Dave_Og Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, BP1960 said: Thee are no grounds in the Oldham Borough that meet EFL standards are there? Just the one.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, pcscorchio said: Does (or did in pre-Biblical times) FC UoM, by some bizarre post code lottery quirk, have a corner flag in Oldham? We could play there and just go for a point by keeping it in that corner for 90 minutes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Dave_Og said: Just the one.... So far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Dave_Og said: We could play there and just go for a point by keeping it in that corner for 90 minutes Don't reveal our Forest Green tactics on here. Edited July 31, 2019 by BP1960 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiseowl Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 I think that moving Latics from BP - particularly as far away as somewhere like the AJ Bell (end) would sound the death knell. FFS we struggle to get the locals down Sheepfoot Lane! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 He wouldn't get away with not paying rent at the AJ Bell..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 On 7/28/2019 at 12:13 PM, boundaryblue80 said: He left because the job wasn’t what he wanted. The position of manager was no longer available (a position which would include signing of players). The position offered was Head Coach. If a director or chairman or Head of Football or whoever then signs players, that isn’t interference. I know folk want to promote is that...but it isn’t. That is club policy now. Just like how Ole at the scum won’t sign players or Klopp at Liverpool etc. Fans still haven’t got their heads around the fact the club has moved to that style. Which AL is perfectly entitled to do. Considering AL and whoever he may have as backers is putting in the money to do this, for now, they deserve time to see how it pans out. Promotion in 2yrs he said right? Let’s see it then. Wildy was already head ‘coach’. The idea that we are following the continental model with Mo as our sporting director is laughable. Firstly, there is no pressure on ML to do a good job, his job is completely safe regardless of the quality of signings he makes because he is a relative of the owner. In the European model the position is highly scrutinised and clubs aren’t afraid to change the individual if they aren’t recruiting a good standard of player. Secondly, the powers of the sporting director vary between clubs with some having complete autonomy over transfer dealings whilst others just simply act as a negotiator on behalf of the gaffer who identifies his own targets. However, in all instances the head coach still retains complete control over team affairs from tactics to matchday selection which clearly isn’t the case at Latics. Can you imagine Pep putting up with Txiki telling him who to play and having senior players banished to the naughty step whilst forced to train with youth team? Haha! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 8 hours ago, robboman said: So he would be happy paying rent for the AJ Bell, but not for Boundary Park, because the FLG have upset him. Beggars belief. He might get 299 watching their, costing him more money. What an imbecile he is. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League one forever Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 26 minutes ago, Ryan said: Wildy was already head ‘coach’. The idea that we are following the continental model with Mo as our sporting director is laughable. Firstly, there is no pressure on ML to do a good job, his job is completely safe regardless of the quality of signings he makes because he is a relative of the owner. In the European model the position is highly scrutinised and clubs aren’t afraid to change the individual if they aren’t recruiting a good standard of player. Secondly, the powers of the sporting director vary between clubs with some having complete autonomy over transfer dealings whilst others just simply act as a negotiator on behalf of the gaffer who identifies his own targets. However, in all instances the head coach still retains complete control over team affairs from tactics to matchday selection which clearly isn’t the case at Latics. Can you imagine Pep putting up with Txiki telling him who to play and having senior players banished to the naughty step whilst forced to train with youth team? Haha! Spot on. According to BB80 though he stopped interfering after Scholes left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 5 minutes ago, al_bro said: So he would be happy paying rent for the AJ Bell, but not for Boundary Park, because the FLG have upset him. Beggars belief. He might get 299 watching their, costing him more money. What an imbecile he is. Would be funny if he merely contacted them for a quote and then that is as far as it got when he saw how much the going rate was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League one forever Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 I’m really starting to think that AL would have us playing evo stick at stalybridge than contemplate working with anyone. Let alone the FLG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) On 7/29/2019 at 9:11 AM, boundaryblue80 said: The Necarcu debt is Corneys liability which AL has stated he is suing him for not undertaking his obligations. You asked for what he’s done. You’ve poured you negativity all over it. Well done. I dont agree with almost all of your “narrative” above but that isn’t news and I’m not interested in keep churning it over It is OAFC’s liability which Lemmy took on when he purchased the limited company. The charge was on the accounts long before Abdallah got involved so to try and claim Corney hid it from him is ridiculous, all of the fans were aware of it. Edited July 31, 2019 by Ryan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Being picky but the Head Coach is generally expected to follow the broad tactical approach in many variations of the DoF model. Southampton a good example where the are always looking for replacements and development players who will fit with how they play. This includes the head coach though, which explains why Colin never pitched up there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 19 minutes ago, League one forever said: Spot on. According to BB80 though he stopped interfering after Scholes left. A whopping 9 games. And Iacovetti came straight in and Hunt went straight out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 minute ago, Ryan said: It is OAFC’s liability which Lemmy took on when he purchased the limited company. The charge was on the accounts long before Abdallah got involved so to try and claim Corney his it from him is ridiculous, all of the fans were aware of it. IIRC the charges were about the last things holding up the finalisation of the sale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 5 minutes ago, leeslover said: IIRC the charges were about the last things holding up the finalisation of the sale If it really is outstanding rather than just not removed at Companies House I dread to think how much interest is racking up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 20 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: If it really is outstanding rather than just not removed at Companies House I dread to think how much interest is racking up True. Also sort of makes me wonder if we've solved the question of who finds the #Englishlads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostofcecere Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, yarddog73 said: He wouldn't get away with not paying rent at the AJ Bell..... This... and I dare say the cost of renting BP is cheaper than he’d have to pay there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 11 hours ago, Fanny Adams said: We all like a good moan, but fuck me Lags you need to lighten up What you on about? Do me a favour and move on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowenicki Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 36 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: If it really is outstanding rather than just not removed at Companies House I dread to think how much interest is racking up What is this floating charge secured against? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Just now, kowenicki said: What is this floating charge secured against? Don't know, just registered as a charge. That detail not available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowenicki Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Just now, Dave_Og said: Don't know, just registered as a charge. That detail not available. Odd. 2004 has nowt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 minute ago, kowenicki said: Odd. 2004 has nowt. It's not my area but I think it can just be registered to give preferential creditor status rather than against specific assets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 I was given to understand it was against the club, which as Kow says would be odd as it's worthless. I don't think that the arrangement with the undercover football agents and friends of Stephen Vaughan was ever straightforward though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, deyres42 said: A whopping 9 games. And Iacovetti came straight in and Hunt went straight out... ...and then kept three consecutive clean sheets. And scored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts