Jump to content

Junior Luamba


Recommended Posts

As he's one of our youth products, one of our own, I find it disgusting the way we've treated him.

 

He had, still has, plenty of potential. Hasn't worked out for him, really shame really.

 

We've no intention of keeping him apparently, I believe our offer is around the same as his deal signed last time, straight off a youth. This then traps him as any club signing him owes compo. Unless there has been an update I've missed that still remains.

 

Poor form from us IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Shrek said:

As he's one of our youth products, one of our own, I find it disgusting the way we've treated him.

 

He had, still has, plenty of potential. Hasn't worked out for him, really shame really.

 

We've no intention of keeping him apparently, I believe our offer is around the same as his deal signed last time, straight off a youth. This then traps him as any club signing him owes compo. Unless there has been an update I've missed that still remains.

 

Poor form from us IMO.

Wasn't he on trial at Barnsley? If they'd picked him up for nothing because we hadn't offered a contract (as I believe happened with Simms) then the club will have got pelters for missing out.

 

Has he had offers/interest from clubs lower down the pyramid who can't afford the compensation so take it no further?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Shrek said:

As he's one of our youth products, one of our own, I find it disgusting the way we've treated him.

 

He had, still has, plenty of potential. Hasn't worked out for him, really shame really.

 

We've no intention of keeping him apparently, I believe our offer is around the same as his deal signed last time, straight off a youth. This then traps him as any club signing him owes compo. Unless there has been an update I've missed that still remains.

 

Poor form from us IMO.

Standard practice surely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LaticsPete said:

He wasn’t good enough but we offered him a new contract . He turned it down. How is that treating him badly?

 

We offered him a contract the same level as his post youth one. Peanuts, it meant we were due compo. We don't actually want him to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shrek said:

As he's one of our youth products, one of our own, I find it disgusting the way we've treated him.

 

He had, still has, plenty of potential. Hasn't worked out for him, really shame really.

 

We've no intention of keeping him apparently, I believe our offer is around the same as his deal signed last time, straight off a youth. This then traps him as any club signing him owes compo. Unless there has been an update I've missed that still remains.

 

Poor form from us IMO.

He was offered a deal on the same money and turned it down. He hadn’t shown much to warrant anything more in my opinion.

 

Nothing wrong with that is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TheBigDog said:

He was offered a deal on the same money and turned it down. He hadn’t shown much to warrant anything more in my opinion.

 

Nothing wrong with that is there?

 

The intentions behind it are a little different. It wasn't an offer the club felt he would accept or indeed i believe wanted him to accept.

 

It's the same wage as his initial pro deal. That will be a pittance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shrek said:

 

The intentions behind it are a little different. It wasn't an offer the club felt he would accept or indeed i believe wanted him to accept.

 

It's the same wage as his initial pro deal. That will be a pittance.

Is the potential compensation we'd be due stopping him getting another club?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shrek said:

 

The intentions behind it are a little different. It wasn't an offer the club felt he would accept or indeed i believe wanted him to accept.

 

It's the same wage as his initial pro deal. That will be a pittance.

 

It's all the club had to offer or indeed what Junior warranted. It's pro football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Shrek said:

 

The intentions behind it are a little different. It wasn't an offer the club felt he would accept or indeed i believe wanted him to accept.

 

It's the same wage as his initial pro deal. That will be a pittance.

IT'S BECAUSE HE WASNT GOOD ENOUGH FFS!!

What is it your moaning about😬

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shrek said:

 

Someone has worked it out.

 

20 year old kid. Poor in my view. 

I meant has it actually happened? Another club wants to actually sign him but can't because of the compensation? Or are you theorising?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Shrek said:

 

Someone has worked it out.

 

20 year old kid. Poor in my view. 

 

We've invested in his potential.  If someone else gets the benefit then us being compensated it seems fair to me.  It's not as if we're demanding a massive transfer fee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Shrek said:

As he's one of our youth products, one of our own, I find it disgusting the way we've treated him.

 

He had, still has, plenty of potential. Hasn't worked out for him, really shame really.

 

We've no intention of keeping him apparently, I believe our offer is around the same as his deal signed last time, straight off a youth. This then traps him as any club signing him owes compo. Unless there has been an update I've missed that still remains.

 

Poor form from us IMO.

 

2 hours ago, Shrek said:

 

The intentions behind it are a little different. It wasn't an offer the club felt he would accept or indeed i believe wanted him to accept.

 

It's the same wage as his initial pro deal. That will be a pittance.

 

Good business. Pipe down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shrek said:

 

The intentions behind it are a little different. It wasn't an offer the club felt he would accept or indeed i believe wanted him to accept.

 

It's the same wage as his initial pro deal. That will be a pittance.

You are assuming a lot there about what intentions were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...