oafc1955 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Stuart James on Twitter: "James Tarkowski set to have medical at Burnley tomorrow after £3m fee agreed with Brentford (Fulham offered £1m more in the summer)." If true £530k coming our way!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Stuart James on Twitter: "James Tarkowski set to have medical at Burnley tomorrow after £3m fee agreed with Brentford (Fulham offered £1m more in the summer)." If true £530k coming our way!!! Posted 25 January 2016 - 04:01 PM Even if he does move let's not get too giddy with the money. The omniscient MilnrowLatics has checked on sell-on fees. In such a case then the club who initially sold the player gets paid first. So if it's 20% of £1million , for example, then that club would get the first £200,000 - if the fee was paid in a single transaction . If however it was paid in 4 instalments (and phased payment is quite common) , then first club would get 20% of each instalment of £250,000 per year, so £50,000. That could be seen to be better in that the first club has a guaranteed income over years, but the initial windfall would be much less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simoncorneyisgod Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Tarky's move is definitely gathering momentum with Talk:censored:e reporting they have agreed a fee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishblue Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 08:39 TARKOWSKI MEDICAL Brentford defender James Tarkowski is having a medical at Burnley, according to the Football League Paper. The Lancashire club had an offer of £2.5m plus add-ons rejected for the centre-back earlier this month but it is believed he could be allowed to move for a fee of around £4m-£5m. Tarkowski is looking to move to the north of England for personal reasons. He has made 72 appearances for the Bees and his contract is set to expire at the end of next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) 08:39 TARKOWSKI MEDICAL Brentford defender James Tarkowski is having a medical at Burnley, according to the Football League Paper. The Lancashire club had an offer of £2.5m plus add-ons rejected for the centre-back earlier this month but it is believed he could be allowed to move for a fee of around £4m-£5m. Tarkowski is looking to move to the north of England for personal reasons. He has made 72 appearances for the Bees and his contract is set to expire at the end of next season. If they rejected £2.5m, and under his circumstances, I reckon £3m, £3.5m tops as said. Edited February 1, 2016 by singe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Deal agreed, subject to medical which will be done this morning, apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 But has Corney already cashed in his sell on clause? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losesome Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 But has Corney already cashed in his sell on clause? who could blame him if he did, after the Micah Richards fiasco when he supposedly turned down city's offer of £500k he may well have snatched their hand off . Although i would be surprised because upto a few weeks ago i don't think Brentford had any intentions to sell him!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just a forte Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 It's all over facebook and twitter we already accepted Cash from Brentford to Buy out the sell on clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wozzer Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 It's all over facebook and twitter we already accepted Cash from Brentford to Buy out the sell on clause. Facebook and Twitter. Must be true then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 As Brentford seemingly had no intention to sell him I doubt they'll have offered Corney anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 It's all over facebook and twitter we already accepted Cash from Brentford to Buy out the sell on clause. Some helmet on twitter KNOWS Ched Evans and his father in law are coming in to buy latics. Thats a twitter fact, it'll never happen mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmer1 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) As Brentford seemingly had no intention to sell him I doubt they'll have offered Corney anything. However they would be very aware of his value and it would have been in their best interest to buy the clause out in case they got an offer they couldnt turn down. If Corney has accepted money for the clause fair enough, who could blame him? Once bitten twice shy... That wont stop his haters exploding when the news breaks. Hopefully we profit nicely today Edited February 1, 2016 by palmer1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L1onheartNew Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Facebook and Twitter. Must be true then. Not until it gets in the Daily Mail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 However they would be very aware of his value and it would have been in their best interest to buy the clause out in case they got an offer they couldnt turn down. If Corney has accepted money for the clause fair enough, who could blame him? Once bitten twice shy... That wont stop his haters exploding when the news breaks. Hopefully we profit nicely today I doubt they have the budget to take such punts. Plus we know with latics something like that would have come out already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 It's all over facebook and twitter we already accepted Cash from Brentford to Buy out the sell on clause. Facebook, twitter, Chron......which is least wrong? http://www.oldham-chronicle.co.uk/news-features/10/oldham-athletic-news/96098/athletic-up-for-tarkowski-windfall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavageTheBeast Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) I highly doubt Brentford would have sold it or we would have even accepted it. Edited February 1, 2016 by SavageTheBeast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmer1 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 I doubt they have the budget to take such punts. Plus we know with latics something like that would have come out already. Championship club who sold a striker for nearly£10 million last season? they are doing ok and I doubt 400k or more likel less to buy out a clause will not break their bank. Im hoping they havent but it is well within their means Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Championship club who sold a striker for nearly£10 million last season? they are doing ok and I doubt 400k or more likel less to buy out a clause will not break their bank. Im hoping they havent but it is well within their means I just don't think clubs even on that level buy out clauses on a punt. Brentford were not planning on selling him. "Tarkys mam is dying, sell the bloody clause. Sell sell sell" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wozzer Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 I highly doubt we would have bought it out I think that's a fairly safe assumption. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robboman Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Can somebody tweet Matt chambers asking the question? I haven't got Twitter but he might know... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngen Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Of all the things going on at a football club in the Championship aiming for promotion to the Prem, do you think anyone has actually thought "quick we had best make Oldham an offer on a clause which we inserted a year or 2 ago, to save ourselves 50k in the long run"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckshawlatic Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) Not related to Tarky but Sky Sports reporting that Villa want 10 Million for Micah Richards from Sunderland..... Would be bloody typical for him to move for a fee now Edited February 1, 2016 by JWhite101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Not related to Tarky but Sky Sports reporting that Villa want 10 Million for Micah Richards from Sunderland..... Would be bloody typical for him to move for a fee nowAre Villa pissed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Of all the things going on at a football club in the Championship aiming for promotion to the Prem, do you think anyone has actually thought "quick we had best make Oldham an offer on a clause which we inserted a year or 2 ago, to save ourselves 50k in the long run"? More likely to be a case of us approaching them I would think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.