Magic Mikey Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, OLDHAMADE said: The E.U has changed beyond recognition, it's now being run by 2 countries One we saved and the other we defeated, neither should be allowed to be in control of the other 26 nations. On Scotland, can we also have a vote? going to be a real shocker when they leave both the European union and the united kingdom, we'll ofcourse have to slam up a solid border to keep out, all the kilted marauders sick of surviving on oatcakes and whisky Not sure you had any credibility before this post. You certainly don't now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLDHAMADE Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, Magic Mikey said: Not sure you had any credibility before this post. You certainly don't now. Who gives a monkey's about credibility? cornering the world market are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mikey Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 10 minutes ago, OLDHAMADE said: Who gives a monkey's about credibility? cornering the world market are you? You've lost me. But a meandering stream of disconnected, nonsensical bollocks can be challenging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLDHAMADE Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Magic Mikey said: You've lost me. But a meandering stream of disconnected, nonsensical bollocks can be challenging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 3 hours ago, OLDHAMADE said: The E.U has changed beyond recognition, it's now being run by 2 countries One we saved and the other we defeated, neither should be allowed to be in control of the other 26 nations. On Scotland, can we also have a vote? going to be a real shocker when they leave both the European union and the united kingdom, we'll ofcourse have to slam up a solid border to keep out, all the kilted marauders sick of surviving on oatcakes and whisky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Right. Enough. This is a football forum. Isn’t it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLDHAMADE Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 30 minutes ago, GlossopLatic said: Hahahahaha think you get the drift, the Shuckster is back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12044222/paul-scholes-ordered-to-pay-oldham-after-losing-contractual-dispute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticMark Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, TheBigDog said: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12044222/paul-scholes-ordered-to-pay-oldham-after-losing-contractual-dispute Including: "But Oldham have won a case for breach of contract, with an arbitrator ruling Scholes did have complete control over team selection during his time as manager at Boundary Park." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaddyexile84 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, LaticMark said: Including: "But Oldham have won a case for breach of contract, with an arbitrator ruling Scholes did have complete control over team selection during his time as manager at Boundary Park." wont be the first time a court has got something wrong - guess it’s a hard one to prove really. Scholes said he interfered AL says he didn’t - I know which one I’m inclined to believe based on every other ex manager and player saying the same. good win for AL though - got some pennies towards his stadium bid now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticMark Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Chaddyexile84 said: wont be the first time a court has got something wrong - guess it’s a hard one to prove really. Scholes said he interfered AL says he didn’t - I know which one I’m inclined to believe based on every other ex manager and player saying the same. good win for AL though - got some pennies towards his stadium bid now " . . a significant five figure sum." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 I'm staggered to be honest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 I’m surprised but the point of independent arbitration is to arrive at an independent assement of the evidence. AL will feel justified with his approach, for better or worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannyboy55555 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Struggling to believe they got this right!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Sinnott Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 The court has made its decision so that's that. But wasn't one of the reasons given by the Daily Mail that they had already agreed to sign Iacovitti on a 2 year deal. Then, lo and behold, he signed a 2 year deal that summer after an ordinary (at best) loan spell. Probably just a coincidence though. Scholes is having an absolutely torrid time at the moment ain't he...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzlatic Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Might be worth considering who had the burden of proof. If Scholes had to prove interference but couldn't, or if AL had to prove no interference and could? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 36 minutes ago, Dave_Og said: I'm staggered to be honest Bang goes any further chance of getting a Salford player on loan... good job we signed Pidge last week! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, nzlatic said: Might be worth considering who had the burden of proof. If Scholes had to prove interference but couldn't, or if AL had to prove no interference and could? He did pick the team in question though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 So we have some funds then after legal costs....was it Brandsmiths, would be nice if they would consider waivering their fee and investing in the club So, just for fun what would be on the five figure fans wish list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Just now, underdog said: So, just for fun what would be on the five figure fans wish list? Open the North Stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 27 minutes ago, Lee Sinnott said: The court has made its decision so that's that. But wasn't one of the reasons given by the Daily Mail that they had already agreed to sign Iacovitti on a 2 year deal. Then, lo and behold, he signed a 2 year deal that summer after an ordinary (at best) loan spell. Probably just a coincidence though. Scholes is having an absolutely torrid time at the moment ain't Most new managers inherit players, they have to make the best of it. Happens in workplaces too. In these days where agents call the tune I'd say very few managers get to bring in players they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Just now, TheBigDog said: Open the North Stand. I was about to edit a list and include that...resolve safety issues in JR stand and get it open Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, BP1960 said: He did pick the team in question though. Stronger than some of the other patsys we've had at the helm then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc 123 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 21 minutes ago, BP1960 said: He did pick the team in question though. On his interview on BT Sports, he didn't say the owner picked the team but gave subtle hints who to play. He said the last match he was in charge he was told he wasn't allowed to play a particular player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Chaddyexile84 said: wont be the first time a court has got something wrong - guess it’s a hard one to prove really. Scholes said he interfered AL says he didn’t - I know which one I’m inclined to believe based on every other ex manager and player saying the same. good win for AL though - got some pennies towards his stadium bid now It's an arbitrator rather than a court. Very different process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.