MATCH: Solihull Moors (H) 28/08/23

[yarddog73]

2 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

That is a bit rich coming from you. I tried to get a straight answer out of you the other night about midfield players and you did everything but provide an answer. Traffic cone springs to mind.

Ask me again then, sorry my humour went over your head, I'll try to keep it on topic.

[disjointed]

17 minutes ago, yarddog73 said:

You are an apologist, I could accuse you of having an agenda given you've spent your time over the years attempting to defend a series of losers from Corney to Abdallah and David Dunn to David Unsworth, I have an opinion and can be impartial but I'm seeing nothing at all to suggest Unsworth is the man to take the club forward. Do you remember when you used to defend the rat Corney relentlessly even when he attempted to dig a few of us out who had the temerity to call him out for the cunt that he was.

 

I am as entitled as the next man to give my opinion, others who are defending Unsworth and trying to preach how we should react to him and be patient are no more entitled than I, there is objection to him - that is undeniable so as we don't live in North Korea I'll continue to post my feelings on a forum and say it as I see it.

Amen to that. 

[mcfluff1985]

27 minutes ago, yarddog73 said:

You are an apologist, I could accuse you of having an agenda given you've spent your time over the years attempting to defend a series of losers from Corney to Abdallah and David Dunn to David Unsworth, I have an opinion and can be impartial but I'm seeing nothing at all to suggest Unsworth is the man to take the club forward. Do you remember when you used to defend the rat Corney relentlessly even when he attempted to dig a few of us out who had the temerity to call him out for the cunt that he was.

 

I am as entitled as the next man to give my opinion, others who are defending Unsworth and trying to preach how we should react to him and be patient are no more entitled than I, there is objection to him - that is undeniable so as we don't live in North Korea I'll continue to post my feelings on a forum and say it as I see it.

 

9 minutes ago, disjointed said:

Amen to that. 

 

To start David Dunn was shite. Hated him. You'll not see me defending him.

 

At least Corney had us in league 1. He was right to call some of you gobshites out. None of you took up his offer if I remember rightly. 

 

[yarddog73]

1 minute ago, mcfluff1985 said:

 

 

To start David Dunn was shite. Hated him. You'll not see me defending him.

 

At least Corney had us in league 1. He was right to call some of you gobshites out. None of you took up his offer if I remember rightly. 

 

I wouldn't give him the steam off my shit never mind my time, I'll give you he did have us in League 1 and I'd give him something else Unsworth would be out the door by now with him because for all his faults he knew when a manager had to go.

[mcfluff1985]

3 minutes ago, yarddog73 said:

I wouldn't give him the steam off my shit never mind my time, I'll give you he did have us in League 1 and I'd give him something else Unsworth would be out the door by now with him because for all his faults he knew when a manager had to go.

And a load of you pushed for him to go. That's worked out well for us

[mcfluff1985]

39 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

That is a bit rich coming from you. I tried to get a straight answer out of you the other night about midfield players and you did everything but provide an answer. Traffic cone springs to mind.

 

I bet there isn't a Latics fan on here who can remember him playing against us last year. He even scored.

Not sure how you attributed that comment to me

[whittles left foot]

2 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Not sure how you attributed that comment to me

I didn't it was to @yarddog73 as he acknowledges above but calls it his humour.

[oafc1955]

57 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Saying maybe he's getting up to speed and isn't quite the finished article that everyone made out. Still a big step up from the below division

What, you mean like Harry Vaughan who at 19 has moved up 3 divisions and is more than holding his own in the Championship.
It’s not such a big step up at all and he’s hardly been bought for the future either, he’s not a youngster, he’s 26!!

[mcfluff1985]

5 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

What, you mean like Harry Vaughan who at 19 has moved up 3 divisions and is more than holding his own in the Championship.
It’s not such a big step up at all and he’s hardly been bought for the future either, he’s not a youngster, he’s 26!!

