, but I believe that a couple more weeks won't do any harm. Like it or not, he owns the football club. If he will work with the fans, great. If not then we look at how best to proceed without his engagement. 

    FWIW I don't think he will ever engage in a constructive and honest way. 

  8. 12 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

     

    Good luck with that. I suspect some of those attending have a different view/aim. 

     

     

    I'm hoping for a constructive discussion that leads to a clarity of purpose for the trust going forward. This is, of course, difficult with 150 people all with a huge emotional attachment to the club and each with their views. Worth a try...

  9. The current situation with the owner has really brought it home to me what Latics have meant to me over the years. I saw my first game in 1972. I was a season ticket holder for some years before departing for London in 1983 (I contrived to miss virtually all of the good times!). I started going with my Dad. He passed away 18 months ago and I'm sure that I can hear him spinning in his urn!

     

    My job as a publican has meant that opportunities to watch games have been very few and far between. I probably make 1 or 2 home games and 4 or 5 away games each year.

     

    It seems to me that now is the time to choose whether we want a club or not. If we do then this fella has to go. We've had some bad 'uns before, but this bloke's setting new standards.

     

    Anyway, for once in my life I'm going get of my ample backside and make an effort to contribute to the cause. I have booked a train ticket and hotel, and I'm going to attend. I look forward to meeting you all and to finding a constructive and positive way forward...

    • Like 13
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...