Jump to content

Non payment of transfer fees


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, adamoafc said:

Abdallah will have received more money over the last year from Business Interuption insurance, EFL loan, EFL grant, EFL regular payments, Furlough payments and season ticket sales than he probably ever has whilst owner. 

 

Not really fair to count loans as income though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
15 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

Not ideal but if it is a case of another club not getting their 10, 20 grand meaning our own staff get paid I'm prepared to accept it.

 

If it is a case that they see no benefit in paying transfer fees as we can't sign anyone anyway, that would be less good.

 

There are no positives in there at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

Money is always tight at this time of the year and will be even tighter with the number of people not attending, we can't sign anyone anyway so not worth getting knickers in a twist over.

Reminiscent of Captain Smith and the Titanic.

 

Always icebergs about at this time of the year, don't panic. Full steam ahead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GlossopLatic said:

 

What about loan fees?

 

Credit where its due I think the club had gone nearly 2 weeks without a shitstorm.

 

If anyone tech savvy could create an "Oldham Athletic: Days without Crisis" sign on here I'd be very grateful.

 

Although realistically you could leave it at 0 days for most of the time and you'd be up to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

There aren't but it does raise an interesting point about whether those choosing not to attend should be complaining about bills not being paid...

Bills weren’t being paid before protests Rob but don’t let that get in the way of a good post 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

There aren't but it does raise an interesting point about whether those choosing not to attend should be complaining about bills not being paid...

Not really.  It has been chaos since day one.  If he wants people to attend so that he can pay the bills then he needs to demonstrate some ability/intention to run the club professionally.  It's not a lot to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adamoafc said:

Abdallah will have received more money over the last year from Business Interuption insurance, EFL loan, EFL grant, EFL regular payments, Furlough payments and season ticket sales than he probably ever has whilst owner. 

They wouldn't have made use of the furlough scheme in the past 12 months. They have been playing football throughout that period and therefore wouldn't have been able to claim anything from the business interuption insurance. Efl regular payments are as you say regular so nothing over what will have been budgeted for. The loan is a loan that is repaid out of the solidarity payments so it's just the EFL grant which wasn't that much. No support last season, vastly reduced support this season and reduced season ticket prices means the club have very little income for a long period. Not sure where you get the club have had a lot more income recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PeteG said:

They wouldn't have made use of the furlough scheme in the past 12 months. They have been playing football throughout that period and therefore wouldn't have been able to claim anything from the business interuption insurance. Efl regular payments are as you say regular so nothing over what will have been budgeted for. The loan is a loan that is repaid out of the solidarity payments so it's just the EFL grant which wasn't that much. No support last season, vastly reduced support this season and reduced season ticket prices means the club have very little income for a long period. Not sure where you get the club have had a lot more income recently.

Agreed, although they may have had BII payments as clearly business has been interrupted even if football has been played.  That would require that they have identified a quality policy and paid the premiums though.  Confident?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adamoafc said:

Abdallah will have received more money over the last year from Business Interuption insurance, EFL loan, EFL grant, EFL regular payments, Furlough payments and season ticket sales than he probably ever has whilst owner. 

Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, PeteG said:

They wouldn't have made use of the furlough scheme in the past 12 months. They have been playing football throughout that period and therefore wouldn't have been able to claim anything from the business interuption insurance. Efl regular payments are as you say regular so nothing over what will have been budgeted for. The loan is a loan that is repaid out of the solidarity payments so it's just the EFL grant which wasn't that much. No support last season, vastly reduced support this season and reduced season ticket prices means the club have very little income for a long period. Not sure where you get the club have had a lot more income recently.

Football year Pete. Business interruption would cover it and a number of clubs have utilised this. Fans not being in the ground, money from match day hospitality, food drink etc would all be covered. Covid regulations were still in place for the friendlies this season so could have been claimed again. 
 

The point about furlough was that the club didn’t have to find the wages and still received money via season ticket sales/ sponsorships etc so haven’t lost out. 
 

EFL grant was above into 6 figures (just under £250k), the loan was mid 6 figures and still income which can be used, whether it’s paid back now or later. 
 

Add to that the George Edmundson money the club claim we received a five figure sum for this. 
 

I would suggest the club has done a lot better than you make out Pete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LaticMark said:

 

Under the transfer embargo because of the EFL loan, the club is not allowed to pay loan fees!

That doesn't stop the club these days. Two players signed on two year contracts when not allowed comes to mind.

 

They are not receiving the EFL solidarity payments now because these are used to repay the loan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, adamoafc said:

Football year Pete. Business interruption would cover it and a number of clubs have utilised this. Fans not being in the ground, money from match day hospitality, food drink etc would all be covered. Covid regulations were still in place for the friendlies this season so could have been claimed again. 
 

The point about furlough was that the club didn’t have to find the wages and still received money via season ticket sales/ sponsorships etc so haven’t lost out. 
 

EFL grant was above into 6 figures (just under £250k), the loan was mid 6 figures and still income which can be used, whether it’s paid back now or later. 
 

Add to that the George Edmundson money the club claim we received a five figure sum for this. 
 

I would suggest the club has done a lot better than you make out Pete. 

Yet you stated on the podcast that the club is insolvent and not worth any potential investors paying anything for. Which one is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PeteG said:

Yet you stated on the podcast that the club is insolvent and not worth any potential investors paying anything for. Which one is it?

Have you checked the clubs accounts recently? Last time I checked it was a hefty 7 figure debt Pete. That isn’t a regular income, you couldn’t get a loan off the bank on the back of it, but a one off so yes still insolvent. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, adamoafc said:

Have you checked the clubs accounts recently? Last time I checked it was a hefty 7 figure debt Pete. That isn’t a regular income, you couldn’t get a loan off the bank on the back of it, but a one off so yes still insolvent. 
 

I have and it's not good, but, then it wasn't me suggesting that income was higher in the last year than it had been in any of the previous 3 was it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adamoafc said:

Have you checked the clubs accounts recently? Last time I checked it was a hefty 7 figure debt Pete. That isn’t a regular income, you couldn’t get a loan off the bank on the back of it, but a one off so yes still insolvent. 
 

 

Makes me wonder Adam if AL pumped in £5 million why didn't he put another million or 2 to make sure the club wouldn't be in this situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Matt changed the title to Non payment of transfer fees
16 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

We'll boycott the club to strangle the supply of cash then we'll moan the bills aren't paid. Good logic


The bills haven’t been paid for years - our esteemed leader stated season ticket sales are a bonus income not budgeted for 

 

his latest statement to the BBC says he has worked hard to make the club financially stable and secure - it isn't 

 

but keep talking bollocks it at least keeps things fresh 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chaddyexile84 said:


The bills haven’t been paid for years - our esteemed leader stated season ticket sales are a bonus income not budgeted for 

 

his latest statement to the BBC says he has worked hard to make the club financially stable and secure - it isn't 

 

but keep talking bollocks it at least keeps things fresh 

Most of the bills must have paid or else the club wouldn't still be in business...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mcfluff1985 said:

We'll boycott the club to strangle the supply of cash then we'll moan the bills aren't paid. Good logic

 

Or alternatively we will treat our paying customers like shit our sponsors like shit and then wonder why they walk away and we can't pay the bills. Good Logic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...