Blu-Blood Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Hey, players are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them, remember? If that's all anyone was willing to pay, we might as well take a chance on him getting even better and someone else offering more in the summer! He is 21 years old. Suppose £150k is massive for us because we've not really had any lucrative cup runs or tv appearances for ages.....oh wait.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueatheart Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 really someones pulling my pisser arnt they Depends on the add-ons. 20% sell-on clause. £50k if he plays 50 games. £20k if they get promoted. Could be anything... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAC0AFC Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 if rather him see his contract out then go for that amount, what an absolute joke... does it poin to how much we must be struggling financially to accept that???? or am i just thinking of all the possible negatives, this is a joke right?? 150k???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Matt Chambers @Matt_Chambers_ 1m Reliably informed the fee for Tarkowski is way more than 150k. #oafc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
away dayz Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Matt chambers tweeting it's a lot more than the £150,000 quoted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Anyone out there still think Koukash was a bad idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross2509 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Surely this fee can't be true, come on now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross2509 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 And as i type that my suspicions are confirmed, thank :censored: for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrown23 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 wasn't their original bid 300k plus add ons/ can't see that 150k figure being true dont believe everything you read in the papers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
away dayz Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 He's gone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTM Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross2509 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Don't know how to put tweets in here but Oddschanger who are 100% reliable just tweeted he has gone to Brentford, out of all the clubs in for him i never would have thought he would have chosen to go there. Burnley was my favourite, ah well good move for him, good luck to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EASTLEY Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Being able to quote then edit tweets is a magical thing... What isn't fishing is that Brentford are after a Wycombe defender. Maybe it's a reaction after not landing Tarky. One can dream. That is 100% true but trying to get him on the cheap(the Wycombe defender, Wycombe not budging) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slystallone Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 £150K? Really? Wow. Just that. Wow. So - is he just not as good as we all think he is, do club's take us for a soft touch and bid low, are we that desperate for money; no matter how small it's perceived to be.....the truth is out there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfatjoe1 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 I've probably missed something over the last couple of years, but where have Brentford got all this money from? They've offered us and, i suspect Tarky, more than Burnley. They've been attracting a better quality of player for a couple of years. How? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 joke club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoney Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 (edited) Two of the best players sold within 6 months? - would really like some one from the club to explain this as well as explaining the long term strategy - been in this league ages and am being to think I will be collecting my pension before we promoted again - surely the idea is to keep the best players and build a sucessful team - not sure I understand it any more? Edited January 31, 2014 by Stoney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4froale Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 ahh well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshOWTB Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Gone then! Hope we got a better fee than reported Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Just so disappointing but predictable that so many accept that the £150k figure is accurate. Many of same people have in the past criticised SC for being a money grabber. If he is he'll try and maximise income - and surely people recognise he's not here for the short term and he's not conducting a fire sale? Nobody outside the club knows the full discussions about Tarky and any transfer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 well thats me not going again this season 30 games for what ?? no ambition and clueless feel like a mug again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross2509 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Some people are saying it is 150k and some are saying its a lot more, confusing... Like the Baxter fee saga all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIKI1234 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Matt chambers tweeting it's a lot more than the £150,000 quoted Hope so!! But is it the club telling Matt "its a lot more" . We will still be selling on the cheap. Just look at the replacments we have signed today, Non league players and a Bristol city reserve. Ok £150k may be incorrect but the fact it is being quoted in the first place just goes to show how low the value is...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slystallone Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 ....and back to us on loan once the window opens? really? Queue the shouts of 'he doesn't give a :censored:, he's not our player' then..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 All the best James Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.