Jump to content

Playing Squad - Summer 23


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, LightDN123 said:

ST saying they are looking to get McGahey out on loan to get match fit for us. Considering Raglan can’t get in the squad consistently I hope have no idea why we need this lump. 

He's as fit as I've ever seen him to be fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, diggleblue said:

There will be some fun had with this revelation.

Sutton being asked to a job on £330 pw. 
 

The mental gymnastics going on inside players' heads when somebody on the pitch is on double or triple your own wages and your perception is that they ain't doing enough or as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wardie said:

Sutton being asked to a job on £330 pw.

You surely don’t believe that to be true, that’s below the minimum wage….I have also been told from a usually reliable source that Norwood’s wage exceeds £4K a week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oafc1955 said:

You surely don’t believe that to be true, that’s below the minimum wage….I have also been told from a usually reliable source that Norwood’s wage exceeds £4K a week!

Thing is, who do we believe...the site's "Reliable sources" or yours?

It would beggar belief for Sutton to be on that and be on the same pitch as Nuttall, for example and if players see this and believe it, then I can fully understand how issues [grudges] would arise and affect performances. Too much info is a dangerous thing, especially if it is unreliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Looking at positions that's been lifted from football manager

Could be but once something is out there, then it's out there and open to interpretation. Slightly OT but I wonder how much this message board is viewed by club and players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like it's any surprise though, is it? Disparity in wages has been a thing in dressing rooms since the dawn of time. If anything it should be a motivator for those at the bottom of the pile - "fucking hell he's shit and still earns six times what I do - I'm going to pull my tripe out ahead of negotiations about my next contract, if they're willing to pay him that they can do the same for me".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, oafcmetty said:

It's not like it's any surprise though, is it? Disparity in wages has been a thing in dressing rooms since the dawn of time. If anything it should be a motivator for those at the bottom of the pile - "fucking hell he's shit and still earns six times what I do - I'm going to pull my tripe out ahead of negotiations about my next contract, if they're willing to pay him that they can do the same for me".


Yeah there’s also a number of factors in the disparity. Youth v Experience, playing position, previous pedigree. 
 

Norwood will be on a lot more than Reid and Nuttall and rightly so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oafcmetty said:

It's not like it's any surprise though, is it? Disparity in wages has been a thing in dressing rooms since the dawn of time. If anything it should be a motivator for those at the bottom of the pile - "fucking hell he's shit and still earns six times what I do - I'm going to pull my tripe out ahead of negotiations about my next contract, if they're willing to pay him that they can do the same for me".

 

As you say and it happens in local league cricket when there's often 1 highly paid professional and the rest amateurs who look up them and perform to the best of their ability.

However, if the professional isn't performing it could cause problems -in which case they usually don't stay long.

Edited by BP1960
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Wardie said:

Thing is, who do we believe...the site's "Reliable sources" or yours?

It would beggar belief for Sutton to be on that and be on the same pitch as Nuttall, for example and if players see this and believe it, then I can fully understand how issues [grudges] would arise and affect performances. Too much info is a dangerous thing, especially if it is unreliable.

As @oafc1955 said, it's below the National Minimum Wage which somewhat undermines the credibility.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hemel latic said:

As @oafc1955 said, it's below the National Minimum Wage which somewhat undermines the credibility.

 

 


Is it if you work a 40 week. 
 

Footballers work a 15 hour a week if that, which would put a young player on over £20 a hour. (Not great by football standards) but still decent for a 20 year old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, League one forever said:


Is it if you work a 40 week. 
 

Footballers work a 15 hour a week if that, which would put a young player on over £20 a hour. (Not great by football standards) but still decent for a 20 year old. 

A footballer’s week is indeterminate and is basically as and when required.

For instance an away trip to say Southend which if you include a stopover could account for 30 hours at least, even the shortest of trips to the likes of Rochdale would account for probably 8!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oafc1955 said:

A footballer’s week is indeterminate and is basically as and when required.

For instance an away trip to say Southend which if you include a stopover could account for 30 hours at least, even the shortest of trips to the likes of Rochdale would account for probably 8!!


Aye, that’s true. So the minimum wage point is moot anyway. Is he being paid to sit on a bus or have a massage. . . or to actually play football. The answer is all of it. 
 

Wether it’s true or not- £330 for a young division 5 player on the fringes of the first team seems reasonable to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, League one forever said:


😂

Come on Dave, which bit? 

 

As I went onto say- it’s difficult to measure their working hours as 55 says - it’s indeterminate. 
 

So I think £330 for a Sutton level player is fair- do you not? 

 

It strikes me as very low.  But then again I suspect that list is bollox anyway - who would know other than the club?  Surely they're not leaking the whole wage bill!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...