kowenicki Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 13 hours ago, pk200 said: Kowenicki is a Corney apologist and defender of the Board....don't trust him one iota. Yep. I’m under cover. Or... I just have a different opinion to you. “Defender of the board”. Aren’t the trust on the board? There should be be a minimum age limit in this board or at least a minimum IQ level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 36 minutes ago, OldHallam said: Son bought one in April 2016 in 18 days from start to keys in hand. Usual possibly 12 weeks ish. Why are we persisting with this house versus business argument? Two totally different processes, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whittles left foot Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Wardie said: Why are we persisting with this house versus business argument? Two totally different processes, surely? Think its my fault. I was trying to illustrate how long it takes to sell a house, so it would take even longer to sell a business undergoing due diligence in answer to some posters saying the process is taking too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, whittles left foot said: Think its my fault. I was trying to illustrate how long it takes to sell a house, so it would take even longer to sell a business undergoing due diligence in answer to some posters saying the process is taking too long. Ah. It's the old internet forum "Valid argument gets twisted around and thrown back in your face" response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowenicki Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 36 minutes ago, OldHallam said: lol I was answering a question about houses which had been asked. A business can take a very very long time no argument on that. Speaking from experience. Months and months. From initial discussions to heads and DD took 4 months and then DD to sale a further 4 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 4 hours ago, kowenicki said: “Defender of the board”. Aren’t the trust on the board? I might have to teach you something about Corporate Governance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowenicki Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 4 hours ago, leeslover said: I might have to teach you something about Corporate Governance I was answering a shitty comment in a flippant way. Don’t need any lessons ta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddySmoker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 4 hours ago, leeslover said: I might have to teach you something about Corporate Governance It seems that Kowenicki was struggling to get back on the board-having difficulty with his own IQ test perhaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 1 hour ago, kowenicki said: I was answering a shitty comment in a flippant way. Don’t need any lessons ta. Thanks. I'll remember the, "damned if they, damned if they don't," thing the next time you say something pissy about the Trust. It works both ways. For example, I knew wages hadn't been paid, you said it was bullshit, but if I had posted about it you'd have said I was spreading rumours with an agenda. You need to find a balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, leeslover said: Thanks. I'll remember the, "damned if they, damned if they don't," thing the next time you say something pissy about the Trust. It works both ways. For example, I knew wages hadn't been paid, you said it was bullshit, but if I had posted about it you'd have said I was spreading rumours with an agenda. You need to find a balance. Slam dunk! Well done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 8 hours ago, leeslover said: Thanks. I'll remember the, "damned if they, damned if they don't," thing the next time you say something pissy about the Trust. It works both ways. For example, I knew wages hadn't been paid, you said it was bullshit, but if I had posted about it you'd have said I was spreading rumours with an agenda. You need to find a balance. It's a fair point and quite ironic that the said poster jumps on any perceived negativity and doom mongerers yet clearly has his own agenda when it comes to discrediting the Trust and those whose opinions differ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boundaryblue80 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 On 07/10/2017 at 7:32 PM, kowenicki said: I don’t think everyone here understands how the ignore function works. Comradesmoker (the green eyed monster) certainly doesn’t. Obsessed. ? Brilliant You got all upset when I called you Comrade K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy-latic Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Gerards tweet implies the players still haven't been paid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozman Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 12 minutes ago, Andy-latic said: Gerards tweet implies the players still haven't been paid Or he could be saying that they've finally been paid 10 days late. It could be interpreted either way. I was told by a club employee that they are paid late a lot of the time but do always get their money and therefore manage their finances on the basis that they expect to be paid late. They believed that the difference this time was that matchday staff, who normally do get paid on time, were also not paid on payday and one of them went to the press with the story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joanna Roper Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 God this is painfully slow longest 2-week break of our life's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nohairdontcare Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 It's been a very long "weeks not months" - though the second the club said "weeks not months" I reckoned it would be months not weeks... I'd love a statement about the statement now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joanna Roper Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 11 minutes ago, Nohairdontcare said: It's been a very long "weeks not months" - though the second the club said "weeks not months" I reckoned it would be months not weeks... I'd love a statement about the statement now. Imagine been told its all gone tits up after all this time we cant be that lucky to have some rich owner and things go well for once can we :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 37 minutes ago, Joanna Roper said: Imagine been told its all gone tits up after all this time we cant be that lucky to have some rich owner and things go well for once can we :S We still do not know if it is a takeover or investment. Tits up? Ever heard of 'Self fulfilling prophecy'?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 5 hours ago, bozman said: Or he could be saying that they've finally been paid 10 days late. It could be interpreted either way. I was told by a club employee that they are paid late a lot of the time but do always get their money and therefore manage their finances on the basis that they expect to be paid late. They believed that the difference this time was that matchday staff, who normally do get paid on time, were also not paid on payday and one of them went to the press with the story. They shouldnt really have to put up with it though should they. Its a poor way to treat your staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozman Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 9 minutes ago, GlossopLatic said: They shouldnt really have to put up with it though should they. Its a poor way to treat your staff. No they shouldn't. I'm not defending it, just explaining that some staff have learnt to expect it and deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 The rumour I've heard is that the takeover or new investment is delayed or might not happen.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 8 minutes ago, singe said: The rumour I've heard is that the takeover or new investment is delayed or might not happen.... Heard the same thing, unfortunately. Wouldn't be a surprise though, would it? This is Oldham Athletic after all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 That rumour was set to circulate eventually whatever happened ....this is Latics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 If not stick with Richie Wellens, I think he'll take us higher anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Without investment this club is fu**** You can kiss good bye to Bryne & Doyle for a start! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.