Sorry. You know more than the coaching team. Noted

[disjointed]

30 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

 

 

To start David Dunn was shite. Hated him. You'll not see me defending him.

 

At least Corney had us in league 1. He was right to call some of you gobshites out. None of you took up his offer if I remember rightly. 

 

Gobshites? Nice, got to love constructive criticism. 

[mcfluff1985]

1 minute ago, disjointed said:

Gobshites? Nice, got to love constructive criticism. 

Some people are gobshites. It's just a fact

[oafc1955]

8 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Sorry. You know more than the coaching team. Noted

WTF you on about?

[mcfluff1985]

1 minute ago, oafc1955 said:

WTF you on about?

Saying its not such a big step up. Comparing the situation to Vaughan. I'm more confident in trusting the coaches on him not starting than listening to the people on here who for no reason other than he scored goals at a lower level think he was some wonderkid and should start every game

[TheBigDog]

1 hour ago, mcfluff1985 said:

The same Willoughby people were saying DU should be sacked for not starting. Now he's not good enough. Maybe DU knows more than the people on here. Shock

 

1 hour ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Saying maybe he's getting up to speed and isn't quite the finished article that everyone made out. Still a big step up from the below division

He’s not good enough yet then

[League one forever]

27 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Sorry. You know more than the coaching team. Noted

This isn’t a DU point. 
 

Just think about what you’re saying, and take the emotion out of it. 
 

There isn’t a single argument that says a player isn’t good for level 5 but is good enough for level 2. 

[oafc1955]

7 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Saying it’s not such a big step up. Comparing the situation to Vaughan. I'm more confident in trusting the coaches on him not starting than listening to the people on here who for no reason other than he scored goals at a lower level think he was some wonderkid and should start every game

Do you not remember him saying he was only bringing in players that would improve the team?

In our position, if you’re chasing a player for months and end up paying a fee it’s surely with the intention of putting him in the starting line up.

When Lundstram and Ward are fit he’ll probably be even further down the pecking order.

A pointless signing in my book!!

 

[mcfluff1985]

5 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

Do you not remember him saying he was only bringing in players that would improve the team?

In our position, if you’re chasing a player for months and end up paying a fee it’s surely with the intention of putting him in the starting line up.

When Lundstram and Ward are fit he’ll probably be even further down the pecking order.

A pointless signing in my book!!

 

Oh sorry. We should only sign players who are immediate starters. Maybe he sees him being used more as the season goes on. 

[mcfluff1985]

13 minutes ago, TheBigDog said:

 

He’s not good enough yet then

Who knows. Not seen enough coaches have though. @yarddog73was saying he should be starting and it was a travesty he wasnt. Now hes saying he shouldnt be in the starting line up. Seems hes found some common ground with DU

[oafc1955]

5 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

We should only sign players who are immediate starters.

That’s more or less what Unsworth said!

[mcfluff1985]

7 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

That’s more or less what Unsworth said!

You quoted DU as players improving the team. Not the starting 11

[Boyyou]

8 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

That’s more or less what Unsworth said!

Just to clarify,  we didn't pay a fee for Willoughby. He was at the end of his contract.

[oafc1955]

5 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

You quoted DU as players improving the team. Not the starting 11

Yes I did….the team is the starting 11 at kick off as opposed to the ‘squad’

[mcfluff1985]

5 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

Yes I did….the team is the starting 11 at kick off as opposed to the ‘squad’

Is it? I'd say the oldham athletic team encompasses the first team squad. Semantics

 

 

[redlion]

13 hours ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Is it? I'd say the oldham athletic team encompasses the first team squad. Semantics

 

 

@mcfluff1985 you are constantly attempting to engage in a battle of wits but you are obviously unarmed. You are just embarrassing yourself.

[LaticsPete]

21 minutes ago, redlion said:

@mcfluff1985 you are constantly attempting to engage in a battle of wits but you are obviously unarmed. You are just embarrassing yourself.

Is this really what OWTB has become?