Jump to content

January transfer window


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, josh_latics said:

Edmundson made a big impression at Fylde. 

I predict he will go back for  the rest of the season or maybe a league two side. He will then be ready for us and to kick on next season as an integral part of our team. That’s what I hope anyway. Always like to see one of our own come good. I’m loving seeing Tarky progress whether we got the best deal financially  or not. 

Whats happened to young Stott BTW ?

Edited by simplythemostimportantkick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, simplythemostimportantkick said:

I predict he will go back for  the rest of the season or maybe a league two side. He will then be ready for us and to kick on next season as an integral part of our team. That’s what I hope anyway. Always like to see one of our own come good. I’m loving seeing Tarky progress whether we got the best deal financially  or not. 

Whats happened to young Stott BTW ?

 

Stott came back from Curzon this week as well. No idea how he got on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it be too much to ask for posters saying any of the following:

  • i have been told
  • i have heard
  • rumours say
  • I have  read 
  • i believe

to state the source from which they have come to this conclusion?

in fact if they don't couldn't the post just be blocked?

thank you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, astottie said:

Would it be too much to ask for posters saying any of the following:

  • i have been told
  • i have heard
  • rumours say
  • I have  read 
  • i believe

to state the source from which they have come to this conclusion?

in fact if they don't couldn't the post just be blocked?

thank you?

Whilst I appreciate the meaning behind this it is impractical. Lots of people “in the know” don’t want to name their source as it risks them not being told anything in the future, and could potentially risk the job of the source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rudemedic said:

Whilst I appreciate the meaning behind this it is impractical. Lots of people “in the know” don’t want to name their source as it risks them not being told anything in the future, and could potentially risk the job of the source.

Maybe they should just be asked whether they are knowingly talking bollocks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, astottie said:

Would it be too much to ask for posters saying any of the following:

  • i have been told
  • i have heard
  • rumours say
  • I have  read 
  • i believe

to state the source from which they have come to this conclusion?

in fact if they don't couldn't the post just be blocked?

thank you?

I did the other day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...