bigfatjoe1 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 ..have i read this right. He's coming back on loan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4froale Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 if its as low a fee as being speculated then I don't wee why we couldn't of kept hold of him till summer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjk2008 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 well thats me not going again this season 30 games for what ?? no ambition and clueless feel like a mug again. If that's your attitude then good. :censored: off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Hope so!! But is it the club telling Matt "its a lot more" . We will still be selling on the cheap. Just look at the replacments we have signed today, Non league players and a Bristol city reserve. Ok £150k may be incorrect but the fact it is being quoted in the first place just goes to show how low the value is...... Or Brentford are boasting to their local rag that they've done a great deal.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4froale Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Brentford have completed the signing of central defender James Tarkowski from Oldham Athletic for an undisclosed fee. The 21-year-old has signed on at Griffin Park until the summer of 2017. As part of the deal, James will return to Oldham on loan when the loan window reopens next Saturday, February 8. Read more at http://www.brentfordfc.co.uk/news/article/james-tarkowski-31.01.14-1330159.aspx#JIcLwSXRVjYRJgAu.99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 your welcome its why the crowds go down week on week bunch of jokers robbing the fans worst ground in the league and replacing our best players with :censored:e, been 27 year week in week out but thats enough for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fruitygoo Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 (edited) Im witholding all comment on movements until 10pm....but i fear when i do, it could be a serious rant Edited January 31, 2014 by Fruitygoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngen Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Official says he will join back when loan window opens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrown23 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 don't really know what the point of loaning him back for a month is, would rather we saved that loan for a striker or in case we get hit with injuries Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyleArmy1994 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 For someone who has to work extra hours just to make it to watch latics, I feel a mug knowing Baxter and Tarky left within 6 months of each other. Will still follow us, support us and cheer the lads on as normal but I feel hurt that we've flogged him and hurt that its to a league 1 side. What ever the fee, I think we could of held out till summer, much rather see him go then! Either way, best of luck james, must say its been great witnessing your development. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldhamoafc Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Really don't understand loaning him back for a month? End of season fair enough. Sell him and move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfatjoe1 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 It seems a bit convoluted. Why not just sign an agreement that he'll join in the summer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross2509 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Surley he's signing for a month because then it covers us when we are trying to sign a proper replacement either on loan or a free agent. Because those windows are normally open for a month longer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stargazer Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 I can only imagine the crowd response if Tarks makes any blunders or has a bad game......... This looks like a very poor management decision imo. The deals so far are dreadfully disappointing .........I imagine it is to finance a top notch goalscorer who will sign just before the deadilne ......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WIZZO83 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 OAFC you have become a total joke! Now someone tell me that Simon Corney has the best interests of Latics at heart??? He is bleeding this club dry!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WIZZO83 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 don't really know what the point of loaning him back for a month is, would rather we saved that loan for a striker or in case we get hit with injuries Is the max loan in the next window 3 months??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 They come. They go. Life continues. Latics survive. The fee is much more than his value a year ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavageTheBeast Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 shut the club down 150k is a joke and we are hiding this by saying undisclosed. We expected 500k at least. Why was the need to panic he was still under contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics and England Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Don't understand this from either our viewpoint or Brentford's. They are going up this season. If they are loaning him back to us, that means they do not currently have a starting spot for him. If they haven't got one now in League 1 they certainly aren't going to have one for him in the Championship. He's gone so we need to move on. We should have had a replacement lined up to replace him, not try and replace him with himself to then need to find a replacement in the next month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrown23 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Is the max loan in the next window 3 months??? not quite sure how it works to be honest, i think theres a limit to how many short term loans you can have [going off Football Manager so could be wrong] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Don't understand the loaning him back part of the deal. surely James Wilson's his replacement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluehobbit Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 that just looks wrong f******* brentford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WIZZO83 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 They come. They go. Life continues. Latics survive. The fee is much more than his value a year ago. we carry on like this and we wont have a club!! LJ talks about having players who will be here not only for this season but working towards next season!! Now we have 4 loan players in our starting 11 and another on the bench.....JOKE Our club will be the next stockport county under SC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmer1 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 he was bound to leave, im not disapointed at that. Im annoyed that it is again our best player going to another club in our division, we had a contract and we could have said thay can have him in the summer when as expected they go up. The fee is just rumours so we wait and see but if he goes he should go, no loan because it cant do him any good especially with our fans who will turn at the smallest thing. I just hope that we have a "big" signing lined up before 11pm because SC is to come in for some serious abuse from some if not. as always we move on and some will preach the end is nigh/..... its not the end of the world but I am disapointed with this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Really, really disappointed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.